Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:SPAMHEADERS

2001-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Sorry - I forgot to attach the files to the last email. Here they are. Actually, the log file came through as a Microsoft "link" file. If you E-mail it to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I'll check it out. -Scott --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:SPAMHEADERS

2001-09-20 Thread Michael Bartolotta
Sorry - I forgot to attach the files to the last email. Here they are. Scott- I set the LOGLEVEL to DEBUG and I've attached some entries from it. I also attached the $default$.JunkMail and Global.cfg files. It appears in the log as if the tests used the $default$.JunkMail file, but if you look

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:SPAMHEADERS

2001-09-20 Thread Michael Bartolotta
Scott- I set the LOGLEVEL to DEBUG and I've attached some entries from it. I also attached the $default$.JunkMail and Global.cfg files. It appears in the log as if the tests used the $default$.JunkMail file, but if you look at the actions in it they are set to WARN and the Global.cfg file has th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:SPAMHEADERS

2001-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>1. When I use the SPAMHEADERS test it picks up almost all SPAM we recieve >that the other tests I use miss, but it also picks up some legitimate >email. The legitimate email often has lower case name followed by capital >domain (EX: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Is there >a

[Declude.JunkMail] MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:SPAMHEADERS

2001-09-20 Thread Michael Bartolotta
I have a couple questions:   1.  When I use the SPAMHEADERS test it picks up almost all SPAM we recieve that the other tests I use miss,  but it also picks up some legitimate email.  The legitimate email often has lower case name followed by capital domain (EX: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Is there any

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2001-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Will Whitelist accept a wildcard, such as 168.nnn.nnn.* ? Just get rid of the "*", and it will work, like this: WHITELIST IP 168.nnn.nnn. That will whitelist all IPs beginning with 168.nnn.nnn. -Scott --- This E-mail came fro

Re: [Declude.JunkMail]

2001-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>---Unfortunately, that's what I've been doing (using WARN by itself) and I >am not getting anything added to the email header - it just >seems to ignore everything. Try adding "%WARNING%" after it, like this: MAILFROMWARN%WARNING% It may be that for some reason Declude s

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist

2001-09-20 Thread Don Brown
Will Whitelist accept a wildcard, such as 168.nnn.nnn.* ? Thanks, Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.inetconcepts.net PGP Key ID: 04C99A55 (972) 788-2364 Fax: (972) 788-5049 Providing Internet Solutions World

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Knowledgebase Entry to Prevent Crashes?

2001-09-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
>what was that Qx number for the Registry Hack where you could customize >that heap value per task so that more Imail/Declude tasks could run? The links are http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q142676 and http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=kb;e