Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] newbie here

I need to know how to test email very conservatively at first, with little or no risk of catching any legitimate email. Stopping some of the spam in the begginning is better than stopping none of it, or stopping legitimate emails. Badheaders and mailfrom...do they both meet that criteria? Yes

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Failing test

Hey! that's the same thing that is happening here. all of a sudden one of our ip's is being tagged as spam too.. - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:51 AM Subject:

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail]

What is the deal with the *weighting* ? That's a new feature in beta, where you can assign a weight to each test. If enough tests fail, and the total weight for an E-mail reaches a certain threshold, it is considered spam. It's nice because you can still use tests that have a fair number

Re[5]: [Declude.JunkMail]

Hi, Still looking for response to the other items.. Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumpernet.com 315-282-0020 Thursday, December 27, 2001, 11:37:07 AM, you wrote: 1) at It appears there may be privacy issues if I use the HOLD action, and at look at the email... 2) at

[Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Opps!

I guess I get 3 lashes with a wet noodle because I forgot to turn off receipts. Sorry! :) John Tolmachoff, Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835 714-578-7999, ext. 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reliancesoft.com   --- [This E-mail was scanned for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Failing test

indication of what is going wrong there or if they will be coming back. I would recommend disabling the ORBZ* tests. OK, in the GLOBAL.cfg, I removed warn form the 3 ORBZ* tests and left that area blank, but I still see the failure notice in the deccon. The best option is to disable the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight Fix?

I remember several announcements in the past two weeks (since the official 1.30 beta started), that there was going to be a fix in the respective next day or two that would at least re-fix the weight test? It's actually only been about a week -- the holidays seem to make it seem longer. The

MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight Fix?

Reply to: R. Scott Perry Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weight Fix? on Thursday 1:16:53 PM We have not seen it error here. It adds 'em up and HOLDs all exceeding the limit just fine. We basically set all switches to WARN except WEIGHT10 and then we can see just how well each combination of tests

Re[2]: MISSING_REVERSE_DNS:Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] newbiehere

This, unfortunately, is not possible most of the time as CGI is commonly hard coded and cannot be modified. In addition, those who do this CGI are not open to any modificatons requsted with their product. That's too bad. I can see how that would work in cases where it is acceptable for a

DSN:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.31 released

Link please! :) John Tolmachoff, Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835 714-578-7999, ext. 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reliancesoft.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry

[Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Heuristics and Weight

I am interested in enabling the Heur and/or Weighted filtering. Is there a page that provides some detailed syntax examples to their implementation in the cfg file. Sincerely, John David M. Miller SAMnet 2785 Boston Road Wilbraham MA, 01095 Tel: (413) 596-2050 Fax: (413) 599-1771