I second this!!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennie
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Hey Tom,
I have a suggestion... :)
On your spam
I'm getting the weight just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Noticed after updating to v1.0.12
If any one has any documentation about junkmail pro.
FYI, you can find the documentation at
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm .
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
We use JunkMail pro and can't imagine working without it. Not only does it
support our Message Niffer product nicely (www.sortmonster.com) but it
allows you to customize how rules are interpreted (actions) for different
domains - this is a must since most people see spam differently. That is,
one
This is a forwarded message
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thought others here might find this interesting as I did.
--
Roger Heath
=Original message text===
My mail server and Declude is really being tested today.
I think
