RE: [Declude.JunkMail] attachments ending in .text

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
Go to your room! This is weird. The virus detector is catching it as it says there is no file extension so it assumes the extension to be .exe. Aha! 12/10/2002 11:03:03 Q1e400d65014a69ab Found file with mismatched extensions [AR.B.S.ARB-AR.B.S.ARB]; assuming .exe The problem here is that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How do I know when a message is truly SPAM?

2002-12-11 Thread Timothy C. Bohen
Okay I think that our declude is working great. But from time to time my boss will get a bunch of crap in a day and come to me complaining about it not working. From what I can tell he gives his email address out to anybody or anything that asks for it. Is there any way I can look at headers

[Declude.JunkMail] How do I know when a message is truly SPAM?

2002-12-11 Thread Timothy C. Bohen
Okay I think that our declude is working great. But from time to time my boss will get a bunch of crap in a day and come to me complaining about it not working. From what I can tell he gives his email address out to anybody or anything that asks for it. Is there any way I can look at headers

[Declude.JunkMail] I've been reported!

2002-12-11 Thread Dan Horne
What do you do when uninformed (L)users start reporting you to spam databases in error? I received an email that was CC:ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from some guy who got a 400 Million Email Addresses spam with a forged, nonexistent email address on my domain in the From: field. Here is his message

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] I've been reported!

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
What do you do when uninformed (L)users start reporting you to spam databases in error? That's usually easy to deal with. If they submitted you to a spam database that requires proof of spamming, you need to fix the problem that caused the spam to get out. If they submitted you to a spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I've been reported!

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
We have a canned response we send to people who send us complaints where the E-mail didn't originate from us (we have one domain that for some reason gets occasional abuse@ complaints like the one you saw). Would you care to share your response with us please? :)) John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I've been reported!

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have a canned response we send to people who send us complaints where the E-mail didn't originate from us (we have one domain that for some reason gets occasional abuse@ complaints like the one you saw). Would you care to share your response with us please? :)) The one we have is in the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.65 (release)released

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
Ah nice n easy.. I know it's working because I can see the actions in the logs. I thing I make a habit of now is as soon as I go to the new version, I run declude -diag from within the directory it is in so as to check that it is correct. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.65 (release)released

2002-12-11 Thread paul
I thing I make a habit of now is as soon as I go to the new version, I run declude -diag from within the directory it is in so as to check that it is correct. Ah, ok John, I see that now. Thanks! I'll make a note of that myself. Paul --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IBM article about spam and telemarketers

2002-12-11 Thread Charles Frolick
This is a very naive approach. If it deals with billing, it will need lots of legislation, tax law consideration, it will cause the owner of the phone number or email to deal with taxes for the collected income. Not to mention the crack pots that will say it is $10,000 to place an unwanted call

[Declude.JunkMail] Weird Message in headers?

2002-12-11 Thread Grant Griffith
Can anyone explain this? Not sure when I began receiving it, but can not find what is causing this. The message caught is actually from this list. X-RBL-Warning: SUMMIT: Your mail bounced because the server you sent it to is using a blocklist which no longer exists (blackholes.2mbit.com)

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weird Message in headers?

2002-12-11 Thread Grant Griffith
Weird, not all of them had the message and the text was commented out. If it is commented out, it still does some checking? Sincerely, Grant Griffith, Vice President EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc. http://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] External test

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
On an external test, for the returnvalue field, is it possible to accept a range? Example: 1-20 21-40 41-60 61-80 81-100 John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External test

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
On an external test, for the returnvalue field, is it possible to accept a range? Example: 1-20 21-40 41-60 61-80 81-100 No, you can only match a single return code. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
While do some testing with Junkmail in DEBUG mode, I noticed about 3 lines for each filter line in a filter test. How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.65 (release) released

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
Scott, I do not see it in the release notes, did the ISBLANK option of SUBJECT in a filter make it in? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.65 (release) released

2002-12-11 Thread Kami Razvan
I wonder if using SUBJECT 5 IS Catch the blank subject..? Regards, Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.65 (release)released

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I do not see it in the release notes, did the ISBLANK option of SUBJECT in a filter make it in? Yes, it did. :) -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.65 (release) released

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
Yes, it did. :) Thanks John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
While do some testing with Junkmail in DEBUG mode, I noticed about 3 lines for each filter line in a filter test. How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? If you are using the debug mode, it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread John Tolmachoff
If you are using the debug mode, it will be very ineffective. Not in debug mode, but general. I only noticed it in debug. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter processing time.

2002-12-11 Thread Sanford Whiteman
John, How effective is Declude in doing say a 50 line filter test as compared to a program that is doing a filter test of the same configuration? A little vague, no? How good is IMail at SMTP deliveries, compared to my proprietary MTA? -Sandy --- [This E-mail was scanned