Reminds me of my weeks with Declude (over a year now). Turned out the format of my
comments wasn't right, it was being rejected as header content, dropping into the
body. As I recall, not all mail clients responded the same way - MS clients showing
the problem.
I never went beyond making ea
When I use an XOUTHEADER or turn XSENDER ON, it places
the text at the end of the body, not in the header. Has anyone seen this
before?
I’m using Declude v1.69b
Thanks,
Dan Keltgen
|On the first step it checks the entire body in ist raw format.
|Before the second step any html-tags (real or invented) are removed.
|
|This allows to identify a lot of obfusticated keywords.
|
|I assume other external content-tests like Spammanager and
|Sortmonster are also able to do this. You
I'm having trouble understanding the weights in favor of the other tests.
The easiest way to understand is to realize that the weight tests act like
all the other tests.
If you have an email that say spamcop is blocking and have that set to
warn in the junkmail file, also it is listed in relays
I added:
COMMENTS comments 10 x 5 0
to global.cfg file.
I added:
COMMENTSLOG
to my $default$.JunkMail
Do I need to do anything else to implement this filter?
That's all you need to do (just so long as you are running the latest beta).
Title: weights
I'm having trouble understanding the weights in favor of the other tests. If you have an email that say spamcop is blocking and have that set to warn in the junkmail file, also it is listed in relays.osirusoft.com which is listed as warn, and the total weight of an the email is
I added:
COMMENTS comments 10 x 5 0
to global.cfg file.
I added:
COMMENTSLOG
to my $default$.JunkMail
Do I need to do anything else to implement this filter?
TIA
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Decl
nope sorry 1.65
any other way to do whitelists?
Most whitelists work fine in v1.65 -- it's just that whitelisting based on
the reverse DNS entry, HELO/EHLO, and the subject weren't added until after
1.65. So you can use "WHITELIST FROM", "WHITELIST IP", "WHITELIST TO",
"WHITELIST TODOMAIN", an
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelists
nope sorry 1.65
any other way to do whitelists?
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelists
>How do I add whitel
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelists
I'm using version 1.66
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelists
>How do I add whitelists to my deculde config
The company I work for is a telecommunications company that is
also an ISP. I work for the telephone side of the company.
About 18 months ago we setup an email server using IMAIL and
Declude for all of the "inhouse" accounts and had our ISP branch
forward all of the old "pldi.net" email addres
How do I add whitelists to my deculde config. I was trying to use this
config:
# Trusted Companies
WHITELIST REVDNS .amazon.com
WHITELIST REVDNS .army.mil
WHITELIST REVDNS .channing-bete.com
the log file says invalid whitelist.
Any suggestions?
The W
Title: Whitelists
How do I add whitelists to my deculde config. I was trying to use this config:
# Trusted Companies
WHITELIST REVDNS .amazon.com
WHITELIST REVDNS .army.mil
WHITELIST REVDNS .channing-bete.com
the log file says invalid whitel
Well, Declude certainly works as it caught this message. :-)
Erik
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Salmond
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 08:54
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Regarding Obfuscation
>
There was some talk a while ago about blocking the tags used to make it
difficult to parse text in spam.
That depends:
this stuff:
ou thousands over the life of your
loan! What are you
waiting for? http://mtggreat1.com/4/index.asp?RefID=588897";>
Visit Now
This is easy to catch. In the latest
Hi Rob,
If you want you can try SpamChk. At his current release it has two
levels of keyword checks.
On the first step it checks the entire body in ist raw format.
Before the second step any html-tags (real or invented) are removed.
This allows to identify a lot of obfusticated keywords.
I a
There was some talk a while ago about blocking the tags used to make it
difficult to parse text in spam.
this stuff:
ou thousands over the life of your
loan! What are you
waiting for? http://mtggreat1.com/4/index.asp?RefID=588897";>
Visit Now
Scott suggested this would be impracticle since any
Below is a snip of my log from Declude Junkmail and I have been watching it
all day.
It appears that most if not all connecting servers get the HELOBOGUS error
including my servers )
Actually, they aren't failing the test. :)
07/15/2003 19:59:04 Q9517001d0332cd8b Msg failed MX; testing A (HELOB
18 matches
Mail list logo
