[Declude.JunkMail] Test definitions and actions

Question, if a test is defined for use in weighting only, and no action will be performed based on that test, does it have to be listed in the $default$.junkmail and action portion of Global.cfg? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body

Ok, I've given this one some more thought and review and it looks like the way that Scott suggested it might have a better long-term effect. It's my belief that spam, especially the worst of the worst, will become more and more graphic based because of heuristics, however if they simply just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test definitions and actions

Question, if a test is defined for use in weighting only, and no action will be performed based on that test, does it have to be listed in the $default$.junkmail and action portion of Global.cfg? Just so long as it is listed in the global.cfg file, the weighting will be used.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Delay. Was: Feature request: no displayable text in body

A feature that delays incoming mail from unfamiliar (new) source IPs would allow heuristic tests (like Message Sniffer) and rbls time to add coding for the messages before processing them. That is, if the connecting IP is unknown then Declude could park the message in a folder for some amount

[Declude.JunkMail] AVAFTERJM

If you have the option AVAFTERJM set to ON (Virus.cfg) will an email that is processed using teh ROUTETO option get scanned. Thanks. Fred --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body

...since a delay is mostly harmless... Pete, you're an awesome programmer, and I stand in awe of Sniffer's sophistication and penetration. However, I think your idea is strikingly out-of-touch with the way SMTP is used in 2003. We can howl to the heavens about its

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AVAFTERJM

If you have the option AVAFTERJM set to ON (Virus.cfg) will an email that is processed using teh ROUTETO option get scanned. Yes, it will. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body in body body

At 04:00 PM 9/6/2003 -0400, you wrote: ...since a delay is mostly harmless... Pete, you're an awesome programmer, and I stand in awe of Sniffer's sophistication and penetration. Thanks. However, I think your idea is strikingly out-of-touch with the way SMTP is used in 2003. We can

Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body in body body

Keep in mind that known message sources would not be delayed - only new, unknown sources. This amounts in principle to an automatic management of QOS - giving some preference to traffic that is already established. I understand the idea, but I still disagree strongly

RE: Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body in body body

FWIW, I agree. Some of my clients are bankers that exchange their documents over encrypted email and expect instant delivery. Of course, with user and domain specific configurations, these could easily be exempted from delayed processing. Not on systems we manage. If 2 hours were the average

RE: Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body in body body

At 09:35 PM 9/6/2003 -0600, you wrote: FWIW, I agree. Some of my clients are bankers that exchange their documents over encrypted email and expect instant delivery. Of course, with user and domain specific configurations, these could easily be exempted from delayed processing. Indeed. However,

Re[3]: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature request: no displayable text in body body in body body in body body in body body

At 10:53 PM 9/6/2003 -0400, you wrote: Keep in mind that known message sources would not be delayed - only new, unknown sources. This amounts in principle to an automatic management of QOS - giving some preference to traffic that is already established. I understand the idea,