[Declude.JunkMail] Update to GibberishSUB

2003-11-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I have added the following to both GibberishSUB and AntiGibberishSUB files:

SUBJECT 0 CONTAINS asr#

This has shown up in a few messages going to a financial company.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

2003-11-06 Thread Bill Landry



Attached are a couple of scripts (and sample 
output) that can be used, if using log level MID or higher, tooutput the 
"From" e-mail address and sending IP address (first script), or output just the 
sending IP addresses, listed by count (second script).

HTH,

Bill

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matthew Bramble 

  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:21 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more 
  try...
  Andy,I tried sending this twice, but I think Scott's 
  server blocked it because of the content in the headers, so the headers are 
  attached as a zip this time. Your global.cfg would have something like 
  the following and the adjusted filter file is in the original reply pasted 
  below (name the filter whatever you wish).[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  filter C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  x 5  0Then the original reply (adjusted a 
  little)...MattActually, I think this one is in the format 
  of [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  so the filter would need to be:MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]MAILFROM 0  
  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]I put a number before the domain because it 
  appears that this spammer uses VERP and the pattern always has a number before 
  the "@b." so this will help protect from false positives. I just 
  wouldn't necessaarily kill it for just this one thing, and I don't think you 
  have to because this stuff isn't getting through my server, so it's picking up 
  points from RBL's and other things.I've seen this stuff coming through 
  my own machine and noted it because of the question earlier. I fear that 
  the pattern is only temporary, but if I'm not mistaken, this is from one of 
  the contest type of spammers with a set group of IP's that they send out 
  from. You could more effectively search for hits and take the IP 
  addresses out and then filter for those as long-term prevention in the event 
  that this pattern fails (which I expect it will). Bill could probably 
  grep that info from his logs in seconds :) Be sure to share if you 
  do. I wouldn't bother with the domain names because they seem to be very 
  temporary.Here are three such headers from this spammer, and all of 
  the domain names were registered recently through pairNIC.com, http://whois.pairnic.com/Mattandyb 
  wrote:
  So, the line

MYFILTER filter C:\IMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x x 5 0

should have 2 x's because of the 2 tiered weighting system I'm using?

Thanks,

Andy

- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...


  

  to be sure, the syntax would be:

in Global.cfg:
MYFILTER filter C:\IMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x x 5 0

In myfilter.txt:
MAILFROM5STARTSWITH b.
  That would work fine.


  Isn't this adding the weight of 5 twice?  I'd like it to only be added
  once.
  
Yes, that would add the weight twice.  The total weight for the test is a
combination of the general weight for the test (the "5" in the "MYFILTER
filter" line) plus the weight for each line that matches (the "MAILFROM 5"
line).

In this case, you might instead want to use:

 MAILFROM0STARTSWITH b.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
  
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  -- 
===
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===


grep.zip
Description: Zip compressed data


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Update to GibberishSUB

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble
Thanks John.  I marked it up along with two other recently reported 
catches, more importantly, the addition of VIN numbers to the 
exclusions.  I put a space after the vin  and nwq  entries.  I'll 
update the file on my site after a little more time passes.

- GIBBERISHSUB and ANTI-GIBBERISHSUB -
SUBJECT0CONTAINSasr#
SUBJECT0CONTAINSasr num
SUBJECT0CONTAINSvin
SUBJECT0CONTAINSvin:
SUBJECT0CONTAINSvin#
- ANTI-GIBBERISHSUB file only -
SUBJECT0CONTAINSnwq
SUBJECT0CONTAINSnwq.com
- GIBBERISH and ANTI-GIBBERISH -
BODY0CONTAINSasr#
BODY0CONTAINSasr num
BODY0CONTAINSvin
BODY0CONTAINSvin:
BODY0CONTAINSvin#
- ANTI-GIBBERISH file only -
BODY0CONTAINSnwq
BODY0CONTAINSnwq.com


John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:

I have added the following to both GibberishSUB and AntiGibberishSUB files:

SUBJECT 0 CONTAINS asr#

This has shown up in a few messages going to a financial company.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

--
===
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




Very interesting. Looks like the @b. thing is a standard in some piece
of VERP software. BTW, unless you (generally) are extremely agressive
(sans FiveTen), this would be a very bad idea to implement as a
filter. So please ignore my initial filter submission...but I've got
something bulletproof to replace it.

This spammer that we were trying to identify with that string was
probably Douglas Fields of Pexicom, Inc. His old
network is in SBL (SBL5185), but it appears that he went out and
registered some new blocks of addresses, and got others through
Above.net, from which he also get's bandwidth. If anyone knows how to
report him to SBL, it might help a lot of people. I couldn't figure
out how to report during a cursory search of their site.

With the help of your file, a bunch of data from past spam captures,
that header clue that exposed his software, and a little DNS work...I
came up with 9 new blocks not in SBL with reverse DNS names with 9
addresses each (ns1, ns2, www and mail1 through mail6). I won't assume
for a second that is all, but it's a lot and considering the age of
many of the domains, he hasn't yet exposed all of his servers to the
RBL's (less than 1/4 were in a multi-week 150 MB capture that found all
of this stuff). If he wasn't failing BADHEADERS, some of this would
have gotten through on my server, so I wrote it as a filter just for
this one guy and attached it to this note. Implement safely with the
following line, and kill the filter after SBL picks it up.

- Global.cfg -
PEXICOM  filter C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\Pexicom.txt  x 25 
0

My guess is that this guy was approaching 1% of my total E-mail volume,
which is pretty serious, though one of the crud spammers is currently
doing about 5% I think. Hopefully he'll stay put for a while seing as
how ARIN has him on record:

Matt



Bill Landry wrote:

  
  
  
  
  Attached are a couple of scripts
(and sample output) that can be used, if using log level MID or higher,
tooutput the "From" e-mail address and sending IP address (first
script), or output just the sending IP addresses, listed by count
(second script).
  
  HTH,
  
  Bill
  
-
Original Message - 
From:
Matthew
Bramble 
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent:
Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:21 PM
Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...


Andy,

I tried sending this twice, but I think Scott's server blocked it
because of the content in the headers, so the headers are attached as a
zip this time. Your global.cfg would have something like the following
and the adjusted filter file is in the original reply pasted below
(name the filter whatever you wish).

[EMAIL PROTECTED]  filter
C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\[EMAIL PROTECTED] x 5  0


Then the original reply (adjusted a little)...

Matt


Actually, I think this one is in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED],
so the filter would need to be:

MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAILFROM 0  CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I put a number before the domain because it appears that this spammer
uses VERP and the pattern always has a number before the "@b." so this
will help protect from false positives. I just wouldn't necessaarily
kill it for just this one thing, and I don't think you have to because
this stuff isn't getting through my server, so it's picking up points
from RBL's and other things.

I've seen this stuff coming through my own machine and noted it because
of the question earlier. I fear that the pattern is only temporary,
but if I'm not mistaken, this is from one of the contest type of
spammers with a set group of IP's that they send out from. You could
more effectively search for hits and take the IP addresses out and then
filter for those as long-term prevention in the event that this pattern
fails (which I expect it will). Bill could probably grep that info
from his logs in seconds :) Be sure to share if you do. I wouldn't
bother with the domain names because they seem to be very temporary.

Here are three such headers from this spammer, and all of the domain
names were registered recently through pairNIC.com, http://whois.pairnic.com/

Matt


andyb wrote:

  So, the line

MYFILTER filter C:\IMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x x 5 0

should have 2 x's because of the 2 tiered weighting system I'm using?

Thanks,

Andy

- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...


  
  

  to be sure, the syntax would be:

in Global.cfg:
MYFILTER filter 

[Declude.JunkMail] High Traffic Windows tweaks

2003-11-06 Thread Adrian Hauri
For those out there who run a high traffic mailserver

I just found this article:
http://www.stalker.com/CommuniGatePro/Scalability.html#TimeWait

Summary:
- It is recommended to change the TCP TIME_WAIT time in the windows registry
from 180 seconds to 20-30 seconds .
- The Windows system limits the maximum number port number assigned to
outgoing connections. By default this value is 5000. You may want to
increase that value to 20,000 or more, by adding the MaxUserPort DWORD-type
value to the
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters,
key.

Please let me (and the list) know if you experience a performance increase.

Cheers

Adrian

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude\$default$.junkmail Question

2003-11-06 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
If I only have 1 domain, and a per domain.junkmail file setup shouldn't the 
domain.junkmail file be used at all time?

At 06:14 PM 11/5/2003, you wrote:

Under what circumstances does Declude use the \Declude\$default$.junkmail 
file?
The global.cfg file is used for all global settings, and for actions on 
outgoing mail.

The $default$.JunkMail file is used for actions on incoming mail.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
--
Burzin Sumariwalla   Phone: (314) 994-9411 x291
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax:   (314) 997-7615
  Pager: (314) 407-3345
Networking and Telecommunications Manager
Information Technology Services
St. Louis County Library District
1640 S. Lindbergh Blvd.
St. Louis, MO  63131 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude\$default$.junkmail Question

2003-11-06 Thread R. Scott Perry

If I only have 1 domain, and a per domain.junkmail file setup shouldn't 
the domain.junkmail file be used at all time?
Yes, for all incoming E-mail (the global.cfg file would still be used for 
outgoing E-mail).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...

2003-11-06 Thread andyb



Thanks everyone, I have it working. It was 
also necessary to go to the $defualt$.junkmail config file and add MYFILTER WARN 
so I could see the results in spam review.

Thanks, Andy



[Declude.JunkMail] False Email Address on Spam

2003-11-06 Thread Hank Townsend

A user of mine has recently started receiving postmaster rejection notices
(mailbox full, no such user, etc.) on Spam messages that he did not send
out. Someone has used his email address as the return.

Is there anything that can be done about this short of finding the offending
person and chopping off his/her fingers?

Does anyone have any suggestions? I don't want out server reported to the
spam gods because of this.

Thanks.

Hank

---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses.]
[MGT of America, Inc.]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Administration
Hello Scot,

this program looks very good!
i've been messing around with this same idea for a little while, but using ASP
instead.

could i by any chance get a copy of your script?

thanks in advance for your time!
ken

Thursday, November 6, 2003, 1:27:49 PM, you wrote:

SD I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow our customers to
SD self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and declude actions. It's
SD very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion, SQL
SD database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the text files to
SD disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice would be to have
SD it sync the password with the IMAIL password. I suppose one of these days I
SD will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL password storage, which
SD would solve the problem.

SD Your comments are welcomed:

SD http://spamwatch.njaccess.com

SD demo login
SD user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SD pw: spam

SD Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.

SD Thanks,


SD --
SD Scot


SD - Original Message - 
SD From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SD To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SD Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
SD Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions



 Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The docs say that
SD the
 white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just wanted to
SD confirm
 it goes there and not global.cfg.

 That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for incoming mail
 only, and only applies to the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail and
 per-user/per-domain files.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
SD (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


SD ---
SD [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

SD ---
SD This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
SD unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
SD type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
SD at http://www.mail-archive.com.
SD ---
SD [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




-- 
Best regards,
 Administrationmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Mark Brody
I am not able to login with the demo username and password.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Desort
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow our customers
to self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and declude actions.
It's very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion,
SQL database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the text
files to disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice
would be to have it sync the password with the IMAIL password. I suppose
one of these days I will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL
password storage, which would solve the problem.

Your comments are welcomed:

http://spamwatch.njaccess.com

demo login
user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pw: spam

Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.

Thanks,


--
Scot


- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions



 Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The docs say 
 that
the
 white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just wanted to
confirm
 it goes there and not global.cfg.

 That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for incoming 
 mail only, and only applies to the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail 
 and per-user/per-domain files.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail 
 mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in

 mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing:

 Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Pexicom - was one more try...

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




I did a little more checking around those IP blocks and found that I
only had a small portion of this guy's network tagged. He has about
600 IP's and over 30 domains spread across 5 concurrent blocks of
addresses. Naturally this isn't necessarily all of it, but you can
identify more blocks by searching the headers of a spam capture for
occurrences of "X-JLH:" in the headers, which is unique to this guy at
the moment. This is what I have thus far:

 208.184.54.0/25
 208.184.58.0/25
 209.249.21.128/25
 209.249.55.128/25
 216.200.60.16/28
 216.200.60.32/27
 216.200.60.64/26

I also listed the domains that come up in reverse DNS as comments in
the filter file, though you probably don't need to be filtering for
them.

I rewrote the filter to work as an "ipfile" in Declude, which means
that it will work on Standard as well as Pro versions. This one block
of addresses sends a piece of spam to my server once every 10 minutes
or less on a volume of about 4,000 a day currently. This means that he
is responsible for about 3.6% of my total mail volume, and of course,
3.6% of my mail filtering processing power. He also isn't listed
consistently on any RBL's with these addresses and only fails most of
the time on my server because he also has a problem with BADHEADERS.
So I think it definitely makes sense to add the attached filter (note
the slight configuration change to reflect the "ipfile" type instead of
"filter" type). It should be very easy on resources, but kill it when
SBL picks up the block.

Considering the volume of spam from this one guy, and SBL's claim for
instance that 90% of the spam is sent from a core group of 200 spammers
(which this guy doesn't yet belong to), I think it makes sense to maybe
start blocking either at the router, or at IMail's Access Control
configuration option. You would get the rejection logged in IMail with
the second choice, and it would hardly use any resources to do so. For
servers handling many tens of thousands of messages a day, this might
make a lot of sense to do, and maybe use SBL as a reference for what's
block worthy at a given space in time (I don't think they change much).

Matt



Matthew Bramble wrote:

  
  
Very interesting. Looks like the @b. thing is a standard in some piece
of VERP software. BTW, unless you (generally) are extremely agressive
(sans FiveTen), this would be a very bad idea to implement as a
filter. So please ignore my initial filter submission...but I've got
something bulletproof to replace it.
  
This spammer that we were trying to identify with that string was
probably Douglas Fields of Pexicom, Inc. His old
network is in SBL (SBL5185), but it appears that he went out and
registered some new blocks of addresses, and got others through
Above.net, from which he also get's bandwidth. If anyone knows how to
report him to SBL, it might help a lot of people. I couldn't figure
out how to report during a cursory search of their site.
  
With the help of your file, a bunch of data from past spam captures,
that header clue that exposed his software, and a little DNS work...I
came up with 9 new blocks not in SBL with reverse DNS names with 9
addresses each (ns1, ns2, www and mail1 through mail6). I won't assume
for a second that is all, but it's a lot and considering the age of
many of the domains, he hasn't yet exposed all of his servers to the
RBL's (less than 1/4 were in a multi-week 150 MB capture that found all
of this stuff). If he wasn't failing BADHEADERS, some of this would
have gotten through on my server, so I wrote it as a filter just for
this one guy and attached it to this note. Implement safely with the
following line, and kill the filter after SBL picks it up.
  
- Global.cfg -
PEXICOM  filter C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\Pexicom.txt  x 25 
0
  
My guess is that this guy was approaching 1% of my total E-mail volume,
which is pretty serious, though one of the crud spammers is currently
doing about 5% I think. Hopefully he'll stay put for a while seing as
how ARIN has him on record:
  
Matt
  
  
  
Bill Landry wrote:
  




Attached are a couple of scripts
(and sample output) that can be used, if using log level MID or higher,
tooutput the "From" e-mail address and sending IP address (first
script), or output just the sending IP addresses, listed by count
(second script).

HTH,

Bill

  -
Original Message - 
  From:
  Matthew
Bramble 
  To:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Sent:
Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:21 PM
  Subject:
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...
  
  
Andy,
  
I tried sending this twice, but I think Scott's server blocked it
because of the content in the headers, so the headers are attached as a
zip this time. Your global.cfg would have something like the following
and the adjusted filter file is in the original reply pasted below
(name the filter whatever you wish).
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  filter

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Matt Robertson
Have you thought of giving users more control over the process?  As in a db tie-in to 
tests, weights and actions?  I use CF as well and I'm figuring on doing something that 
will allow enablement of a particular test, or its disablement, coupled to setting the 
test weight and action performed.  Should be fairly simple to use cffile to write out 
a Declude file with the dangerous stuff hardcoded into it.  Probably 30 days away from 
having the time to finally do it.

I get customization requests daily from this or that user.  Nobody wants the same 
thing.  Frankly I'm sick of hearing it and am ready to turn the process over to the 
user and let them have at it if they want to be the antispam genius.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Scot Desort
OK, someone changed the password in the demo. I have reset it back to
'spam'.

Folks, if you do visit the demo page, please don't change the password...
You can change anything else.

http://spamwatch.njaccess.com

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pw=spam

--
Scot



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Brody
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:10 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface
 
 
 I am not able to login with the demo username and password.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Desort
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:28 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface
 
 
 I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow 
 our customers
 to self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and 
 declude actions.
 It's very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion,
 SQL database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the text
 files to disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice
 would be to have it sync the password with the IMAIL 
 password. I suppose
 one of these days I will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL
 password storage, which would solve the problem.
 
 Your comments are welcomed:
 
 http://spamwatch.njaccess.com
 
 demo login
 user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pw: spam
 
 Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 --
 Scot
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions
 
 
 
  Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The docs say 
  that
 the
  white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just wanted to
 confirm
  it goes there and not global.cfg.
 
  That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for incoming 
  mail only, and only applies to the 
 \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail 
  and per-user/per-domain files.
 
  -Scott
  ---
  Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail 
  mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is 
 the leader in
 
  mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've 
 been missing:
 
  Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the 
 Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Administration
HA!
Preach on my brother!lol..
I am also an admin for an ISP, and i too am extremely suck of hearing people
complain about spam! like they could do a better job. :-P


 Ken

Thursday, November 6, 2003, 3:34:19 PM, you wrote:

MR Have you thought of giving users more control over the process?  As in
MR a db tie-in to tests, weights and actions?  I use CF as well and I'm
MR figuring on doing something that will allow enablement of a particular test,
MR or its disablement, coupled to setting the test weight and action performed.
MR Should be fairly simple to use cffile to write out a Declude file with the
MR dangerous stuff hardcoded into it.  Probably 30 days away from having the
MR time to finally do it.

MR I get customization requests daily from this or that user.  Nobody
MR wants the same thing.  Frankly I'm sick of hearing it and am ready to turn
MR the process over to the user and let them have at it if they want to be the
MR antispam genius.
MR ---
MR [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

MR ---
MR This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
MR unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MR type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
MR at http://www.mail-archive.com.
MR ---
MR [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




-- 
Best regards,
 Administrationmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Scot Desort
Well, we use a weighting system with declude. All of the tests and their
associated weights are hard-coded into global.cfg, with the weightrange
tests. Then, each user has a .junkmail file that basically only contains the
spam control level they have chosen (WEIGHT3 for medium on my web
interface), followed by the chosen action. All of the individual RBL and
filter tests defined in global.cfg are not present in the users .junkmail
file. Only the cumulative WEIGHT test. Therefore, I don't see how I could
give them more control, since everything else is handled in the global.cfg
file, and I'm sure as hell not going to allow them to mess with that file.

If I was running a simpler config where each test stood on it's own, and it
was up to the user to do client side filtering on individual tests and total
declude weight, I guess I could then let them manipulate the inclusion or
exclusion of specific tests in the .junkmail file. However, the majority of
my users want nothing to do with that level of control. When someone signs
up for spam control, we set them up in the db, with declude set to off for
them (no action). This FORCES them to go into the web interface and setup
their account for the first time, become familiar with the controls, and
this way WE cannot be blamed for setting their spam control to high or too
low.

In the future, I might even consider having different actions for different
weights. But even that might be too confusing for them.

On a side note, I am not using CFFILE for writing my files to disk. I am
using a tag that reads a text file into a variable line by line. I can then
search, LINE BY LINE, for individual text (aka TEST names), replace that
SINGLE line of text, then write the entire file back out to disk with that
single line changed. Tto do this with CFFILE, you would have to do some
looping through the file, looking for carriage returns, etc. This tag
removes the complexity and does it for you.


Thanks for the input...

--
Scot


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt 
 Robertson
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:34 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface
 
 
 Have you thought of giving users more control over the 
 process?  As in a db tie-in to tests, weights and actions?  I 
 use CF as well and I'm figuring on doing something that will 
 allow enablement of a particular test, or its disablement, 
 coupled to setting the test weight and action performed.  
 Should be fairly simple to use cffile to write out a Declude 
 file with the dangerous stuff hardcoded into it.  Probably 30 
 days away from having the time to finally do it.
 
 I get customization requests daily from this or that user.  
 Nobody wants the same thing.  Frankly I'm sick of hearing it 
 and am ready to turn the process over to the user and let 
 them have at it if they want to be the antispam genius.
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the 
 Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] AOL - EARTHLINK

2003-11-06 Thread Terry Parks
I'm still seeing mail bounced back for the above domains. It's not
consistent but I do see this message in my SMTP logs.

11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated
companies do not
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- authorize the use of its proprietary
computers and computer
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- networks to accept, transmit, or
distribute unsolicited bulk
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- e-mail sent from the internet.
Effective immediately:  AOL
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- may no longer accept connections from
IP addresses which
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220  have no reverse-DNS (PTR record)
assigned.

I did a reverse DNS check from DNSSTUFF.com with success.

Terry

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




Scot,

Nice job!

BTW, IMail managed passwords could be modified by way of a script.
There's a tool out there which will decrypt the passwords from your
registry, and I would imagine that you could sync that with your
database without having to convert IMail over to SQL, and hand off new
passwords by way of the built in IMail programs which are also used by
the Web mail products.

Try the following tool and run it with the command
"c:\path\extractUsers.exe -f c:\extractusers"

 http://dev.myownemail.com/Imail/ExtractUsers.htm

In the very least, you could parse the output files, or probably
redirect the output to your database at regular intervals or after
every password change???

Matt


Scot Desort wrote:

  I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow our customers to
self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and declude actions. It's
very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion, SQL
database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the text files to
disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice would be to have
it sync the password with the IMAIL password. I suppose one of these days I
will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL password storage, which
would solve the problem.

Your comments are welcomed:

http://spamwatch.njaccess.com

demo login
user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pw: spam

Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.

Thanks,


--
Scot


- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions


  
  

  Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The docs say that
  

  
  the
  
  

  white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just wanted to
  

  
  confirm
  
  

  it goes there and not global.cfg.
  

That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for incoming mail
only, and only applies to the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail and
per-user/per-domain files.

-Scott

  





---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL - EARTHLINK

2003-11-06 Thread R. Scott Perry

I'm still seeing mail bounced back for the above domains. It's not
consistent but I do see this message in my SMTP logs.
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220-America Online (AOL) and its affiliated 
companies do not
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- authorize the use of its proprietary 
computers and computer
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- networks to accept, transmit, or 
distribute unsolicited bulk
11:06 12:35 SMTP-(1E00) 220- e-mail sent from the internet
That message is a standard message that they send to everyone who tries 
sending mail to AOL.

I did a reverse DNS check from DNSSTUFF.com with success.
What do the further log file entries show?  Are there any errors in the 
further log file entries?

It may be that they are accepting the E-mail, but then later deleting it 
(AOL is known to do this).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Scot Desort
Thanks Matt. 

Geez, one time last year I searched the net endlessly for something like
that util. I came up with tons of stuff to extract users and domain lists,
and even old security exploits in Imail 4.x and 5.x that allowed you to
easily go into the registry and pull passwords out. But this util could be
the answer for me since it pulls passwords. I really didn't want to force
users to use 2 passwords, but I didn't want to hold up the interface being
released. And let's face it, many of them can't remember their email
password anyway since everything is autosaved. But I will look at this util.

Thanks again,

Scot



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


Scot,

Nice job!

BTW, IMail managed passwords could be modified by way of a script.  There's
a tool out there which will decrypt the passwords from your registry, and I
would imagine that you could sync that with your database without having to
convert IMail over to SQL, and hand off new passwords by way of the built in
IMail programs which are also used by the Web mail products.

Try the following tool and run it with the command c:\path\extractUsers.exe
-f c:\extractusers

http://dev.myownemail.com/Imail/ExtractUsers.htm

In the very least, you could parse the output files, or probably redirect
the output to your database at regular intervals or after every password
change???

Matt


Scot Desort wrote:

I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow our customers to
self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and declude actions. It's
very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion, SQL
database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the text files to
disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice would be to have
it sync the password with the IMAIL password. I suppose one of these days I
will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL password storage, which
would solve the problem.

Your comments are welcomed:

http://spamwatch.njaccess.com

demo login
user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pw: spam

Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.

Thanks,


--
Scot


- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions


  
Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The docs say that
  
the
  
white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just wanted to
  
confirm
  
it goes there and not global.cfg.
  
That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for incoming mail
only, and only applies to the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail and
per-user/per-domain files.

-Scott


--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail
mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread paul
 HA!
 Preach on my brother!lol..
 I am also an admin for an ISP, and i too am extremely suck of hearing
people
 complain about spam! like they could do a better job. :-P

Well, similar spot here, BUT I'm VERY leary of giving them any means to mess
up their mail. I'd probably spend more time troubleshooting their mistakes
than in what I do now. I don't need that added pain.  You KNOW it would
happen. I didn't know adding that to my filters would kill all my mail, can
you go in and fix it?

Paul


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?

2003-11-06 Thread Robert Forsyth
I have about 15...why?

Robert

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason (by way
of R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?


I was just wondering how many people here have a ColdFusion server at
their 
disposal.

Jason Wolfe
Lead Developer
Netcomm, Inc.
http://www.netcomm.com
(859) 224-4124

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Mike Gable



Hi. I've composed a 
simple but effective subject filter for non-alpha-num characters that are 
intended to obfuscate words and phrases. It is catching a lot more junk than 
before. My hold weight is 25 and delete is 35. Forgive me if this is an old 
idea. Here it is:

SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
~SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS `SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS !SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS 
@SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS #SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS $SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
%SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ^SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS 
*SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS (SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS )SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
-SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS _SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS +SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
=SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS |SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS \SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
{SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS }SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
]SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
"SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS 'SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS .SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
?SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS /


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




I've got one, but don't really use it. I much prefer ASP, if just for
the integration and stability.

Matt



Jason (by way of R. Scott Perry ) wrote:
I was
just wondering how many people here have a ColdFusion server at their
disposal.
  
  
Jason Wolfe
  
Lead Developer
  
Netcomm, Inc.
  
http://www.netcomm.com
  
(859) 224-4124
  






---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?

2003-11-06 Thread Keith Purtell
Me.

Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole 
use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please
contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason
 (by way of
 R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:43 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?


 I was just wondering how many people here have a ColdFusion
 server at their
 disposal.

 Jason Wolfe
 Lead Developer
 Netcomm, Inc.
 http://www.netcomm.com
 (859) 224-4124

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Pexicom - was one more try...

2003-11-06 Thread Gufler Markus
Great work Matthew! 
Have seen this type of messages from the IP block 207.251.96.201 ... 204 in the last 
10 days.


So I've added
 
207.251.96.200/29 [207.251.96.200] - [207.251.96.207] # mckinseyquarterly.com 

to your pexicom-ipfile.

Anyone knows www.mckinseyquarterly.com ?
Looks legit...  ?


Looks like this guy has invested a lot to create a big spam-engine

Maybe some Declude Pro users should set up a filter file to identify the X-JLH. So 
we could create gradually a more complete picture of this distributed spam processing 
tecnique.

PEXICOM-HEADER filter C:\IMail\Declude\filters\pexicom_header.txt x 5 0

And in the pexicom_header.txt file

HEADERS 0 CONTAINS X-JLH


---
Gufler Markus 
 
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Daniel Grotjan
Scot,
The web interface looks good.  I created something similar using ASP and a custom COM 
object I wrote.  I uses Imail rules instead of the individual junkmail files to 
process the mail based on weight test.  I implemented it about a month ago and so far 
we have over a thousand users using it and all of them are thrilled about it.  I don't 
have a demo set up, but I have a screenshot of it if you want to see.  
http://www.kimbanet.com/junkmail.jpg

Daniel
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 It  is  catching  a  lot more junk than before.

Checked your FPs lately?

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -

I get countless legit e-mails with hyphens in the Subject.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]

Mailing list e-mails very often use brackets in the Subject, so you're
giving more weight to an area that's already dangerous.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :

'Re:' gets a demerit?

 SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;

A perfectly legitimate punctuation mark.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 

We can't use quotation marks anymore?

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,

NO COMMAS???

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?

NO QUESTION MARKS???

I  place  approximately  zero  stock  in  tests  this general. YMMV, I
suppose.  Or  perhaps  you're  not  mentioning the aggregate threshold
you're going for before actual points are assigned.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Pete McNeil
Title: Message



Scott,
A good add-on test might be a count of punctuation characters in the 
subject. That would be very close to this suggestion but might be easier to use 
and require less processing.

In particular the drug  "member augmentation" folks are on a tear 
lately obfuscating subjects this way. In general a legit subject line seldom (if 
ever) has more than 3 punctuation marks. Obfuscated subjects can have higher 
than 20 and frequently have higher than 7.

Just a thought.

_M

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Mike GableSent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 
  4:53 PMTo: Declude (E-mail 2)Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  Non-alpha-numeric subject filter
  Hi. I've composed 
  a simple but effective subject filter for non-alpha-num characters that are 
  intended to obfuscate words and phrases. It is catching a lot more junk than 
  before. My hold weight is 25 and delete is 35. Forgive me if this is an old 
  idea. Here it is:
  
  SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
  ~SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS `SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS !SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS 
  @SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS #SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS $SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
  %SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ^SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS 
  *SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS (SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS )SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
  -SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS _SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS +SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
  =SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS |SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS \SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
  {SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS }SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
  ]SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
  "SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS 'SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
  SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS .SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
  ?SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS /


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)









Some of those are going to have a large FP
rate. 





John Tolmachoff

Engineer/Consultant/Owner

eServices For You







-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Gable
Sent: Thursday,
 November 06, 2003 1:53 PM
To: Declude (E-mail 2)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Non-alpha-numeric subject filter





Hi. I've composed a simple but effective subject filter for
non-alpha-num characters that are intended to obfuscate words and phrases. It
is catching a lot more junk than before. My hold weight is 25 and delete is 35.
Forgive me if this is an old idea. Here it is:











SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ~
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS `
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS !
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS @
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS #
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS $
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS %
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ^
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS *
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS (
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS )
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS _
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS +
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS =
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS |
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS \
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS {
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS }
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS '
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS .
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS /












RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Jason Newland
Would you be interested in sharing this. It looks great!

Thanks!

Jason


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Grotjan
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


Scot,
The web interface looks good.  I created something similar using ASP and
a custom COM object I wrote.  I uses Imail rules instead of the
individual junkmail files to process the mail based on weight test.  I
implemented it about a month ago and so far we have over a thousand
users using it and all of them are thrilled about it.  I don't have a
demo set up, but I have a screenshot of it if you want to see.
http://www.kimbanet.com/junkmail.jpg

Daniel
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?

2003-11-06 Thread ISPhuset Nordic / Benny Samuelsen
Me to :-) 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli
Sent: 6. november 2003 23:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I do.

Fred
- Original Message -
From: Jason (by way of R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?


 I was just wondering how many people here have a ColdFusion server at
their
 disposal.

 Jason Wolfe
 Lead Developer
 Netcomm, Inc.
 http://www.netcomm.com
 (859) 224-4124

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Very Nice.

Burzin

At 12:27 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow our customers to
self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and declude actions. It's
very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion, SQL
database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the text files to
disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice would be to have
it sync the password with the IMAIL password. I suppose one of these days I
will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL password storage, which
would solve the problem.
Your comments are welcomed:

http://spamwatch.njaccess.com

demo login
user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pw: spam
Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.

Thanks,

--
Scot
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions

 Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The docs say that
the
 white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just wanted to
confirm
 it goes there and not global.cfg.

 That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for incoming mail
 only, and only applies to the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail and
 per-user/per-domain files.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
--
Burzin Sumariwalla   Phone: (314) 994-9411 x291
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax:   (314) 997-7615
  Pager: (314) 407-3345
Networking and Telecommunications Manager
Information Technology Services
St. Louis County Library District
1640 S. Lindbergh Blvd.
St. Louis, MO  63131 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
We have similar tests set up, less the {}[]

We set a weight of 1 for each mark; expect o have many emails that will
fail one or two instances of this test - no problem;  it's the latest
craze with subjects like 

m'ake my d#ay b:etter by b+locking my$ e*mail

That get caught with this, as they should...


Sincerely,

Randy Armbrecht
Global Web SolutionsR, Inc.
804-346-5300 ext. 1
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) ext. 1
http://globalweb.net 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:16 PM
To: Mike Gable
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter


 It  is  catching  a  lot more junk than before.

Checked your FPs lately?

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -

I get countless legit e-mails with hyphens in the Subject.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]

Mailing list e-mails very often use brackets in the Subject, so you're
giving more weight to an area that's already dangerous.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :

'Re:' gets a demerit?

 SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;

A perfectly legitimate punctuation mark.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 

We can't use quotation marks anymore?

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,

NO COMMAS???

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?

NO QUESTION MARKS???

I  place  approximately  zero  stock  in  tests  this general. YMMV, I
suppose.  Or  perhaps  you're  not  mentioning the aggregate threshold
you're going for before actual points are assigned.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This message was Virus Scanned by GlobalWeb.net]


---
[This message was Virus Scanned by GlobalWeb.net]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Pexicom - was one more try...

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble
Gufler,

I think you actually identified Cheetah Mail with that block.  Here's 
what SenderBase has for that range:

   
http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchString=207.251.96.200whichOthers=%2F24

I would highly advise not blocking Cheetah Mail, at least 
indiscriminately.  They do have a pretty good opt-in policy for their 
member companies, and they serve only the largest such companies.  
Although one of the companies using their services might have opted 
users in inappropriately, that typically isn't the case with them.  Same 
goes for Dart Mail and a few others.

The header search for that  X-JLH: string though did expose another 
large block of addresses for Pexicom, one in fact that I had been 
collecting IP's for blocking outside of this hunt.  Now that I am giving 
this stuff so much weight, and deleting at those weights, the remaining 
stuff that comes through is easy to identify.  So I've added the 
following blocks.  You will probably recognize the domains listed in the 
updated file (at the top).

   64.124.165.0/25 [64.124.165.0] - [64.124.165.127]
   64.124.165.128/26 [64.124.165.128] - [64.124.165.191]
   64.124.165.192/27 [64.124.165.192] - [64.124.165.223]
   64.125.181.0/24 [64.125.181.0] - [64.125.181.255]
It seems that both ranges, especially the class C, are used without 
reverse DNS sometimes, and the names seem to change.  The class C is 
also the range that they have listed on SBL, and it's not by any means 
defunct.  This guy has about 1,000 IP's at his disposal to spam from, 
and he consistantly makes use of a lot of them to send out what I term 
contest spam.

Note that after the CIDR range, those are effectively comments in an 
IPFILE, and they will show up in your logs or headers if you use WARN 
(no need to add a # symbol).

I've attached a new version of the filter.  Some might want to block at 
the router or IMail to save on processing.  He's probably up to 5% of my 
mail volume with these additions.

Matt



Gufler Markus wrote:

Great work Matthew! 
Have seen this type of messages from the IP block 207.251.96.201 ... 204 in the last 10 days.

So I've added

207.251.96.200/29 [207.251.96.200] - [207.251.96.207] # mckinseyquarterly.com 

to your pexicom-ipfile.

Anyone knows www.mckinseyquarterly.com ?
Looks legit...  ?
Looks like this guy has invested a lot to create a big spam-engine

Maybe some Declude Pro users should set up a filter file to identify the X-JLH. So we could create gradually a more complete picture of this distributed spam processing tecnique.

PEXICOM-HEADER filter C:\IMail\Declude\filters\pexicom_header.txt x 5 0

And in the pexicom_header.txt file

HEADERS 0 CONTAINS X-JLH

---
Gufler Markus 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

--
===
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===


Pexicom.zip
Description: Zip compressed data


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Title: Message









SpamCheck already does that.





John Tolmachoff

Engineer/Consultant/Owner

eServices For You







-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Thursday,
 November 06, 2003 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Non-alpha-numeric subject filter





Scott,





A good add-on
test might be a count of punctuation characters in the subject. That would be
very close to this suggestion but might be easier to use and require less
processing.











In particular the
drug  member augmentation folks are on a tear lately
obfuscating subjects this way. In general a legit subject line seldom (if ever)
has more than 3 punctuation marks. Obfuscated subjects can have higher than 20
and frequently have higher than 7.











Just a thought.











_M





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Gable
Sent: Thursday,
 November 06, 2003 4:53 PM
To: Declude (E-mail 2)
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Non-alpha-numeric subject filter



Hi. I've composed a simple but effective subject filter for
non-alpha-num characters that are intended to obfuscate words and phrases. It
is catching a lot more junk than before. My hold weight is 25 and delete is 35.
Forgive me if this is an old idea. Here it is:











SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ~
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS `
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS !
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS @
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS #
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS $
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS %
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ^
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS *
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS (
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS )
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS _
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS +
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS =
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS |
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS \
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS {
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS }
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS '
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS .
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS /














[Declude.JunkMail] FORGEDHELO-FQDN

2003-11-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Wouldn't it be better to use ENDSWITH rather than IS?

Example, if the office domain is mail.123domain.com, IS would not catch a
HELO of 123domain.com.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message



I 
question the importance tomake the interface "cross platform" - when the 
tool that you are managing (Imail and Declude) are Windows specific? I'd 
personally rather use the web server that is already optimized for that 
environment and offers me plenty of control: IIS.


  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Pete McNeilSent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 
  05:35 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?
  OT - sort of.
  
  We do most of our heavy web work in Java/JSP.We've tossed around 
  the idea of building a Java app that would accept HTTP connections (perhaps on 
  an alternate port) and provide an interface to Declude  other spam 
  management tools for users  admins.
  
  Our development schedule is _very_ full, but if there is a significant 
  interest in this I couldexplore shifting some effort in that 
  direction.
  
  As a dedicated Java app it would be cross-platform compatible (in 
  theory), relatively secure, lightweight,and could be configured to run 
  along side any web services that might be present (such as KWM). In an IMail 
  environment we could even present a postini-like interface for users to 
  "release" their held spam - and generate accurate false positive reporting in 
  the process, etc... (these are the ideas we have 
anyway...)
  
  Thoughts?
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew 
BrambleSent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:46 PMTo: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: 
Do you use ColdFusion?I've got one, but don't really 
use it. I much prefer ASP, if just for the integration and 
stability.Matt


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




I'm not sure that I totally followed you, however I think I know where
you are going with that. FP reporting is important to your product,
and anything that could make the process easier would benefit all of
your users, even if some didn't use it.

Speaking for myself and from my perception of what I have seen, I think
my approach to management of such things, while not totally out of the
ordinary, is unique, and I have the same perception of most here.
While I have Web-mail (KWM), I don't use it except for spam reviewing,
and my users hardly use it at all. Over time I expect to be doing a
lot more gateway spam blocking, in which case a setup for managing such
domains would need to be quite different since they aren't locally
hosted, but locally managed. The real usefulness might be in single
domain installations.

Maybe I'm not following what you are getting at though. It might be
real nice though to come up with a plug-in for reporting spam and false
positives in the mail client, or at least the Web-mail client. If I
chose to report spam from a Web mail client for instance, it will munge
the HTML stuff and you could lose some important data for processing.
Having the original header information would also be quite useful for a
dual match with the body URL for your filtering (this has given me some
issues in my trial and forces me to score low in the event of forwarded
content from legit users). Don't get me wrong though, by in large, I'm
very impressed with your architecture after three days of trialing your
product.

Matt



Pete McNeil wrote:

  
  Message
  
  OT - sort of.
  
  We do most of our heavy web work in
Java/JSP.We've tossed around the idea of building a Java app that
would accept HTTP connections (perhaps on an alternate port) and
provide an interface to Declude  other spam management tools for
users  admins.
  
  Our development schedule is _very_ full, but
if there is a significant interest in this I couldexplore shifting
some effort in that direction.
  
  As a dedicated Java app it would be
cross-platform compatible (in theory), relatively secure,
lightweight,and could be configured to run along side any web services
that might be present (such as KWM). In an IMail environment we could
even present a postini-like interface for users to "release" their held
spam - and generate accurate false positive reporting in the process,
etc... (these are the ideas we have anyway...)
  
  Thoughts?
  
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew
Bramble
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?


I've got one, but don't really use it. I much prefer ASP, if just for
the integration and stability.

Matt



Jason (by way of R. Scott Perry ) wrote:

I was just wondering how many people here have a
ColdFusion server at their disposal. 
  
Jason Wolfe 
Lead Developer 
Netcomm, Inc. 
  http://www.netcomm.com
  
(859) 224-4124 


--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the
Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The
archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


-- 
===
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Mike Gable
Sandy, I think you're missing the point.

My weighting system has enough slop in it to allow for some points to be
given to legitimate senders. Even the Declude JunkMail list now gets 4
points for having [ and ] in the subject, but it still comes through fine.
If we try to prevent all false positives we get a lot of junk in our
inboxes. I don't need this filter to have most list emails held for review.
The shoot-first-ask-questions-later RBLs do an excellent job of flagging
legitimate email as SPAM all by themselves. My weights are low enough to
make little or no difference with legitimate emails.

It's these that will get held:

What is G.E.N.ERIC VI.A.G.R.A?   (16 points)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 75% D1SC0UNT!! nisbabct jvvjhgyxmk   (22 points)

Helpful suggestions are appreciated, but ridicule is not.

Mike


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:16 PM
To: Mike Gable
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter


 It  is  catching  a  lot more junk than before.

Checked your FPs lately?

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -

I get countless legit e-mails with hyphens in the Subject.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]

Mailing list e-mails very often use brackets in the Subject, so you're
giving more weight to an area that's already dangerous.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :

'Re:' gets a demerit?

 SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;

A perfectly legitimate punctuation mark.

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 

We can't use quotation marks anymore?

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,

NO COMMAS???

 SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?

NO QUESTION MARKS???

I  place  approximately  zero  stock  in  tests  this general. YMMV, I
suppose.  Or  perhaps  you're  not  mentioning the aggregate threshold
you're going for before actual points are assigned.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] What test?

2003-11-06 Thread Glen Harvy
Hi,

Is there a test I can implement that will pick this up .

X-Note: This E-mail was sent from (timeout) ([68.37.149.251])

_
Glen Harvy 
Aquarius Communications
for all your Internet Needs.
Phone 9977 3788 Fax 9977 3844
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




FYI, I have seen too many false positives with filters that can
increment scores on multiple matches for me to feel comfortable with
them. It would be nice if Declude would allow for an upper limit to
scoring such things, but in this event, I might suggest changing to a
fixed score for the filter. This was certainly the biggest issue with
the filter that was shared originally with the thread.

Matt



GlobalWeb.net Webmaster wrote:

  We have similar tests set up, less the {}[]

We set a weight of 1 for each mark; expect o have many emails that will
fail one or two instances of this test - no problem;  it's the latest
craze with subjects like 

m'ake my d#ay b:etter by b+locking my$ e*mail

That get caught with this, as they should...


Sincerely,

Randy Armbrecht
Global Web SolutionsR, Inc.
804-346-5300 ext. 1
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) ext. 1
http://globalweb.net 




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:16 PM
To: Mike Gable
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter


  
  
It  is  catching  a  lot more junk than before.

  
  
Checked your FPs lately?

  
  
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -

  
  
I get countless legit e-mails with hyphens in the Subject.

  
  
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]

  
  
Mailing list e-mails very often use brackets in the Subject, so you're
giving more weight to an area that's already dangerous.

  
  
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :

  
  
'Re:' gets a demerit?

  
  
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;

  
  
A perfectly legitimate punctuation mark.

  
  
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS "

  
  
We can't use quotation marks anymore?

  
  
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,

  
  
NO COMMAS???

  
  
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?

  
  
NO QUESTION MARKS???

I  place  approximately  zero  stock  in  tests  this general. YMMV, I
suppose.  Or  perhaps  you're  not  mentioning the aggregate threshold
you're going for before actual points are assigned.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This message was Virus Scanned by GlobalWeb.net]


---
[This message was Virus Scanned by GlobalWeb.net]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  


-- 
===
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?

2003-11-06 Thread John Moore
Us too!
John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Forsyth
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?


I have about 15...why?

Robert

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason (by way
of R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?


I was just wondering how many people here have a ColdFusion server at
their
disposal.

Jason Wolfe
Lead Developer
Netcomm, Inc.
http://www.netcomm.com
(859) 224-4124

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




Looks like the first try to send was also blocked, so this time the
offensive content is going in a zip. Here's the repost:

I collected a list representing examples of this obfuscation
technique. The first set is all from one spammer (the pill guy that
has a huge volume of crud spam hitting everyone, and sometimes it does
get through based on how clean his IP is):

 (see zip file)

The second set is from other randomized crap spam. There are various
techniques used here:

 (see zip file)

I would hate to target just one spammer with a heavy filter
(necessary
in order to help protect from FP's), and certainly you can't tag all of
this stuff. One of my thoughts would be to just look for non-english
characters, and strings with a letter then only certain special
characters and then another letter, and score low. The only problem is
that 26 x 26 = 676 combinations for just one special character three
character combo. So some system of limiting the letter choices would
be wise, for instance, you could limit the strings to just the 15 most
popular letters and eliminate doubles, which would be only 225
combinations per special character, and then choose just 5 or so
special characters. On a subject search, that should be doable. Any
volunteers for finding the 15 most popular letters? I'll be happy to
code it up with a little help.

BTW, spammers using the first type of word obfuscation are also quite
likely to use other types, and fail tests like GIBBERISH, GIBBERISHSUB,
OBFUSCATION, DYNAMIC, FOREIGN, Y!DIRECTED, etc. Very little of this
stuff gets through our filters because these filters do such a good job
at crud detection.

Matt



Kami Razvan wrote:

  
  
  
  
  Hi;
  We tried this idea with words but it became way too long..
  Perhaps this can be used with an ANTI approach like Matt's
filters.
  Something like:
  SUBJECT -2 ENDSWITH !
  SUBJECT -4 CONTAINS 's
  So the filters could be cancelled for correct usage. But
again this will have high FP's.
  Regards,
  Kami
  
  
  
  From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)
  Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:40 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject
filter
  
  
  
  Some of
those are going to have a large FP rate. 
  
  
  John
Tolmachoff
  Engineer/Consultant/Owner
  eServices
For You
  
  
  
  -Original
Message-
  From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Gable
  Sent: Thursday, November 06,
2003 1:53 PM
  To: Declude (E-mail 2)
  Subject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter
  
  
  Hi. I've composed a
simple but effective subject filter for non-alpha-num characters that
are intended to obfuscate words and phrases. It is catching a lot more
junk than before. My hold weight is 25 and delete is 35. Forgive me if
this is an old idea. Here it is:
  
  
  
  
  
  SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ~
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS `
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS !
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS @
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS #
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS $
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS %
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS ^
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS *
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS (
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS )
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS -
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS _
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS +
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS =
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS |
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS \
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS {
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS }
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS [
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ]
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS :
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS ;
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS "
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS '
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 6 CONTAINS 
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ,
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS .
SUBJECT 2 CONTAINS ?
SUBJECT 4 CONTAINS /
  
  
  






Subject_Randomization.zip
Description: Zip compressed data


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FORGEDHELO-FQDN

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble
Sometimes you have domains where the external admins will set up scripts 
and other SMTP capable devices to send out from your domain, to which 
you have no control over.  Since IMail will only accept the configured 
domain and listed aliases, I make my lists up to be exclusive to this, 
knowing that I won't FP on customer specified settings in their devices.

If there is no possibility of this sort of thing happening, then 
ENDSWITH would be easier, absolutely, but the more precise, the less 
chance for an FP, and I haven't seen any examples where the spammer will 
forge your domain in HELO with a sub-domain in front of it (though I'm 
sure that is possible).

FYI for others, this is a discussion related to the attached filter that 
hasn't been published except on this list.  I have very good results 
with this as well as another one that scores E-mails reporting 
themselves to be named with your IP addresses in HELO (customize for 
your own domains) which is clearly spam.

Matt



John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:

Wouldn't it be better to use ENDSWITH rather than IS?

Example, if the office domain is mail.123domain.com, IS would not catch a
HELO of 123domain.com.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
 


# FORGEDHELO-FQDN
# Last Update: 09/23/2003
#
# Description:
# This filter is designed to detect senders that forge the Fully Qualified Domain Name 
(FQDN) in
# use on the mail server.
#
# Usage:
# Based on a fail weight of 10.
#
# -Global.cfg-
# FORGEDHELO-FQDN   filter  C:\IMail\Declude\ForgedHELO-FQDN.txt   
 x   7   0
#
# False Positives:
# Scoring false positives will primarily come from hardware or software with built-in 
SMTP
# capabilities for sending automated notifications which are configured either by 
default
# or by configuration to use the name of the mail host.  Mail clients on computers 
using
# the FQDN of the mail server as their computer name can also produce false positives.


# Counterbalances:
# Negative weighting is applied for Netscape and Mozilla mail clients which use the 
domain name
# listed in the From address.  Counterbalancing is not necessary if all local users are
# configured to use SMTP AUTH, and Declude is configured for WHITELIST AUTH (v1.76+) in
# combinationwith IMail 8+.
#
# Test Exclusions:
# Messages containing the Netscape/Mozilla marker in the headers.

HEADERS -7  CONTAINSmozilla


# Filter Matches:
# Looks for FQDN's configured on the server.  Domains should be listed as they appear 
in E-mail
# addresses as well as how they appear in MX records.  Explicit matching (IS) should 
be used in
# order to prevent false positives.
#
# A good tool for generating a list of domains that you serve is ExtractUsers which is 
found at
# http://dev.myownemail.com/Imail/ExtractUsers.htm , placed in c:\extractusers\ 
directory, and
# run from the command line with c:\extractUsers\extractUsers.exe -f 
c:\extractusers.  This will
# output a file called Domains.txt among other things which can be used to create a 
list of
# domains for use in this filter.

#HELO   0   IS  example.com
#HELO   0   IS  mail.example.com# FORGEDHELO-IP
# Last Update: 09/23/2003
#
# Description:
# This filter is designed to detect senders that forge the receiving mail server's IP 
in
# the HELO as the name of the sending server.  There are no valid reasons to forge a 
local
# IP, and therefore this test should be scored for automatic rejection.
#
# Usage:
# Based on a fail weight of 10.
#
# -Global.cfg-
# FORGEDHELO-IP filter  C:\IMail\Declude\ForgedHELO-IP.txt 
 x   15  0
#
# False Positives:
# Intra-network software configured improperly to use the IP as the hostname in HELO.  
Dimac
# JMail and MIME::Lite have shown this behavior.


# Counterbalances:
# Negative weighting is applied for intra-network devices, software or Web sites that 
by
# default use or are configured to use an IP in a ranges defined in this filter.
#
# Test Exclusions:
# None by default.

#HELO   -15 CONTAINSx.x.x.x


# Filter Matches:
# IP addresses that are configured for use on the mail server.  CIDR ranges may not be 
used
# as this filter is designed to detect text strings and not actual addresses.  Class C 
ranges
# can be specified by leaving off the trailing octet.  The reserved localhost address 
is also
# included.

#HELO   0   CONTAINSx.x.x.  (whole Class C)
#HELO   0   CONTAINSx.x.x.x (single addresses)

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Sheldon Koehler
I am not a programmer by any stretch of the word! Bit I would love to see a
user interface and a domain interface for Declude Junkmail that works from
the KWM menus. I have tossed around this idea before but always get
distracted with other projects. I do not remember who (I could search my
email...) I talked to this past spring, but someone was working on this I
think. I never heard anything more so I never followed up (my own fault).

We host about 150 domains on our Imail server. There are about 5000
mailboxes on it. I spend a couple hours per day tweaking settings answering
Spam related email and tracking down FP's. If I could offload some of this
on the users in a way that would be easy for them, I would love it!

The Auto Whitelist is OK, but we have had several people put [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
then complain they are getting tons of Spam. I did like Scot's interface, as
it was simple and clean but having user remember another password would not
be a good option. And since our KWM sees a lot of use, having the menus
there would be easy for users to find it.


Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] High Traffic Windows tweaks

2003-11-06 Thread Frederick Samarelli
The TCP TIME_WAIT  adjustment works great.


- Original Message - 
From: Adrian Hauri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:57 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] High Traffic Windows tweaks


 For those out there who run a high traffic mailserver

 I just found this article:
 http://www.stalker.com/CommuniGatePro/Scalability.html#TimeWait

 Summary:
 - It is recommended to change the TCP TIME_WAIT time in the windows
registry
 from 180 seconds to 20-30 seconds .
 - The Windows system limits the maximum number port number assigned to
 outgoing connections. By default this value is 5000. You may want to
 increase that value to 20,000 or more, by adding the MaxUserPort
DWORD-type
 value to the
 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters,
 key.

 Please let me (and the list) know if you experience a performance
increase.

 Cheers

 Adrian

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Pete McNeil


If I read you right, you might be interested in a java applet that can be
tied into KWM or even built into a web page you develop... perhaps using
page based JS to gather message details to feed to the applet... It
sounds like a lot of complexity but it's worth looking in that direction.
The applet would be able to make specialized HTTP calls back to the same
server (security restrictions) - and that server could respond using IIS,
CF, or whatever was handy. We do http tunneling like this all the time -
so the question then would be, if a toolbox applet like this existed,
with a well published API, then what tools should/would it contain?

(This is getting far, far off topic unless it quickly leads to a list of
Declude centric adjustments that might be supported in the applet
provided UI... sorry for the ot - Please feel free to contact me off list
if it heads further ot.)
_M
At 06:08 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
I'm not sure that I totally
followed you, however I think I know where you are going with that.
FP reporting is important to your product, and anything that could make
the process easier would benefit all of your users, even if some didn't
use it.

Speaking for myself and from my perception of what I have seen, I think
my approach to management of such things, while not totally out of the
ordinary, is unique, and I have the same perception of most here.
While I have Web-mail (KWM), I don't use it except for spam reviewing,
and my users hardly use it at all. Over time I expect to be doing a
lot more gateway spam blocking, in which case a setup for managing such
domains would need to be quite different since they aren't locally
hosted, but locally managed. The real usefulness might be in single
domain installations.
Maybe I'm not following what you are getting at though. It might be
real nice though to come up with a plug-in for reporting spam and false
positives in the mail client, or at least the Web-mail client. If I
chose to report spam from a Web mail client for instance, it will munge
the HTML stuff and you could lose some important data for
processing. Having the original header information would also be
quite useful for a dual match with the body URL for your filtering (this
has given me some issues in my trial and forces me to score low in the
event of forwarded content from legit users). Don't get me wrong
though, by in large, I'm very impressed with your architecture after
three days of trialing your product.
Matt

Pete McNeil wrote:
OT -
sort of.

We do most of our heavy web work in
Java/JSP. We've tossed around the idea of building a Java app that would
accept HTTP connections (perhaps on an alternate port) and provide an
interface to Declude  other spam management tools for users 
admins.

Our development schedule is _very_ full, but
if there is a significant interest in this I could explore shifting some
effort in that direction.

As a dedicated Java app it would be
cross-platform compatible (in theory), relatively secure, lightweight,
and could be configured to run along side any web services that might be
present (such as KWM). In an IMail environment we could even present a
postini-like interface for users to release their held spam -
and generate accurate false positive reporting in the process, etc...
(these are the ideas we have anyway...)

Thoughts?
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?
I've got one, but don't really use it. I much prefer ASP, if just for the integration and stability.
Matt

Jason (by way of R. Scott Perry ) wrote:
I was just wondering how many people here have a ColdFusion server at their disposal. 
Jason Wolfe 
Lead Developer 
Netcomm, Inc. 
http://www.netcomm.com 
(859) 224-4124 
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

-- 
===
Matthew S. Bramble
President and Technical Coordinator
iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com
---
Office Phone: (518) 862-9042
Cellular: (518) 229-3375
Fax: (518) 862-9044
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Not scanning outgoing

2003-11-06 Thread R. Scott Perry

Just as a test, I'd like to make sure we're not scanning outgoing messages 
(temporarily).  Besides commenting out the tests on outgoing, is there 
something else to do?
That's all you need to do.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IPBYPASSing IP range?

2003-11-06 Thread R. Scott Perry

Is there any way to list entire IP ranges for IPBYPASS?
No.  Only single IPs can be listed currently.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Pete McNeil
At 07:16 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
 As a dedicated Java app it would be cross-platform compatible (in
 theory), relatively secure, lightweight, and could be configured to run
 along side any web services that might be present (such as KWM). In an
 IMail environment we could even present a postini-like interface for
 users to release their held spam - and generate accurate false
 positive reporting in the process, etc... (these are the ideas we have
 anyway...)

 Thoughts?
How much and when will it be ready? ;-)


:-) ... now where did I put that magic wand, and then I've got to find the 
money tree, give that a shake,... eye of newt...

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




Well, on that topic...

I've taken note of your FP reporting procedure and it doesn't mesh well
with my environment since I capture to accounts that I only access
through Web mail (and so do a lot of people here). Your system
requires that users send reports from their registered addresses. Now,
being a trial user, I'm not certain about the details since it's not
available to me.

Even if I was to download messages to my client, I use Netscape Mail,
and replies and forwards don't include the header information, and my
thought is that this is important for your system to track. I noted a
false positive recently in my capture account for an opt-in members
dieting newsletter and I forwarded it to the intended recipient to ask
if it was in fact wanted/requested, and it was, but even on my forward,
Message Sniffer tagged it because of the URL in the body. I think that
this exposes a weakness of just simply tagging URL's as a one-to-one
match, and maybe that weakness is related to how you gather information
from your customers, or rather the limitations of how you gather.
Having the headers would allow matching senders to URL's on a lot of
spam and avoid many false positives, and simplify tagging of some
static spammers by just doing IP's and avoiding the content. Because
URL content alone can trigger your system, I must weight it lower than
Declude's default settings, but in my environment it is still effective
enough to have a noticeable impact, but I expect to see a few more FP's
as a result. Declude's WHITELIST AUTH should stop the FP's on
intra-server traffic when I upgrade to IMail 8, but there will still be
some coming from individuals forwarding banned content from other
servers. 

I'm not a SpamCop member, but someone here referenced a plug-in for
Outlook which makes reporting spam to them just a simple press of a
button. I would imagine that they can capture the full message that
way and not just the body, and because it's simpler to do, they
probably get a lot more submissions. That was the basis for that part
of my original comments.

One thing that I have been exploring on my service is to embed
something in the messages, headers or otherwise, which gives a
reporting mechanism with some details of the message, though this would
be limited to just some header information in this environment. I
would need to set it up so that only certain users could access this
functionality, and if I could do it HTTP based, I could create a
non-published domain which would need to be configured on a local DNS
server or in the Windows host file so that resolution would work. I
could also If I wanted to, send non-customers to a different version of
the site, which would be effective for bounce messages for instance. I
suppose that embedding a script by way of a URL might be a way to go,
displaying some buttons in the event that DNS resolution works on these
specially configured networks and machines. I'm just tossing that out
in case it inspires you in any way.

The gist of what you were floating originally though seemed to be
remote management of Declude, and I just don't know that an app such as
Declude, which is so customizable, and changes so frequently, has a
realistic opportunity for full admin functionality without Scott
providing the framework, and per user settings seem to be best done by
way of an interface to IMail's rules and tagging the headers with
Declude, which is a kludge with no standardization (though it most
definitely works and it overcomes the multiple recipient shortcomings
of the environment).

Maybe I'm still misunderstanding you though, so if there was some
specific feedback that you were after, feel free to ask again :)

Thanks,

Matt



Pete McNeil wrote:
If I
read you right, you might be interested in a java applet that can be
tied into KWM or even built into a web page you develop... perhaps
using
page based JS to gather message details to feed to the applet... It
sounds like a lot of complexity but it's worth looking in that
direction.
The applet would be able to make specialized HTTP calls back to the
same
server (security restrictions) - and that server could respond using
IIS,
CF, or whatever was handy. We do http tunneling like this all the time
-
so the question then would be, if a toolbox applet like this existed,
with a well published API, then what tools should/would it contain?
  
  
(This is getting far, far off topic unless it quickly leads to a list
of
Declude centric adjustments that might be supported in the applet
provided UI... sorry for the ot - Please feel free to contact me off
list
if it heads further ot.)
  
_M
  
At 06:08 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
  I'm not sure that I
totally
followed you, however I think I know where you are going with that.
FP reporting is important to your product, and anything that could make
the process easier would benefit all of your users, even if some didn't
use it.

Speaking for myself and from my perception of what I have seen, I 

[Declude.JunkMail] Not doing sender actions: 0

2003-11-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I just implemented a new configuration for a client and am seeing that line
for each message in the JM log.

I have not seen that one before. Log is in MID.

Correct actions are being taken.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble
I've thought about the idea of building a digest notification app for 
Declude which allows users to retrieve held messages, change 
notification intervals, whitelist senders (and manage them), and allow 
for users to set their individual spam blocking level.  Again though, 
the last two parts requires some integration with IMail rules, and 
exceptions can be messy (how to handle messages to aliases that were 
held), and they wouldn't work in the same regard for gatewayed E-mail.

I'm throwing this out here because if I ever get to this, it will 
probably be a long time and difficult to support as a for-sale 
application.  It would be absolutely killer though, and it would 
dramatically reduce the need for administrators to do monitoring.  It 
also would remind the customer of how much spam we are blocking, and 
give them some control without messing up our Declude setup with endless 
customizations.

I'd gladly pay for something that worked.

Matt



Pete McNeil wrote:

One piece of what I had in mind was a gadget to look through the spam 
folder, and pull out a list of the messages held for a given user. If 
the user decides they want that message (based on from  subject) then 
the utility would send it back into the spool for delivery and make an 
appropriate (and detailed) fp report - perhaps also taking some 
automated tuning actions.

(The cross - platform part means that messages held on a Postfix box 
could also be handled this way - with a few under-the-cover tweaks. 
This would be seamless to the end user and might also work for other 
platforms if it's done in a clean modular way.)

Other parts of the utility would put a pretty face on global, domain, 
 user specific settings in Declude (if any). Again, in a modular way 
- probably switched on and off based on the user that is logged in. 
Here again, some modular design might make the tool portable to other 
environments... but that's a secondary concern.

Does that sound like something in line with your thinking?

Anyway it's a non-trivial project, so it's going to take some pushing 
to move it forward. Strong interest (if it appears) would help.

_M

At 07:14 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:

I am not a programmer by any stretch of the word! Bit I would love to 
see a
user interface and a domain interface for Declude Junkmail that works 
from
the KWM menus. I have tossed around this idea before but always get
distracted with other projects. I do not remember who (I could search my
email...) I talked to this past spring, but someone was working on 
this I
think. I never heard anything more so I never followed up (my own 
fault).

We host about 150 domains on our Imail server. There are about 5000
mailboxes on it. I spend a couple hours per day tweaking settings 
answering
Spam related email and tracking down FP's. If I could offload some of 
this
on the users in a way that would be easy for them, I would love it!

The Auto Whitelist is OK, but we have had several people put 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
then complain they are getting tons of Spam. I did like Scot's 
interface, as
it was simple and clean but having user remember another password 
would not
be a good option. And since our KWM sees a lot of use, having the menus
there would be easy for users to find it.

Sheldon

Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Non-alpha-numeric subject filter

2003-11-06 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 Sandy, I think you're missing the point.

I don't think so.

A Subject with a pair of [square brackets] in it is alone, practically
speaking,  a  0%  indicator  of  spam,  unless  your  mail  traffic is
separately  insured  against  such incidents (which I doubt it is). As
such, it should comprise 0% of your spam weight.

In  the  same fashion, just having a Subject that ends with a question
mark  is  probably  a .0001% indicator of spam, so you cannot reliably
assign more than .0001% ~= 0% of your spam weight to it.

What you need to make most of your single character filter effective
is  a  threshold  above  which a fixed or computed aggregate weight is
assigned,  and  below  which  NO  weight is assigned. Declude does not
presently  allow  for this, though it's been in the suggestion box for
some  time.  I'm not saying that there aren't *some* single characters
that  deserve  some weight--note that I only quoted about half of your
message in mine.

 Even  the Declude JunkMail list now gets 4 points for having [ and ]
 in the subject, but it still comes through fine.

And  what  number  of  spam messages are you really catching with that
part  of the filter? What happens when one of your users subscribes to
a listserv that has a few other marks against it (REVDNS, et al.), and
then  those  four points push it over the top, while not really having
any real effect in the other direction?

 If we try to prevent all false positives we get a lot of junk in our
 inboxes.

I do not approve of any false positives that prevent message delivery.
Individual  components  in  a weighted system like Declude's that have
high  sensitivity are not false positives in their own right. But when
the  components are disproportionately insensitive to legitimate mail,
they will inevitably lead to FPs in final weighting.

 I  don't  need this filter to have most list emails held for review.

*Most*  list e-mails? We don't have this issue, and if we did, none of
our  clients  would retain us. It's unacceptable for us to assume that
mass  dispatches are not business-critical simply because they are not
person-to-person. Your site's mileage, I note again, may vary; I guess
you're  right  that if you're already HOLDing list e-mails as a normal
thing, holding with a higher weight won't mean much.

 My  weights  are  low  enough  to  make little or no difference with
 legitimate emails.

Doesn't look that way to me. The only weights we assign are those that
have  a  statistically significant chance of being spam. While some of
your  single-character  filters are just fine, the ones I commented on
do not, in my estimation.

 It's these that will get held:

 What is G.E.N.ERIC VI.A.G.R.A?   (16 points)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 75% D1SC0UNT!! nisbabct jvvjhgyxmk   (22 points)

Well,  yes,  if you're using your single-character obfuscation test as
your ONLY Declude test, that's true. But I was not assuming that you'd
chosen  such  a  limited  implementation. I state again that what most
sites  need--maybe  not  yours,  by a stroke of luck--is an all-in-one
test  with  intelligently computed weight, such as SPAMCHK or SNIFFER,
and  not trying to make Declude's FILTER test more sensitive than it's
designed to be.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Processing time

2003-11-06 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
At what log level does Declude record the total processing time?

Or how can I otherwise find out the processing time per message?

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Sheldon Koehler
 I'd gladly pay for something that worked.

I did not expect it for free. I have the KWM price in mind as a point I
could get my partners to go for. Any higher than this and it would be a very
hard sell for me. So this means a lot of people need to be interested in it!

Our local competition uses Postini. And I have lost a few customers over to
them as people do seem to like that interface. However, I have thrown out
the security thing to muddy the waters ;-) We do not send their email
out to someone else's servers... I let them draw their own wrong
conclusions...

But if I could lighten my own load and give users an easy to use interface,
I would be extremely happy!

Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect. Mark Twain


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Processing time

2003-11-06 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Debug.  We currently log with high and that information is not present in 
the logs.  However, it is with DEBUG. 

Darrell 

John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: 

At what log level does Declude record the total processing time? 

Or how can I otherwise find out the processing time per message? 

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You 

 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Scot Desort
No. This code runs on a separate server. But it must have access to the
/imail/declude folder on the target server via network shares, etc. It needs
to write the declude junkmail files to disk.

--
Scot

- Original Message - 
From: ISPhuset Nordic / Benny Samuelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


 Do you hav e to run it on the same server as the mail server is running ?


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Desort
 Sent: 6. november 2003 22:44
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thanks Keith.

 A bunch of folks have asked about the code. I have no problem sharing it.
I want to clean it up a bit, add comments, and put
 together a db schema for reference, then I will post a URL for download to
the list. Scott can then place a link on his add-on page
 if he wants.

 I am not a professional CF programmer, so some of the code will be a
little rough. But it's such a small piece of code, there's
 probably only a few things that could be done to tune it up.

 --
 Scot

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell
  Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:12 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface
 
 
  That's very well done. We use ColdFusion here, would you be willing to
  send a copy of your code? Or is this more of a $ item?
 
  Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas
  City)
  Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments,
  is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
  confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
  disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
  recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
  copies of the original message.
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scot Desort
   Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:28 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface
  
  
   I just finished throwing together a web interface to allow
   our customers to
   self-maintain their spam thresholds, whitelists and declude
   actions. It's
   very simple, but does everything we need. Written in ColdFusion, SQL
   database to store settings, with a custom tag that writes the
   text files to
   disk for Declude to read. The only thing that would be nice
   would be to have
   it sync the password with the IMAIL password. I suppose one
   of these days I
   will convert all of my domains to SQL for IMAIL password
   storage, which
   would solve the problem.
  
   Your comments are welcomed:
  
   http://spamwatch.njaccess.com
  
   demo login
   user name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   pw: spam
  
   Feel free to play around. It's not a live account.
  
   Thanks,
  
  
   --
   Scot
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:30 PM
   Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList option questions
  
  
   
Just upgrading Declude after a fair amount of time.  The
   docs say that
   the
white list file should go into $default$.junkmail.  Just
  wanted to
   confirm
it goes there and not global.cfg.
   
That is correct.  The WHITELISTFILE option is designed for
   incoming mail
only, and only applies to the
  \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail and
per-user/per-domain files.
   
-Scott
---
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the
  Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type 

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Scot Desort
Jason-

I will be posting a link to download the code once I clean it up and
document it. The code is very rough, but it's small and runs fast because
there really isn't much processing going on. You'll be able to tweak it to
suit your needs.

--
Scot


- Original Message - 
From: Jason Newland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


 Would you be interested in sharing this. It looks great!

 Thanks!

 Jason


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Grotjan
 Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:02 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


 Scot,
 The web interface looks good.  I created something similar using ASP and
 a custom COM object I wrote.  I uses Imail rules instead of the
 individual junkmail files to process the mail based on weight test.  I
 implemented it about a month ago and so far we have over a thousand
 users using it and all of them are thrilled about it.  I don't have a
 demo set up, but I have a screenshot of it if you want to see.
 http://www.kimbanet.com/junkmail.jpg

 Daniel
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
 http://www.mail-archive.com.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface

2003-11-06 Thread Scot Desort
Very nice Daniel. I had not thought about doing it that way. I could
certainly have CF modify the rules.ima file instead of the junkmail file.
But you lose the ability to offer a SUBJECT action, and a lot of my users
seem to like that.

I like the idea of integrating it into the imail web interface. But I have
so many users who have never used the imail web product because, quite
frankly, it's one of the worst webmail interfaces out there as far as
stability and user friendliness goes (and I tend to agree with my users). I
have thought about implementing SquirrelMail on a separate box for a long
time now, after getting so frustrated with Imail Webmail. But losing the
tight integration with imail has always stopped me (not being able to change
passwords, set vacation processing, etc).

How are you handling the auto-deletion of expired messages in the junkmail
folder?

--
Scot





- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Grotjan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Opinions on web interface


 Scot,
 The web interface looks good.  I created something similar using ASP and a
custom COM object I wrote.  I uses Imail rules instead of the individual
junkmail files to process the mail based on weight test.  I implemented it
about a month ago and so far we have over a thousand users using it and all
of them are thrilled about it.  I don't have a demo set up, but I have a
screenshot of it if you want to see.  http://www.kimbanet.com/junkmail.jpg

 Daniel
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion? - Java?

2003-11-06 Thread Matthew Bramble




Now I understand what Postini is, the original question makes more
sense.

I just read a review of their service from PC Magazine (linked from
their site). They have a 1.4% false positive rate, and a 15.1% false
negative rate.

For a comparison, our first gateway customer (fairly small client) in
the last three days has seen a 0.12% false positive rate, and a 0.61%
false negative rate. The only FP was an ad from JCrew and was the
result of just having installed Message Sniffer and needing to build up
my whitelist for them. This account averages about 13.7 spams per day
per account, though over 90% of it goes to just 15% of their users.

I'd call that a good selling point :) I must confess though, their
traffic was easy, but the majority of the false negatives will be gone
after I block two more static spammers.

Read about the results from that article for them and other companies
at this link:

 http://www.postini.com/services/Postini_PC_Mag_11_2003.pdf

Decent interface...very questionable results.

Matt



Sheldon Koehler wrote:

  
I'd gladly pay for something that worked.

  
  
I did not expect it for free. I have the KWM price in mind as a point I
could get my partners to go for. Any higher than this and it would be a very
hard sell for me. So this means a lot of people need to be interested in it!

Our local competition uses Postini. And I have lost a few customers over to
them as people do seem to like that interface. However, I have thrown out
the "security" thing to muddy the waters ;-) We do not send their email
"out" to someone else's servers... I let them draw their own wrong
conclusions...

But if I could lighten my own load and give users an easy to use interface,
I would be extremely happy!

Sheldon


Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications   360-457-9023
Nationwide access, neighborhood support!

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time
to pause and reflect." Mark Twain
  





---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain Folders for Custom $default$ file

2003-11-06 Thread Jonathan
I'm sure I'm missing something, but that doesn't seem to be working.

In my D:\Imail\Declude\$default$.junkmail, I have:
REDIRECT @domain.com  d:\Imail\Declude\templates\group1.cfg
and, in that group1.cfg file, I have copied the file that used to work in:
d:\imail\declude\domain.com.
I removed the domain.com folder, so that the REDIRECT statement would work.

Any suggestions on what I'm overlooking?



At 01:26 PM 10/31/2003, you wrote:

hmm.. I was under the impression that was per-user.  So I would stick 
these in the root $default$? :
REDIRECT domain.com  c:\blah\template-1.cfg
REDIRECT domain2.com  c:\blah\template-1.cfg
It should actually be:

REDIRECT @domain.com  c:\blah\template-1.cfg
REDIRECT @domain2.com  c:\blah\template-1.cfg
If those lines are in the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file, E-mail 
to @domain.com and @domain2.com will use the c:\blah\template-1.cfg file 
(unless there are per-domain or per-user config files, which would take 
priority -- so you should remove the existing per-domain config files).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Do you use ColdFusion?

2003-11-06 Thread Matt Robertson
Ditto here.  Solid as a rock if left in capable hands.


 Matt Robertson   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 MSB Designs, Inc.  http://mysecretbase.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.