Matt-
Isn't the Imail URL Blacklist a list of url's that appear in spam email?
You reference it in (2.) below as a sender blacklist.
Thanks for clarification,
MB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Monday, November 17,
All,
I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under
Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster
than native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under Cygwin shell) and
a customized SPAMC (SPAMD client) for Win32 plugged in to Declude.
Since I'm
Yep. I installed it on my XP Pro (SP1+) workstation, created
a zero-length declude.exe in the Imail directory, and got the
same results.
I figured that this may have been because I didn't actually
have Imail on the machine, so I repeated the process on a
Imail Express box (W2K
SP4+).
Sandy, tis 3:30 AM there. Go to sleep.
;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL
Sandy, tis 3:30 AM there. Go to sleep.
Looks like Sandy is not the only one working at this time. |-)
M.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to
Yep.
Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 2:48:36 AM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sandy, tis 3:30 AM there. Go to sleep.
MG Looks like Sandy is not the only one working at this time. |-)
MG M.
MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
MG
What would be the best way (i know best is
subjective) to block a message like the one below ?
Would adding microsoft.com to my SPAMDOMAINS file
work ??
Thank you.
Jeff
Received: from av3.stonline.sk [213.81.152.34] by
updatenyc.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.04) id A1CA33F0062; Tue, 18 Nov
I notice a lot of unknown (HELO localhost) in the second received line.
Would this ever be legit or could I filter on it?
Unfortunately, that could be legit. Some mailservers will add that if a
mail client uses HELO localhost, which is fairly common (I believe the
Pegasus mail client does
What would be the best way (i know best is subjective) to block a message
like the one below ?
Would adding microsoft.com to my SPAMDOMAINS file work ??
No, that wouldn't work -- the E-mail was sent with a return address
of mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, this one appears
Sandy,
I am definitely interested!
-Nick Hayer
All,
I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD
under Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much,
much faster than native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under
Cygwin shell) and a
Mark wrote:
Isn't the Imail URL Blacklist a list of url's that appear in spam
email?
You reference it in (2.) below as a sender blacklist.
Yes. This converts those urls to a sender blacklist. So if the domain
'buymystuff.com' is in the Imail blacklist, the program converts that to
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange Anomaly
I'm
just wondering can you have a normal anomaly???
Sorry-
I couldn't help it
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Keith
JohnsonSent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:03 PMTo:
[EMAIL
Hello,
One of our clients has been forwarding e-mails that have made it
through the cracks and found something interesting.
I have our network whitelisted, and have the secdns entry so that it
checks the ip of the originating server when it comes through the sec mail
server. But
I'm tempted to block this as I'm not sure I like this kinda info in other
people's hands.
I'm updating my address book. Would you please take a moment to review your
contact information? Your updates help to keep me current, as well as other
people like me who already have your email address.
To
i've gotten quite a few of these too... but from people i know that is...
- Original Message -
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?
I'm tempted to block this as I'm not
I use Plaxo. Wonderful little program.
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?
i've gotten
SPAMDOMAINS wouldn't work on this message because the MAILFROM is not
microsoft.com.
It appears to be a virus, in which case Declude Virus would be the best
method of blocking it. If you don't want to run that, then I also
believe that this message uses extensions like PIF and SCR, in which
Thanks.
Upon further inspection, I found that the original attachment was replaces
with a text file indicating that the original attachment had in fact been
dangerous and had been deleted which explains why Declude Virus let it
through.
I'm going to go look at your FORIEGN/TLD filter set now.
We have a domain with user-specific declude config files. I want to confirm
declude behavior on something:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- imail forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user1.junkmail file exists
user2.junkmail file exists
$default$.junkmail exists for domain1.com
If a message comes in addressed to
--
Scot
It is indeed user1. That's because the E-mail for user1 needs to be
handled, since it is an actual user account.
But I can do a redirect correct? In user1.junkmail:
REDIRECT[EMAIL PROTECTED]x:\imail\declude\domain1.com\user2.junkmail
Or, if user1.junkmail does not exist,
It is indeed user1. That's because the E-mail for user1 needs to be
handled, since it is an actual user account.
But I can do a redirect correct? In user1.junkmail:
REDIRECT[EMAIL PROTECTED]x:\imail\declude\domain1.com\user2.junkmail
Yes, that would work -- in this case, E-mail
We are an ISP and we host a lot of domains so our mail volume is healthy.
We hold at 10 and delete at 20. We also have our in-house blacklist that
automatically deletes any mail from certain domains. Of the incoming spam
messages we are deleting about 80% but that still leaves several thousand
Now, Sandy, don't go demonizing spamassassin... oh wait, daemonizing, that's
different.
Yes, me too! I am interested in the same thing; there are a lot of very
cool logical tests in spamassassin that would be great to implement in my
Windows(tm) world.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
Chuck,
I recently moved to using Attach for spam that hasn't gotten to a delete weight yet.
Sender is 'you have spam' and subject is the spam sender's address. This lets the
user skim the mail and delete from the list without individual mailpiece scanning.
Coupled to that are instructions
I would be very interested to hear how this all works out for those that
try it. Please post to the list after you break it in a little.
It would be very nice if someone could port the whole thing over to an
EXE and run it like Message Sniffer. Maybe that sounds stupid...I just
don't know :)
I notice an increase in held E-mail whenever the crud spammers are more
active. It's hard to score these guys very high when a campaign first
starts. I would try finding their URL's and black list those, but only
when attached to crud spam, and since they are short-lived, you can
delete the
It would be very nice if someone could port the whole thing over to
an EXE and run it like Message Sniffer. Maybe that sounds stupid...I
just don't know :)
Actually, that's exactly what you DON'T want to do, if you can avoid
it. SPAMD is a multi-process (forking) daemon--a
All,
I have posted for download SPAMC32, my adaptation of Freddy
Tarasevicius' WinSpamC with tweaks for IMail/Declude integration.
http://www.mailmage.com/download/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/0.5.53/spamc32-0.5.53.zip
Use at your own risk, needless to say, and note GPL/PAL inherited
I tinkered with SA on windows when I was evaluating Declude. I successfully
got all of the Perl scripts changed for windows. I could run an email
message on disk through the spamassassin batch file (which calls perl, etc),
and it would output the message score back to the batch file. However, for
Would be nice to see this all put together for inclusion as a
Declude test.
Well, that's what I've done, methinks. :)
Since you can run SPAMD anywhere, even on a separate *nix machine,
there's little reason to have that be part of any turnkey setup, but
SPAMC32 is Declude-ready,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail blacklist, phrase list converter
The next thing I'm going to try is making the blacklist
31 matches
Mail list logo
