RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail blacklist, phrase list converter

2003-11-18 Thread Mark Brody
Matt-

Isn't the Imail URL Blacklist a list of url's that appear in spam email?
You reference it in (2.) below as a sender blacklist.

Thanks for clarification,

MB

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail blacklist, phrase list converter


OK, I've completed what I suppose you could call the first version of my
Imail-to-Declude black- and phrase-list converter.  Get it here:

http://foohbar.com/declude_importer.zip

It turned into a complete ColdFusion application.  The system will 

1. Retrieve source files from ftp.ipswitch.com
2. Convert the url blacklist into a Declude sender blacklist (skipping
any entries you have placed in a separate skip list) 3. Convert the
phrase list into a Declude filter file.  Filters will be created for
matches in subject and body. 4. FTP the newly minted files to the
location you specify.

NOTES:
a. All settings are made in application.cfm, including filter weights.
b. You can use the browser interface (index.cfm) to run all tests in
sequence automatically, or individually. c. Since they can be run
individually, you can opt to schedule the files to run automatically. d.
You have to set up global.cfg and $default$.junkmail to use the new
tests and files. e. With these tests in place, all mail tests take about
250ms per email tested.  However, this is on MY server with MY
configuration.  Your mileage may vary. f. On a very fast server (dual
2ghz xeon with gobs of ram, super-duper scsi) the
download/conversion/upload process takes just under three minutes.  Most
of this is the processing of the 17,000-entry url blacklist.  On a slow
server, it takes a lot longer.

External dependencies:
1. The app uses the pkzip Command Line tool to unzip the Imail source
files.  You can alter the batch file and import01.cfm to use whatever
command line unzip program you use. 2. cf_ProgressMeter is used to
display a progress bar.  This is a $5 tool I *highly* recommend.  If you
don't own it or don't want to buy it just go in and remove the calls to
it in import02.cfm and import03.cfm.

I'm in the process of rolling out a new web site in the next couple of
days.  I'll add this and anything else useful I can think of in the
spamfighting section.  If anyone has improvements to this, please pass
'em on!

Cheers,

--
---
 Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
All,

I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under
Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster
than  native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under Cygwin shell) and
a customized SPAMC (SPAMD client) for Win32 plugged in to Declude.

Since  I'm  far  from a Cygwin expert, I leave setting that part up to
you,  but if anyone's interested in the Declude-compatible client EXE,
post back and let me know.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Updater

2003-11-18 Thread Markus Gufler

 Yep.  I installed it on my XP Pro (SP1+) workstation, created 
 a zero-length declude.exe in the Imail directory, and got the 
 same results.
 I figured that this may have been because I didn't actually 
 have Imail on the machine, so I repeated the process on a 
 Imail Express box (W2K 
 SP4+).  Same results.

If there is no declude.exe in the destination folder will it be copied from
the DU/release/175 folder?

Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Sandy, tis 3:30 AM there. Go to sleep.

;)

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
 Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:26 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working
 for me...I think!
 
 All,
 
 I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under
 Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster
 than  native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under Cygwin shell) and
 a customized SPAMC (SPAMD client) for Win32 plugged in to Declude.
 
 Since  I'm  far  from a Cygwin expert, I leave setting that part up to
 you,  but if anyone's interested in the Declude-compatible client EXE,
 post back and let me know.
 
 -Sandy
 
 
 
 Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
 Broadleaf Systems, a division of
 Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Markus Gufler

 Sandy, tis 3:30 AM there. Go to sleep.

Looks like Sandy is not the only one working at this time. |-)

M.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Don Brown
Yep.


Tuesday, November 18, 2003, 2:48:36 AM, Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sandy, tis 3:30 AM there. Go to sleep.

MG Looks like Sandy is not the only one working at this time. |-)

MG M.

MG ---
MG [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

MG ---
MG This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
MG unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
MG type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
MG at http://www.mail-archive.com.




Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55  (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Best Way to block the below message ??

2003-11-18 Thread Jeff Pereira



What would be the best way (i know best is 
subjective) to block a message like the one below ?

Would adding microsoft.com to my SPAMDOMAINS file 
work ??

Thank you.

Jeff

Received: from av3.stonline.sk [213.81.152.34] by 
updatenyc.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.04) id A1CA33F0062; Tue, 18 Nov 
2003 03:01:14 -0500Received: from smtp.stonline.sk 
([192.168.4.53])by av3.stonline.sk (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id 
hAI7wHJi029648for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Nov 
2003 08:58:17 +0100Received: from rwos (telecom-213-161-129.telecom.sk 
[213.81.161.129])by smtp1.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP 
Server)with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for [EMAIL PROTECTED];Tue, 18 
Nov 2003 08:58:17 +0100 (MET)Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:57:50 +0100 
(MET)Date-warning: Date header was inserted by smtp1.stonline.skFrom: 
Microsoft Corporation Network Security Center[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
Network Security UpdateTo: Commercial User [EMAIL PROTECTED]Message-id: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]MIME-version: 
1.0Content-type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary="Boundary_(ID_P1VN7aaL239Vja+tPXlFZw)"X-RAVMilter-Version: 
8.4.3(snapshot 20030212) (av3.stonline.sk)X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [213.81.152.34]X-Note: 
This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for 
spam.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX [0]X-Note: Total spam weight of this 
E-mail is 0.X-Country-Chain: X-Note: This E-mail was sent from 
av3.stonline.sk ([213.81.152.34]).X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: 
UX-UIDL: 349464161


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] unknown (HELO localhost)

2003-11-18 Thread R. Scott Perry

I notice a lot of unknown (HELO localhost) in the second received line. 
Would this ever be legit or could I filter on it?
Unfortunately, that could be legit.  Some mailservers will add that if a 
mail client uses HELO localhost, which is fairly common (I believe the 
Pegasus mail client does that).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Way to block the below message ??

2003-11-18 Thread R. Scott Perry

What would be the best way (i know best is subjective) to block a message 
like the one below ?

Would adding microsoft.com to my SPAMDOMAINS file work ??
No, that wouldn't work -- the E-mail was sent with a return address 
of  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

However, this one appears to be a virus --

Received: from av3.stonline.sk [213.81.152.34] by updatenyc.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.04) id A1CA33F0062; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 03:01:14 -0500
Received: from smtp.stonline.sk ([192.168.4.53])
 by av3.stonline.sk (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAI7wHJi029648
 for mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Nov 
2003 08:58:17 +0100
Received: from rwos (telecom-213-161-129.telecom.sk [213.81.161.129])
 by smtp1.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP Server)
 with SMTP id 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  for mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:58:17 +0100 (MET)
It looks like it came from a good mailserver that received it from a 
dialup client, and:

Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:57:50 +0100 (MET)
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by smtp1.stonline.sk
It was originally missing a Date: header (thank smtp1.stonline.sk for 
fixing up the E-mail to make it less likely to be blocked!).

From: Microsoft Corporation Network Security Center 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network Security Update
To: Commercial User 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and uses virus-like From:/Subject:/To: headers.

Message-id: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good old stonline.sk -- had they not altered the headers, this E-mail would 
have failed both the BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS tests.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Nick Hayer
Sandy,

I am definitely interested!

-Nick Hayer

  All,
  
  I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD
  under Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much,
  much faster than  native Win32/ActivePerl SA, even running under
  Cygwin shell) and a customized SPAMC (SPAMD client) for Win32
  plugged in to Declude.
  
  Since  I'm  far  from a Cygwin expert, I leave setting that part up
  to you,  but if anyone's interested in the Declude-compatible client
  EXE, post back and let me know.
  
  -Sandy
  
  
  
  Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
  Broadleaf Systems, a division of
  Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
  e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail blacklist, phrase list converter

2003-11-18 Thread Matt Robertson
Mark wrote:
Isn't the Imail URL Blacklist a list of url's that appear in spam
email?
You reference it in (2.) below as a sender blacklist.

Yes.  This converts those urls to a sender blacklist.  So if the domain
'buymystuff.com' is in the Imail blacklist, the program converts that to
'@buymystuff.com' and blocks mail coming from it.  Its not perfect for
obvious reasons, but so far my logs show it to be working surprisingly
well.

The phrase list is going like gangbusters as a filter file.  Many more
hits than the blacklist.

The next thing I'm going to try is making the blacklist into a filter
file, where if the domain is in the body of the message it gets dinged.
This will be essentially the same behavior as Imail, I believe.
Processing time will be the issue to watch on that one.  

I wonder, though, if I'm really losing any speed.  I was doing this in
Imail.  Now I'm not, so have I just shifted load from something I
couldn't effectively measure (Imail) to something I can (Declude)?


 Matt Robertson   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 MSB Designs, Inc.  http://mysecretbase.com


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange Anomaly

2003-11-18 Thread Marc Catuogno
Title: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange Anomaly



I'm 
just wondering can you have a normal anomaly???

Sorry- 
I couldn't help it

  -Original Message-From: Keith Johnson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Keith 
  JohnsonSent: Monday, November 17, 2003 11:03 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Strange 
  Anomaly
  Does the Declude JunkMail log file show any information 
  about theE-mail? There have been unconfirmed reports of IMail v8 
  skipping Decludeprocessing that we are investigating
  I have a few emails saved that passed through Declude 
  unscanned if they would be helpful.
  We are starting to see this every now and then. 
  I'll look in the Declude log for the id. Thanks,
  Keith
  
attachment: winmail.dat

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted

2003-11-18 Thread Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
Hello,
One of our clients has been forwarding e-mails that have made it
through the cracks and found something interesting.
I have our network whitelisted, and have the secdns entry so that it
checks the ip of the originating server when it comes through the sec mail
server.  But today, I noticed something (I don't have the original message
or headers; but printed out the message).
The IP of our secondary mail server is 67.17.218.70.  I received a
message that had its IP put in as the hostname.  So Declude saw this IP and
whitelisted.  I'll type a couple lines of the headers:

Received: from secmail.crescentdigital.com [67.17.218.70] by
mail.crescentdigital.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id ADFD3B007E; Fri, 14
Nov 2003 08:51:57 -0500
Received: from 67.17.218.70 ([211.219.196.240])
 by secmail.crescentdigital.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with SMTP id hAEEpdwo012904;

 Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:51:41 -0500
Received: from [135.4.188.96] by 67.17.218.70 SMTP id 1fYH8RwA83HJQ7; Wed,
19 Nov 2003 19:45:46 -0700
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted

I have Declude Standard (one of the latest version, but not the
latest).  Is there anyway to fix this?  The 211.219 IP is a Korean IP and
the 135.4 is Lucent (?).
Thanks.. Jeff


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?

2003-11-18 Thread Marc Catuogno
I'm tempted to block this as I'm not sure I like this kinda info in other
people's hands.

I'm updating my address book. Would you please take a moment to review your
contact information? Your updates help to keep me current, as well as other
people like me who already have your email address.

To update your contact information, please visit the following link:
https://www.cardscan.net

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?

2003-11-18 Thread Webmaster Oilfield Directory
i've gotten quite a few of these too... but from people i know that is...

- Original Message - 
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?


 I'm tempted to block this as I'm not sure I like this kinda info in other
 people's hands.

 I'm updating my address book. Would you please take a moment to review
your
 contact information? Your updates help to keep me current, as well as
other
 people like me who already have your email address.

 To update your contact information, please visit the following link:
 https://www.cardscan.net

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and

 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.






4_1_105.gif

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?

2003-11-18 Thread Craig Gittens
I use Plaxo. Wonderful little program.

Craig.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webmaster
Oilfield Directory
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?


i've gotten quite a few of these too... but from people i know that is...

- Original Message - 
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Cardscan.net Opinions?


 I'm tempted to block this as I'm not sure I like this kinda info in other
 people's hands.

 I'm updating my address book. Would you please take a moment to review
your
 contact information? Your updates help to keep me current, as well as
other
 people like me who already have your email address.

 To update your contact information, please visit the following link:
 https://www.cardscan.net

 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and

 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.








---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Way to block the below message ??

2003-11-18 Thread Matthew Bramble
SPAMDOMAINS wouldn't work on this message because the MAILFROM is not 
microsoft.com.

It appears to be a virus, in which case Declude Virus would be the best 
method of blocking it.  If you don't want to run that, then I also 
believe that this message uses extensions like PIF and SCR, in which 
case a body filter for .pif and .scr would probably pick it up (use 
the quotes accordingly).

If you are running Declude JunkMail Pro (needed for the above as well), 
then my FORIEGN/TLD filter set would have added 3 points to the message 
(depends on how you score it though).  You can get that filter set at 
http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/

There might well be other filters that would also add points to the body 
content.  I wouldn't know though because Declude Virus is blocking all 
of this stuff.

Matt



Jeff Pereira wrote:

What would be the best way (i know best is subjective) to block a 
message like the one below ?
 
Would adding microsoft.com to my SPAMDOMAINS file work ??
 
Thank you.
 
Jeff
 
Received: from av3.stonline.sk [213.81.152.34] by updatenyc.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.04) id A1CA33F0062; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 03:01:14 -0500
Received: from smtp.stonline.sk ([192.168.4.53])
 by av3.stonline.sk (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAI7wHJi029648
 for [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 
Nov 2003 08:58:17 +0100
Received: from rwos (telecom-213-161-129.telecom.sk [213.81.161.129])
 by smtp1.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP Server)
 with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:58:17 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:57:50 +0100 (MET)
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by smtp1.stonline.sk
From: Microsoft Corporation Network Security Center
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network Security Update
To: Commercial User [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary=Boundary_(ID_P1VN7aaL239Vja+tPXlFZw)
X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030212) (av3.stonline.sk)
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [213.81.152.34]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com 
http://www.declude.com) for spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX [0]
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 0.
X-Country-Chain:
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from av3.stonline.sk ([213.81.152.34]).
X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: U
X-UIDL: 349464161


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Way to block the below message ??

2003-11-18 Thread Jeff Pereira
Thanks.

Upon further inspection, I found that the original attachment was replaces
with a text file indicating that the original attachment had in fact been
dangerous and had been deleted which explains why Declude Virus let it
through.

I'm going to go look at your FORIEGN/TLD filter set now.

Thank you.

Jeff


- Original Message -
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Way to block the below message ??


 SPAMDOMAINS wouldn't work on this message because the MAILFROM is not
 microsoft.com.

 It appears to be a virus, in which case Declude Virus would be the best
 method of blocking it.  If you don't want to run that, then I also
 believe that this message uses extensions like PIF and SCR, in which
 case a body filter for .pif and .scr would probably pick it up (use
 the quotes accordingly).

 If you are running Declude JunkMail Pro (needed for the above as well),
 then my FORIEGN/TLD filter set would have added 3 points to the message
 (depends on how you score it though).  You can get that filter set at
 http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/

 There might well be other filters that would also add points to the body
 content.  I wouldn't know though because Declude Virus is blocking all
 of this stuff.

 Matt



 Jeff Pereira wrote:

  What would be the best way (i know best is subjective) to block a
  message like the one below ?
 
  Would adding microsoft.com to my SPAMDOMAINS file work ??
 
  Thank you.
 
  Jeff
 
  Received: from av3.stonline.sk [213.81.152.34] by updatenyc.com with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.04) id A1CA33F0062; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 03:01:14 -0500
  Received: from smtp.stonline.sk ([192.168.4.53])
   by av3.stonline.sk (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAI7wHJi029648
   for [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18
  Nov 2003 08:58:17 +0100
  Received: from rwos (telecom-213-161-129.telecom.sk [213.81.161.129])
   by smtp1.stonline.sk (STOnline ESMTP Server)
   with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
   Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:58:17 +0100 (MET)
  Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:57:50 +0100 (MET)
  Date-warning: Date header was inserted by smtp1.stonline.sk
  From: Microsoft Corporation Network Security Center
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Network Security Update
  To: Commercial User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  MIME-version: 1.0
  Content-type: multipart/mixed;
  boundary=Boundary_(ID_P1VN7aaL239Vja+tPXlFZw)
  X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030212) (av3.stonline.sk)
  X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[213.81.152.34]
  X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com
  http://www.declude.com) for spam.
  X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX [0]
  X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 0.
  X-Country-Chain:
  X-Note: This E-mail was sent from av3.stonline.sk ([213.81.152.34]).
  X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Status: U
  X-UIDL: 349464161



 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forwarding and Declude

2003-11-18 Thread Scot Desort
We have a domain with user-specific declude config files. I want to confirm
declude behavior on something:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- imail forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
user1.junkmail file exists
user2.junkmail file exists
$default$.junkmail exists for domain1.com

If a message comes in addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], which junkmail file is
used?

I suspect it is using user1's... which is not what the customer is
expecting.

Is it any different if user1 was an alias instead of a mailbox with
forwarding on it?


Thanks,

--
Scot

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forwarding and Declude

2003-11-18 Thread Scot Desort



--
Scot


 It is indeed user1.  That's because the E-mail for user1 needs to be
 handled, since it is an actual user account.

But I can do a redirect correct? In user1.junkmail:

REDIRECT[EMAIL PROTECTED]x:\imail\declude\domain1.com\user2.junkmail

Or, if user1.junkmail does not exist, it will bump over to
\domain1.com\$default$.junkmail, correct?

Thanks,

Scot



 Is it any different if user1 was an alias instead of a mailbox with
 forwarding on it?

 Yes.  In this case, the E-mail will be scanned according to the address
 that the alias points to.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
 Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forwarding and Declude

2003-11-18 Thread R. Scott Perry

 It is indeed user1.  That's because the E-mail for user1 needs to be
 handled, since it is an actual user account.
But I can do a redirect correct? In user1.junkmail:

REDIRECT[EMAIL PROTECTED]x:\imail\declude\domain1.com\user2.junkmail
Yes, that would work -- in this case, E-mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
will use the x:\imail\declude\domain1.com\user2.junkmail file.

Or, if user1.junkmail does not exist, it will bump over to
\domain1.com\$default$.junkmail, correct?
Correct.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] How do you handle held messages??

2003-11-18 Thread Chuck Schick
We are an ISP and we host a lot of domains so our mail volume is healthy.
We hold at 10 and delete at 20.  We also have our in-house blacklist that
automatically deletes any mail from certain domains.  Of the incoming spam
messages we are deleting about 80% but that still leaves several thousand
messages per day that are held.  Presently we go through the held messages
using spamreview - returning the false positives to the spool.  As the spam
has been going up - so have the messages in the held folder so this is
starting to become labor intensive.

I just wanted to query the list to see if I am missing something that would
streamline the process.  And yes we are tweaking to reduce the false
positives.

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Now, Sandy, don't go demonizing spamassassin... oh wait, daemonizing, that's
different.

Yes, me too!  I am interested in the same thing; there are a lot of very
cool logical tests in spamassassin that would be great to implement in my
Windows(tm) world.

Andrew 8)

-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for
me...I think!


All,

I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under
Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster
snip
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you handle held messages??

2003-11-18 Thread Matt Robertson
Chuck,

I recently moved to using Attach for spam that hasn't gotten to a delete weight yet.  
Sender is 'you have spam' and subject is the spam sender's address.  This lets the 
user skim the mail and delete from the list without individual mailpiece scanning.

Coupled to that are instructions that tell them how to move mail to folders inside of 
Outlook, Messenger etc.

I thought I'd get complaints, but only a smattering so far.  Within a couple of weeks 
I'll have time to set up an action to route to a specific mailbox, and charge a couple 
of bucks to set it up.  I'm not fond of it but I've had specific requests for that.

--
---
 Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Matthew Bramble
I would be very interested to hear how this all works out for those that 
try it.  Please post to the list after you break it in a little.

It would be very nice if someone could port the whole thing over to an 
EXE and run it like Message Sniffer.  Maybe that sounds stupid...I just 
don't know :)

Thanks,

Matt



Colbeck, Andrew wrote:

Now, Sandy, don't go demonizing spamassassin... oh wait, daemonizing, that's
different.
Yes, me too!  I am interested in the same thing; there are a lot of very
cool logical tests in spamassassin that would be great to implement in my
Windows(tm) world.
Andrew 8)

-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working for
me...I think!

All,

I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under
Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster
snip
 



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you handle held messages??

2003-11-18 Thread Matthew Bramble
I notice an increase in held E-mail whenever the crud spammers are more 
active.  It's hard to score these guys very high when a campaign first 
starts.  I would try finding their URL's and black list those, but only 
when attached to crud spam, and since they are short-lived, you can 
delete the entries after only a few months.  The problem here is that 
they tend to switch out URL's every few days with this type of spam 
(pills, patches, etc.)  This stuff comes from zombie machines and while 
it's somewhat easy to catch with generic filters, it's difficult to 
score high if they find a clean IP that hasn't been listed in SpamCop 
and others.

Another issue is that the spammers with static IP's will move around to 
different blocks and even when the spammer is listed in SBL, they will 
have plenty of addresses that aren't and can score low or even get past 
filters.  Knowing the address space of this type of spammer is useful.  
Check your held E-mail for the following blocks of IP's for instance:

   64.124.165.0/25 [64.124.165.0] - [64.124.165.127]
   64.124.165.128/26 [64.124.165.128] - [64.124.165.191]
   64.124.165.192/27 [64.124.165.192] - [64.124.165.223]
   64.125.181.0/24 [64.125.181.0] - [64.125.181.255]
   208.184.54.0/25 [208.184.54.0] - [208.184.54.127]
   208.184.58.0/25 [208.184.58.0] - [208.184.58.127]
   209.249.21.128/25 [209.249.21.128] - [209.249.21.255]
   209.249.55.128/25 [209.249.55.128] - [209.249.55.255]
   216.200.60.16/28 [216.200.60.16] - [216.200.60.31]
   216.200.60.32/27 [216.200.60.32] - [216.200.60.63]
   216.200.60.64/26 [216.200.60.64] - [216.200.60.127]
This is all one guy, and it's probably only half of his IP space if 
that.  It would be nice if someday we could come up with a trusted 
system to gather this information and share it among admins, but limit 
it to only clear and obvious static IP addresses that are used by spam 
gangs (the SBL type).

In the meantime, you might be able to greatly lessen your workload by 
targeting this stuff with specific filters.  The stuff above is quite 
safe to delete, at least for the time being.

Matt





Chuck Schick wrote:

We are an ISP and we host a lot of domains so our mail volume is healthy.
We hold at 10 and delete at 20.  We also have our in-house blacklist that
automatically deletes any mail from certain domains.  Of the incoming spam
messages we are deleting about 80% but that still leaves several thousand
messages per day that are held.  Presently we go through the held messages
using spamreview - returning the false positives to the spool.  As the spam
has been going up - so have the messages in the held folder so this is
starting to become labor intensive.
I just wanted to query the list to see if I am missing something that would
streamline the process.  And yes we are tweaking to reduce the false
positives.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
 



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 It  would be very nice if someone could port the whole thing over to
 an EXE and run it like Message Sniffer. Maybe that sounds stupid...I
 just don't know :)

Actually,  that's  exactly what you DON'T want to do, if you can avoid
it.   SPAMD  is  a  multi-process  (forking)  daemon--a  traditionally
accepted  architecture  on *nix, while Win32 types usually lean toward
multithreading,  with  IMail  an  interesting  hybrid--which  benefits
strongly  from  the  preloading  of  the  Perl and SA modules. Loading
everything   from   scratch   for   every  message,  though  it  works
surprisingly   well  for  Declude  and  many  of  its  plug-ins,  adds
considerable   overhead   relative   to   an   ideal   client/server
architecture.  SPAMC  and  SPAMD  are  definitely  headed in the right
design direction; the only thing better would be a native Win32 SPAMD,
which would get rid of the Cygwin layer.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMD client for IMail/Declude) available for download

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
All,

I   have   posted  for  download  SPAMC32,  my  adaptation  of  Freddy
Tarasevicius' WinSpamC with tweaks for IMail/Declude integration.

http://www.mailmage.com/download/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/0.5.53/spamc32-0.5.53.zip

Use at your own risk, needless to say, and note GPL/PAL inherited from
original  code. If you have suggestions for SPAMC32, let me know and I
can  merge  them in and post new releases. At some point this will all
go  back  to SourceForge, but let's pound on it a little first. And if
anybody (Scott?) thinks this needs its own list, that can be done.

Check  out  SPAMC32  -?  for all the help you need to get this working
with  Declude,  which  is  easy. The hard part for most of you will be
setting up SPAMD; CYGWIN.TXT has some good pointers.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Scot Desort
I tinkered with SA on windows when I was evaluating Declude. I successfully
got all of the Perl scripts changed for windows. I could run an email
message on disk through the spamassassin batch file (which calls perl, etc),
and it would output the message score back to the batch file. However, for
the life of me, I could not get the return code back into declude. Something
weird with the way the batch file was returning the result code. I gave up
on it. Didn't even think of the cygwin angle...

Would be nice to see this all put together for inclusion as a Declude test.

--
Scot


- Original Message - 
From: Matthew Bramble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki
ng for me...I think!


 I would be very interested to hear how this all works out for those that
 try it.  Please post to the list after you break it in a little.

 It would be very nice if someone could port the whole thing over to an
 EXE and run it like Message Sniffer.  Maybe that sounds stupid...I just
 don't know :)

 Thanks,

 Matt



 Colbeck, Andrew wrote:

 Now, Sandy, don't go demonizing spamassassin... oh wait, daemonizing,
that's
 different.
 
 Yes, me too!  I am interested in the same thing; there are a lot of very
 cool logical tests in spamassassin that would be great to implement in my
 Windows(tm) world.
 
 Andrew 8)
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:26 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude working
for
 me...I think!
 
 
 All,
 
 I believe I've gotten one of our sites up and running with SPAMD under
 Cygwin (server implementation of SpamAssassin that's much, much faster
 snip
 
 


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamAssassin SPAMC/SPAMD and Declude worki ng for me...I think!

2003-11-18 Thread Sanford Whiteman
 Would  be  nice  to  see  this  all  put together for inclusion as a
 Declude test.

Well, that's what I've done, methinks. :)

Since  you  can  run  SPAMD anywhere, even on a separate *nix machine,
there's  little  reason to have that be part of any turnkey setup, but
SPAMC32 is Declude-ready, exit code and all.

-Sandy



Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail blacklist, phrase list converter

2003-11-18 Thread Mark Brody
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail blacklist, phrase list converter

The next thing I'm going to try is making the blacklist into a filter
file, where if the domain is in the body of the message it gets dinged.
This will be essentially the same behavior as Imail, I believe.
Processing time will be the issue to watch on that one. 

I tried this. It was VERY detrimental to the processing speed of emails.
Was averaging 10-15 seconds PER email. Let me know if you get the same
results. This is a P4 XEON with 1G Memory too.

:) Mark


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.