[Declude.JunkMail] Atriks - Pt.2

2004-01-05 Thread Fritz Squib
Amazing, I knew that I saw a lot more spam coming from individual cable/dsl modems, but I had no idea... http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL12495 http://groups.google.com/groups?scoring=d&q=atriks.com+group:*abuse* Fritz Frederick P. Squib, Jr. Network Operations/Mail Administrator

[Declude.JunkMail] Atriks Professional Email Deployment Service - Revisited

2004-01-05 Thread Fritz Squib
Has anyone else noticed large volumes of mail coming from domains registered to this company again? Looks like they've removed the "Atriks Professional Email Deployment Service" kick-me sticker from the mail headers. I've captured/added about 45 domains so far, but they just keep coming up with m

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] attachments

2004-01-05 Thread Matthew Bramble
Check out my GIBBERISH filter for a bunch of counterbalances that are used to detect base64 and UNICODE attachments or other things that use base64 encoding, and disable the filter when found. Alternatively, when you have short words, follow them by a space. Base64 encoding doesn't utilize spa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] attachments

2004-01-05 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Dan, One problem I have is that when Declude Junkmail processes a message that has attachments it process the attachment how it was encoded typically base 64 (of couse assuming it is under the limit of what declude scans). When you have a filter with a small word like "c u m" or "s e x" it te

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] attachments

2004-01-05 Thread Dan Geiser
Scan attachments? Since when does Declude JunkMail scan attachments? Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Gene Head " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 1:34 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] attachments > Is there any way to not scan

[Declude.JunkMail] attachments

2004-01-05 Thread Gene Head
Is there any way to not scan attachments? Most of my false positives are all emails with spreadsheets, word docs... as attachments. Thanks Gene --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To un

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Not Processed by Declude

2004-01-05 Thread Matthew Bramble
Burzin, My experience is that this happens while the services are shutting down and not while they are coming back up. I don't think there is anything that you can do except to contact IMail. I'm using IMail 7.15r3, but this also apparently (hearsay) happens with IMail 8.05 still, though the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP4 Tests

2004-01-05 Thread Matthew Bramble
I fail on a weight of 10, only score the last hop, and use the following (see notes below, config updated yesterday for new weights and tests): BONDEDSENDERip4rquery.bondedsender.org 127.0.0.10-50 AHBL-RELAYSip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org127.0.0.2

[Declude.JunkMail] Message Not Processed by Declude

2004-01-05 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Hi, I received an email that appears not to have been scanned by Declude. I checked the DecMMDD.log and the SysMMDD.txt logs. I think this happened because of a scheduled reboot of the server. Short of not rebooting the server, should I stop SMTP and Queue Manager prior to reboot in order to p

[Declude.JunkMail] IP4 Tests

2004-01-05 Thread Greg Foulks
I see that the Global config file on Decludes website has an updated list of IP4 tests and that the IP4 website also has a long list of IP4 tests. My question... what are some of your IP4 tests that you use that you find to be very effective? Thanks, Greg --- [This E-mail was scanned for virus

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any reason NOT to use Imail's "Verify Mail From Address" Mail From Address"

2004-01-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
However, I was wondering if there was any reason not to implement in Imail the "Verify Mail From Address" ... if I understand this correctly, any email received will cause Imail to generate a live SMTP connection to verify that the sending address is legitimate. There are benefits and drawbacks to