Hi!
A couple of days ago I found out that I no longer received mails form Declude lists:
Virus, JunkMail and Release.
When I tried to re-subscribe to the lists with Outlook 2003, I got treated as SPAM and
got the following error in the headers:
---
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of
just
testing
Would you say that this test is still a valid test? Is it
still worth
-5 when the e-mail does not fail it? If both SPAM and HAM are
almost never tripping it perhaps it is a moot point anyway as
all mail will have the -5 added to it.
-5 of what? The standard hold weight of 20 points?
In
I asked IMail tech support about this. Their response:
IMail would not be vulnerable to this type of attack. Multiple recipient
failures for the same message are included in a single bounce message. And,
the original message is truncated in the bounce.
-Dave Doherty
- Original Message
One of them will however need the %RemoteRecep% variable already available
in delude virus
Actually, there isn't such a variable in Declude Virus. :)
Is is also available or can it be easily imported to junkmail ? (And while
you are at it, %nbremoterecp% would also be very usufull)
There is a
A couple of days ago I found out that I no longer received mails form
Declude lists: Virus, JunkMail and Release.
When I tried to re-subscribe to the lists with Outlook 2003, I got treated
as SPAM and got the following error in the headers:
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of [EMAIL
Thankfully declude is catching almost all of this, but I have my personal
filter set to add a subject and not DELETE. I'm getting 50-60 messages a
day for prescripts online - all from subscriber networks (most often
charter) and it just started about 3 or 4 days ago. I haven't run stats on
the
Attached you can find a message I've received today. I think it would be a
good tecnique to add this domain to our SPAMDOMAINS list.
According to the MX nslookup information of citibank.com :
citibank.comMX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mail2.citigroup.com
citibank.comMX preference
Hello, All,
In addition to thestandard country names
which show up in the X-Country-Chain: header I also see entries like "[Arin
Unlisted]". I can use the country codes to check against the specific
country names, e.g.
COUNTRIES5CONTAINSkr
but is there any way to add points for any of the
In addition to the standard country names which show up in the
X-Country-Chain: header I also see entries like [Arin Unlisted]. I can
use the country codes to check against the specific country names, e.g.
COUNTRIES 5 CONTAINS kr
but is there any way to add points for any of the other
Now that 1.79 beta has been released are we supposed to download any
updates to all_list.dat from
http://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dathttp://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dat
This is the correct location.
Is the current version in the path always the place to get the new
Hello, All,
Now that 1.79 beta has been released are we
supposed to download any updates to all_list.dat from
http://www.declude.com/release/178/all_list.dat
or
http://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dat
?
Is the current versionin the pathalways
the place to get the new version of
Actually, there isn't such a variable in Declude Virus. :)
OOps, you are correct, there is %LocalRecps% but i guess if you can compute
one, the other is as simple :)
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 11:36 AM
Scott,
Thanks for your quick response as always.
In the below I think the URL you meant was
http://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dat.
Thanks, Much!
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April
In the below I think the URL you meant was
http://www.declude.com/release/179/all_list.dat.
You are correct. :)
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus
properly, and doesn't seem to be as widely used was originally expected.
Wow! I find the countries test to be extremely effective, not to good for
ISP folks but for any company that does localized business this test rocks.
I assign half my hold weight for any mail outside the US with a few
on 4/9/04 1:32 PM, Rick Davidson wrote:
Is it possible to make it so that if a whitelisted TO address is included
with many recipients that only that one particular address is whitelisted
and not everyone in the To field?
Whitelist To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
recieve an email to [EMAIL
sweet!
that will work perfectly
thanks man!
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist To
I know that this question is going to have a lot of it depends answers
but here it goes...
What are the Default Hold and Delete Weights that people use?
It will obviously be based on the tests that you employ and how much
weight you assign to them. In reading the JunkMail manual I got the
19 matches
Mail list logo
