[Declude.JunkMail] DNSSTUFF.COM Web Site Down?
It's 4:30A PST, and I cannot access the 'dnsstuff.com' web site. Is anyone else having the same problem? -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSSTUFF.COM Web Site Down?
On Friday, January 28, 2005, 7:32:39 AM, Kim wrote: KP It's 4:30A PST, and I cannot access the 'dnsstuff.com' web KP site. Is anyone else having the same problem? Works fine from here. _M --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSSTUFF.COM Web Site Down?
It's 4:30A PST, and I cannot access the 'dnsstuff.com' web site. Is anyone else having the same problem? The site was being reset -- normally it's only down for a few seconds, but this morning it was down for about 10 minutes. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. This outgoing message is guaranteed to be authentic by Message Level users. Guarantee the authenticity of your email @ http://www.messagelevel.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSSTUFF.COM Web Site Down?
The site was being reset -- normally it's only down for a few seconds, but this morning it was down for about 10 minutes. -Scott Thanks, Scott and Pete. I gave up after about 10 mintues of 'page cannot be found' messages. Go figure. It's working fine now. -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDEDSENDER and SNIFFER
I seem to get a fair number of messages that 'fail' both BONDEDSENDER and SNIFFER: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BONDEDSENDER [-10], SNIFFER [20], WEIGHT10 [10], TLD-TRUSTED-HELO [0], TLD-TRUSTED-MAILFROM [0], TLD-TRUSTED-REVDNS [0] TOTAL [10] Both tests are supposed to be highly trusted/accurate, so how do you resolve such diametrically opposed weightings? Who wins? -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDEDSENDER and SNIFFER
BondedSender has created a bit of a habit of protecting places that have spam problems or are even what many of us would consider to be spammers. While Pete tends to think that I am too liberal in my definition of good E-mail, the folks at BondedSender (IronPort) believe that I am way too conservative. I have reported things to them on multiple occasions and they have mostly kept the customers bonded, however they have made some tweaks. For instance, they kept Virtumundo(dot)com on, but only if they agreed to only send HotMail accounts E-mail from their bonded address. BigHip(dot)com, another clear spammer that befuddles me as to how they ever got bonded. I believe they removed them. SmartBlast(dot)net they refused to remove because I wouldn't ask my customer if they had subscribed to their list. They were getting multiple E-mails every day with subjects like Nike Blowout - Everything 60% Off from Exclusive Brand, Awareness Bracelets by Avaline and You can only get them here! New USB Pen and Wireless Mouse. SmartBlast was sending through SubscriberMail(dot)com. They have also bonded places like IceBase(dot)net which is one of the many bulk-mail providers that cater to small businesses, and often have issues with spam. From this and other similar companies, the rate of spam is about 25% to 50%. They can't police their users proactively, so I don't know why in the world you would want to bond them. They have bonded Topica in the past. If you know anything about Topica, they also operate their own spam house operation, and they provide bulk-mailing services to spammers. They have even been blacklisted by SBL. I have even found a goth-teen-pseudo-porn site listed, suicidegirls(dot)com. While they don't spam, what was happening was they were offering incentives to their members to bring in more customers, and as a result one of their members had spammed from a different server, but blacklists will often target the payload network and not just the spammer, so I suppose they had issues with being blacklisted. http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchBy=ipaddresssearchString=209.237.248.37 I could go on and on, but the bottom line with BondedSender is that the people that seek out protection are doing so primarily because they have problems. Most places with problems being blacklisted suffer from the fact that spam (according to almost all definitions) comes from their networks. I don't use BondedSender, and I have suggested in the past that Declude rethink their choice of including BondedSender in their default setup. IronPort is a peculiar company building bulk-mail servers that are sometimes used by spam operations, but they also sell anti-spam appliances. They own SpamCop, SenderBase, and of course BondedSender. I absolutely love SenderBase and greatly appreciate having that tool, and SpamCop is certainly a top 10 resource on my system, but I really take issue with BondedSender and if anything, things have gotten worse with time rather than better. Matt Kim Premuda wrote: I seem to get a fair number of messages that 'fail' both BONDEDSENDER and SNIFFER: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BONDEDSENDER [-10], SNIFFER [20], WEIGHT10 [10], TLD-TRUSTED-HELO [0], TLD-TRUSTED-MAILFROM [0], TLD-TRUSTED-REVDNS [0] TOTAL [10] Both tests are supposed to be highly trusted/accurate, so how do you resolve such diametrically opposed weightings? Who wins? -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ = --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDEDSENDER and SNIFFER
You decide, Kim. If you decide that Message Sniffer is wrong, and you are a licenced user, then report it to SortMonster as per their false positive reporting procedure. Perhaps a particular bulk mailer is using a web bug or some other small bit of text that is the same as a spammer's. http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/FalsePositivesHelp.html If you decide that Bonded Sender is allowing a spammer, report it to them for their action. http://www.bondedsender.com/reportabuse.jsp A third possibility is that you are using the Bonded Sender test wrong. If you're not sure about that, post your configuration here for others to double-check with you. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Premuda Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 10:10 AM To: Declude JunkMail Forum Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDEDSENDER and SNIFFER I seem to get a fair number of messages that 'fail' both BONDEDSENDER and SNIFFER: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BONDEDSENDER [-10], SNIFFER [20], WEIGHT10 [10], TLD-TRUSTED-HELO [0], TLD-TRUSTED-MAILFROM [0], TLD-TRUSTED-REVDNS [0] TOTAL [10] Both tests are supposed to be highly trusted/accurate, so how do you resolve such diametrically opposed weightings? Who wins? -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDEDSENDER and SNIFFER
They seem to have taken on a couple of bad entities lately here too. I've noticed some scoring oddities. For me beliefnet . com, coolsavings . com, ediets . com and YOURNEWSLETTERS . NET are the questionable or undesired entities that are listed on bonded sender. Usually a quick add to a fromfile or an ipfile, skews the weighting were I'd like them to be. I'd also recommend adding a DYNA to the BONDEDSENDER test name, so it only checks the last hop. - Original Message - From: Kim Premuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude JunkMail Forum Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:09 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDEDSENDER and SNIFFER I seem to get a fair number of messages that 'fail' both BONDEDSENDER and SNIFFER: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: BONDEDSENDER [-10], SNIFFER [20], WEIGHT10 [10], TLD-TRUSTED-HELO [0], TLD-TRUSTED-MAILFROM [0], TLD-TRUSTED-REVDNS [0] TOTAL [10] Both tests are supposed to be highly trusted/accurate, so how do you resolve such diametrically opposed weightings? Who wins? -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
