Scott. Any response to this.
There should be a new release Monday that covers the issues from this week.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection
Scott. Any response to this.
Fred
It shows this way in Spam Review and the Subject Line test also catches
this.
It was fixed in the 2.03b but after I installed the production 2.0 released
by Barry it is now broken again.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
There are a bunch in this list I think...
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Referrals.html
_M
On Friday, February 4, 2005, 6:27:07 PM, Danny wrote:
D> Looking for a email provider that includes email services,
D> spam, virus detection, all in one package that has an excellent up
D> tim
On Friday, February 4, 2005, 7:06:04 PM, Matt wrote:
M> John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
>>Yeah, but a little birdie told me that the president can get a little hot
>>some times.
>>
>>
M> Where's that birdie located? I'll shoot it if it has been saying bad
M> things about me :)
You have to kee
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Yeah, but a little birdie told me that the president can get a little hot
some times.
Where's that birdie located? I'll shoot it if it has been saying bad
things about me :)
Matt
--
=
MailPure custom filters fo
Really you want to pick someone who doesn't waste all their time posting to
some geeky listserv. I
:-D
(just kidding. But Danny, why don't you tell us how many mailboxes/domains
you need. I'm sure you'll get some private responses)
At 06:20 PM 2/4/2005, you wrote:
Yeah, but a little birdie t
To be professionally honest, that kind
of information would be provided as part of a proposal process, informal or
formal.
Being that you are representing an ISP,
cost information would require an open channel of communication and
information, one that would be done off a public list.
When I go to http://www.mailpure.com/ I don't see any information on
services.
Matt wrote:
Try MailPure. I hear that they are the absolute best, and their
president is a wonderful person :)
Seriously though...what did you expect?
Matt
Danny wrote:
Can anyone recommend any email outsourcing co
Looking for a email provider that includes email services, spam, virus
detection, all in one package that has an excellent up time, and
excellent data recovery network and excellent tech support. I need to
know the cost per mailbox but with which allows multiple domains.
John Tolmachoff (List
Yeah, but a little birdie told me that the president can get a little hot
some times.
;)
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Friday, February 04
I have that test disabled for the duration.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update
I'd upgrade to 1.82 if you use the spamheaders test. It's broken in 1.81.
I
Try MailPure. I hear that they are the absolute best, and their
president is a wonderful person :)
Seriously though...what did you expect?
Matt
Danny wrote:
Can anyone recommend any email outsourcing companies other then
everyone.net?
TIA
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Vi
Well, being that some of us on this list provide e-mail services to clients,
what exactly do you mean?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny
> Sent: Frida
I'd upgrade to 1.82 if you use the spamheaders test. It's broken in 1.81.
It's the only change between 1.81 and 1.82.
- Original Message -
From: "Glenn \ WCNet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update
>
I credit some weight back for emails over 200 KB.
Spam 200 KB or over is very rare... in my case it tends to be a couple of
spams a month in Chinese.
Spam over 50 KB are rare, I had about 112 last month.
I also skip body filters on these larger emails (200 KB or higher)
- Original Message ---
Can anyone recommend any email outsourcing companies other then
everyone.net?
TIA
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "u
Thank you for the update.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Krausse
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subj
I'm still running 1.81 and don't plan on changing that until all this ruckus
gets settled down. :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Ralph Krausse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:11 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update
We have been develop
I am going to look into the combo filter thing. I think Scott Fisher has
a link the the SIZE program on his Declude Helper Site.
Thanx
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Yeah not a good idea from that point of view
Goran Jovanovic
The LAN Shoppe
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:36 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail
We have been developing fixes designed to address the issues reported in the
last few days and comprehensive testing will continue through the weekend.
The results will be reviewed and further information will be released on
Monday.
Thanks for your patience.
Declude Engineering
---
[This E-mai
Well, let's put it this way. I don't bypass based on that a generic
text string that is so small.
A small negative weight though... that may be useful to you. Size will
be more useful, and a combo test of size and your bypass.txt file, that
will definitely be useful.
If you want to be a little
> Would it be "smart" to add the following to my BYPASS filter?
>
> BODY 0 CONTAINS .pdf"
Then every spammer will just start inserting that some one and then...
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.dec
Andrew,
Thanx.
Would it be "smart" to add the following to my BYPASS filter?
BODY 0 CONTAINS .pdf"
I will look for your previous post and see if I can add something to my
BYPASS filter. I was thinking about the SIZE external test a while ago
but never got around to it. Maybe this is the push th
Well, Goran, "why" is a big question.
The answer is essentially that the MIME format does not require any
particular adherence to the encoding for any particular file type. The
application/octet-stream format you're seeing is very very common for
"binary" attachments (i.e. not plain text).
The r
Hi all,
I have a BYPASS.TXT filter with checks for a bunch of different
attachments on an e-mail. In particular:
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/pdf
Now I have an e-mail that had a PDF with it but for the headers it had:
--_=_NextPart_002_01C50ABC.84EA3C80
Content-Type: applicatio
26 matches
Mail list logo
