[Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Scott Fisher
A question for Declude... Has Declude been tested with Imail 8.20?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
Scott, No, Declude has not yet been tested with Imail 8.2, although we expect to begin some testing very shortly. We have been in the process of resolving some outstanding issues and preparing to do an interim release. It would have been counter-productive to introduce a new IMail platform

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Dan Horne
I upgraded yesterday to Imail 8.2 and so far the phones aren't ringing off the hooks. No reported problems from any of our users. I've tailed the logs and they all seem normal. I am running Declude Junkmail Pro/Virus Standard/Hijack 2.0.6. Dan Horne From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Jeff Frantz
I upgraded to v8.2 this morning and have had no issues. Im running Declude Virus and Junkmail v2.0.6. -Jeff From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:07 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Andy Schmidt
Wow ... this is the FIRST time in very many years that I actually am pleased what they added. Does anyone know if the "SPF connection filtering" truly is DURING the SMTP conversation? If so, will it by bypassed if SMTP AUTH is used?That alone would receive my message load by about 5%.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread William Stillwell
I just upgraded.. NOT WORKING.. I am getting AUTH errors on sending to local users, and 550 Errors.. - Original Message - From: Jeff Frantz To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:37 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, There is a knowledge base entry about a new ODBC DLL. If you keep your user base in SQL, make sure that you get the latest DLL. Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax: +1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
These types of errors are not related to Declude. Authentication is handled directly with IMail during the SMTP dialogue. This issue has already surfaced in the IMail forum. David Franco-Rocha - Original Message - From: William Stillwell To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Scott Fisher
A quick, information filled response. Thanks! - Original Message - From: David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20 Scott, No, Declude has not

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20 ** BUG **

2005-04-28 Thread William Stillwell
Hey, If your using an External Database MAKE sure you fix it. http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20050427-DM03.htm - Original Message - From: Jeff Frantz To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:37 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread William Stillwell
I wasn't reffering to declude not working, There is an issue with the odbc with an external database, I was just informing people there is a "Slight" issue with it. I have posted the resolution for those that are not aware. Other than that, declude appears to be working fine here.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
There is really no problem posting this to the JunkMail list. But, since it is specifically an IMail problem, make sure it is at least cross-posted to the IMail list also. David Franco-Rocha - Original Message - From: William Stillwell To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message I agree, Andy, those features caught my eye too. But so did: eAladdin now used for licensing. I really want the multithreaded SMTPD, but I'll be waiting a good while before trying this version. The block connections after x bad recipients may be enough incentive for me

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
Just out of curiosity, what's the issue with eAladdin? Can it cause problems, or is it just excessive in one way or another? Thanks, Matt Colbeck, Andrew wrote: Message I agree, Andy, those features caught my eye too. But so did: eAladdin now used for licensing.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Title: Message I'm always interested in the details of protection mechanisms. Not because I'm a pirate, but becausethose mechansimscan be anunnecessary interference that can be very painful to work through. And there is no information in Ipswitch's kb, forums, or general Googling for what

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread William Stillwell
When I insalled 8.2 All it required was a License # no dongle or anything. I beleive it did a phone hope type deal like declude. There are several methods to software Licensing It is cheaper to actually purchase a third party license system, then to develope your own. - Original Message -

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks for pointing that out, Nick. It's the lack of Ipswitch documentation and discussion regarding the implementation of Aladdin's technology that bugs me. Aladdin themselves are a well-known and well-respected company. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
I guess one of the big questions that I would have would be what would happen if I installed on a new server and then imported my registry settings over to it. Where's the unlocked identifier stuff stored? I'm sure there are many other things as well to be concerned about such as what came

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I was on the phone yesterday with WebTrends where they told me that my copy of their software wasn't legitimate because I wasn't the original owner and they don't transfer licenses... FTR and way OT, just got finished with my second extended flame mail to NetIQ (WebTrends' former

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Steve Oren
Sandy, Only the arrogant fools at NetIQ could screw up something like Webtrends which was once the best stats tool available. And unless they have changed something recently (which would come as no surprise) they used to transfer licenses no problem. We acquired a company a couple of years

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Fwiw, it's the management of WT that's buying it out/back. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be

[Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Ok -- time for the question again. Thumbs up or down on the declude / smartermail integration? Comments appreciated. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Mailing Lists
Moved 3 installs from Imail to SM/DECLUDE. Wish I would have done it sooner. - Original Message - From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:22 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail Ok -- time for the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
doubts about the legality of some such provisions in boxed EULA's. I was on the phone yesterday with WebTrends where they told me that my copy of their software wasn't legitimate because I wasn't the original owner and they don't transfer licenses...this is the same company that moved from

[Declude.JunkMail] CMDSPACE failure

2005-04-28 Thread Katie LaSalle-Lowery
Can anyone point me at a resource for determining why a message fails CMDSPACE? Thanks, Katie --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CMDSPACE failure

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If their is a space in one of the commands where there should not be per the RFC's during the smtp transaction it will cause this test to be failed. One thing to note Outlook fails this test every time so you should compensate for this. Darrell ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Michael Jaworski
The price for SM from Declude was great. Even better yet is SmarterMail, the product. It works. Their able to get things tuned up or added a lot quicker like Declude. I am seeing a pattern. I like it when a software company is lean and mean. I would rather feed a lean cat than a fat cat. First

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Shayne Embry
Overall we're happy with the combo. Hosting 81 domains/350 users and getting ready to add another 100 or so accounts. We very much prefer SM to Imail. Web interface alone is worth the switch, and we've been able to do some nifty things incorporating automation and other .Net driven features into

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Matt Robertson
My Imail license is relegated to SMTP traffic generated by a ColdFusion server. SmarterMail took over the public-facing mail chores shortly after Ipswitch killed Imail in favor of ICS. Second the comment about the web interface. Its as if grownups designed it versus hobbyists. Sounds harsh but

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Does Smartermail have any features built in for gateway based systems - i.e. load a list of accounts that are valid that you gateway for envelope rejection? Darrell --- Comprehensive reporting for Declude Junkmail and Virus - DLAnalyzer -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread IMail Admin
So how about all the hot new features of IMail 8.2? How do those compare with similar features in SmarterMail? Also, we mostly use IMAP, rather than the web interface. How does the IMAP feature in Smartermail compare to Imail? For that matter, is there any change to the IMAP feature in Imail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Best to download a free copy of SmarterMail to evaluate for yourself. But except for the advanced spam SmarterMail already had these new features. Alternate port, On spartermail you can use a different alternate port per domain. Automatic droping of connections in a dictionary attack situation.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20 / Webtrends

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
OT -- What are you moving your webtrends install to?? Do you use multiple servers? Thanks, Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Why didn't you point your CF server at smartermail? And, if I'm trying to reduce the new systems and learning curves, can I keep Declude Virus and Junkmail going? Thanks for the input. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Shayne Embry
We're doing just that. Using SmartMail's web services we can generate a list of all accounts and aliases on the system. We then just script that list over toour Postfix on a set schedule.ShayneDoes Smartermail have any features built in for gateway based systems - i.e.load a list of accounts that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20 / Webtrends

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Yes, multiple servers (10+) for this site. We are still in the process of evaluation of a few of the major vendors now (Omniture, Web Side Story, etc). Darrell --- invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering plug-in for Declude. Block 85% of SPAM with the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Doherty
Not the last time I asked for it. They acted like they could not fathom why we would ever need it, and said they weren't even working on it. So I'm still on Imail. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
hmm .. .I think I'm confused. You're saying Imail has a way to load user accounts for gateway systems? All I've ever seen is the host file hack for adding gateway domains, but I've never seen a way to load user accounts. Am I missing something? No it does not have this feature built in but

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Doherty
My comment refers to their SmartHost feature, which allegedly is a gateway product. But there is no way for the mailbox server to communicate to the SmartHost what addresses are acceptable. Therefore, you need to script some stuff up and use a different gateway. That makes the SmartHost

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dave, That's unfortunate - that feature would be a no brainier for an immediate migration to the product for me. Darrell --- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Dave Doherty wrote: Not the last time I asked for it. They acted like they could not fathom why we would ever need it, and said they weren't even working on it. So I'm still on Imail. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it could .. Yes, that is absolutly correct - Declude will work on Smartermail. So I was just playing with the SM web

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Doherty
You are right. IMail has no such feature, either. With Imail, I currently take the user data right from the registry using the .NET registry classes, reformat it, and send it on to my gateway. Of course, if you use an external database with Imail you can run queries against that. It just seems

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Seems like it'd be trivial to write, hooking their svcUserAdmin.asmx and svcDomainAliasAdmin.asmx (GetAliases and GetUsers). Yeah, it'd be nice if they do it natively, but it looks like a 1 hour project to do it manually. Guess I wouldn't be too worked up about that. Jonathan Dave Doherty

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Kevin Bilbee
No declude does not pluginto SM's spam filtering. Delcude works pretymuch just like it does on Imail. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:57 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Jonathan- Thanks for pointing that out. I'm really surprised their tech support folks didn't recommend it. -d - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:09 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 /

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
No prob - being a dev myself, I tend to try to find the most complex ways to do things. ;) Jonathan Dave Doherty wrote: Hi Jonathan- Thanks for pointing that out. I'm really surprised their tech support folks didn't recommend it. -d - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Bummer... seems like they could make it work hand in hand, Declude and SM seem to be all buddy buddy .. that'd make a pretty powerful tool. Jonathan Kevin Bilbee wrote: No declude does not pluginto SM's spam filtering. Delcude works pretymuch just like it does on Imail. Kevin Bilbee

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
No it does not have this feature built in but Sandy wrote some nifty scripts that make this task a bit easier. . . . see my sig for details. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Yup, I've seen that in your sig for years .. just never had a use for it. :) Jonathan Sanford Whiteman wrote: No it does not have this feature built in but Sandy wrote some nifty scripts that make this task a bit easier. . . . see my sig for details. --Sandy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Sorry, was out on Thursday. Declude 2.0.6 has been working just fine on Imail 8.20 RC02 for about 2 weeks with no problems. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Thursday, April

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Matt Robertson
On 4/28/05, Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why didn't you point your CF server at smartermail? It gave me an entirely separate mail engine. I have customers with (legitimate) association mailing lists and in (small) part this lets me split the load. SM could handle that load, but