And my name .. but my name is probably on there several places over the
past several years.
It always baffles me why this isn't already built-in - Declude spent so
much time performance tweaking etc, then they leave the most
cpu-intensive stuff wide open. It's not like it evaluates the results
Add my name to the list of users asking for this.
John T
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:38 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Sub
David,
Unfortuantly, this is not a feature. It is one that we have been asking for
as well. If we ever get this feature I know for one thing I am going to
move F-Prot to my first scanner and enable this. Mcafee while a great
scanner it is very CPU intensive.
Darrell
--
Hey all,
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.
WE are currently running 2 antivirus filters and with the huge surge of viruses
the last couple days its come to my attention that I could spare a significant amount
of CPU if I could prevent my second antivirus from runn
For the foreseeable future Declude will be following a different release
strategy.
Beginning today we will be issuing Incremental Releases on a regular basis.
These releases should be regarded as Beta Code although they will be fully
documented and supported.
After a number of releases have been
Hi, I currently have my Declude config set to IPBYPASS my Imgate box. I
added clamav to IMGage via amavisd-new, but it is causing problems due
to amavisd-new's headers. It adds a received header when postfix passes
to amavisd-new, and postfix adds another header when it gets passed
back. So by t
Yes I've reverted back because Junkmail has catched many virus messages.
As we've had running vulnerability alerts containing a requeue link there
was a risk, that certain users click on a link to requeue an infected
message.
As we don't send out vulnerability alerts anymore maybe it would be an i
We are running SmarterMail 2.5 and came across the same problem. Any time
our customers were on a dynamic spamlisted IP, their email to others in
their office would get held as spam. Needless to say, this didn't go over
well. We fixed the problem with SPF. We run the SPF FAIL test, and then we
That would be awesome. We're planning a switch to SmarterMail soon so it
may be a non issue in the near future if they implement it.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
> Sent: Thursday, M
On 5 May 2005 at 1:11, Evans Martin wrote:
Hi Evans -
> Because I'm running 7.15 of IMail.
>> I'm talking about Junkmail; not Virus. I'm marking my own
>> outbound mail as spam in a lot of cases. I want to disable this
>> behavior.
How about a crediting filter file like mydomains.txt
STOPATF
Evans,
We have this on a list of possible enhancements for the very near future. It
would, however, be a global setting that applies to the entire server:
scanning inbound only, outbound only or both.
David Franco-Rocha
- Original Message -
From: "Evans Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Then you are stuck and can not stop what is happening with out WHITELIST
AUTH. YOU need to update imail to a version that supports the A attribute in
the Q file to tell imail this is an authenticated user. Either update Imail
or switch over to SmarterMail around August when they should support
WHIT
12 matches
Mail list logo
