RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Thoughts on why this "did not make it"

2005-05-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Yes, I would say the next step is to review the Message Tracking logs on their Exchange server.   John T eServices For You   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:26 PM To: Declude.J

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Thoughts on why this "did not make it"

2005-05-16 Thread Matt
Goran, Looks good to me.  Here's the Ipswitch KB on the logs that shows what each command means.     http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20030325-DM01.htm Both the 250 following the end of data and the status=1 means it was delivered successfully. Matt Goran Jovanovic wrote:

[Declude.JunkMail] Thoughts on why this "did not make it"

2005-05-16 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi,   This is the IMail log for a specific message that was sent through me to my client. The SendingDomain.com is actually whitelisted in their per domain whitelist file. On May 10 there were 3 messages from sender to receiver and 2 of them did not make it but one did. This is one of the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] German political spam

2005-05-16 Thread Nick
On 16 May 2005 at 23:49, Markus Gufler wrote: Thanks! -Nick > If someone is interested in, I've updated my sober-q filter files. > I've split the patterns in two files: SUBJECT and BODY lines. They > will not catch more but: > > 1.) The SUBJECT filterfile will be processed only if CMDSPACE has >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] German political spam

2005-05-16 Thread Michael Hardrick
http://www.joewein.de/sw/spam-sober-h.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Marchette Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 00:07 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] German political spam Anyone else getting hit with mass

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] German political spam

2005-05-16 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
Markus Wrote: If someone is interested in, I've updated my sober-q filter files. I'm interested! Thanks Markus! Bill Green dfn Systems --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude not deleting virus email

2005-05-16 Thread Matt
There's a new directive in the most recent beta that allows vulnerabilities to also be deleted. If this was turned on, only messages that failed banned extensions would be left in the virus directory. To get the beta, one has to log into their account on the Declude Web site where they will s

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible imail\declude issue

2005-05-16 Thread Matt
Yes, John is right in correcting me.  This would seem to indicate that the message wasn't fully received.  Try tracerouting to 216.16.233.16 in order to see if something is dropping packets.  It should automatically resend after a period of time if this is a normal mail server. Matt John To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude not deleting virus email

2005-05-16 Thread Dan Horne
Emails containing banned extensions and (I believe) vulnerabilities will not be deleted using DELETEVIRUS ON. It is best to use a script of some sort as a scheduled task to remove files older than x days from the virus directory. Dan Horne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude not deleting virus email

2005-05-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Will, Are you sure it is leaving viruses or vulnerabilities. In older versions prior to 2.0.6.10 Declude does not delete vulnerabilities which would fill up in your virus directory. Darrell invURIBL - Intelligent URI filtering plug-in for Declude. Stops 85%+ of

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude not deleting virus email

2005-05-16 Thread Will
I have my "DELETVIRUS ON" set, but the /spool/virus folder continues to fill up with too much mail. Is there something I am missing? Attached is my config. Will virus.cfg Description: Binary data

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible imail\declude issue

2005-05-16 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Incorrect. The missing line of the SMTPD log is a missing line, meaning either something interrupted the session or the lines are missing. Declude knows nothing of the message until after Imail SMTP service has received it in its entirety.   John T eServices For You   -Origi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible imail\declude issue

2005-05-16 Thread Matt
Harry, That's what happens when Declude blocks an E-mail with an action like HOLD or DELETE, or it gets blocked or deleted in Declude Virus.  You need to check your JunkMail and Virus logs to determine what happened. Matt Harry Vanderzand wrote: I have a complaint from a clinet of missi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible imail\declude issue

2005-05-16 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I have a complaint from a clinet of missing e-mails that have a record in his database but the e-mail was never received. Upon checking the logs I find entries as follows: 05:16 15:52 SMTPD(018600DC) [216.16.233.16] MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05:16 15:52 SMTPD(018600DC) [216.16.233.16] RCPT TO:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [157-09FD1BD3-C20C] Tests Running when WhiteListed

2005-05-16 Thread Don Brown
Exactly which WhiteLists do NOT prevent tests from running with PREWHITELIST ON? -OR- If it is easier, exactly which Whitelists DO prevent tests from running with PREWHITELIST ON? I think the entry WHITELIST IP 64.90.56.0/23 with PREWHITELIST ON is a case in which test should NOT be run. I'll cop