[Declude.JunkMail] Log file errors

2005-06-22 Thread David Sullivan
I've seen these errors for years, but never bothered to ask Does this mean my DNS server had a failure, or just that the domain it looked up does not have MX or A records? 06/22/2005 00:39:15 Qeb72438900c4923f WARNING: DNS server 66.179.12.115 returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for

[Declude.JunkMail] Something to mention about version 2.0X

2005-06-22 Thread Michael L. Hardrick
Greetings All, Is there any projection date for the next stable release of version 2.X? After removing our gateway mail server we had several problems with declude and dropped back to version 1.82. Since the change our server has been stable and we've seen no delays in mail delivery. It seems to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something to mention about version 2.0X

2005-06-22 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[Application popup: Declude.exe - Application Error : The application failed to initialize properly (0xc142). Click on OK to terminate the application] Not that this solves your problem, but I had the same exact issue with 2.0.6.What I found watching the logs in debug is that this is

[Declude.JunkMail] .NET and CMDSPACE test

2005-06-22 Thread Darin Cox
Anyone know how to get .NET's SMTP mail classto not fail the CMDSPACE test? Darin.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] .NET and CMDSPACE test

2005-06-22 Thread Matt
Darin, I believe that most if not all of Microsoft's mail clients (and likely scripting interfaces) will fail CMDSPACE, but MS SMTP will correct the condition for any E-mail that passes through it. So a possible work around, and maybe a better way to handle the E-mail, would be to have your