Also look at GDataPipe
www.gwacc.com/software.htm
It has been running on the Imail box for 6 months now and it has works
flawlessly as well. Cheap too.
Ty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fox, Thomas
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 6:29
google rinetd -- we set it up in about 5 minutes,
and it has worked flawlessly (meaning, I didn't have
to mess with it) since.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Colbeck, Andrew
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 6:23 PM
> To: Dec
Here is one application I've used, but not recently.
http://www.analogx.com/contents/download/network/pmapper.htm
I just tested it with portmapping ftp in passive mode and it worked
perfectly.
Andrew 8)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
There are several of those... gdatapipe is one. If you google the archives
for gdatapipe you should fine the others. I would argue that firewall-based
solutions are better, though.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 6:08 PM
Subj
I searched the archives but couldn't find what I was looking for.
Didn't someone post a link to a small software app that would run on the
mail server and would forward all traffic from port 587 to port 25. We are
not on the current Imail version so we can't use it's built in feature.
Thanks
Great. Hopefully they can get it fixed quickly so 3.0x will be stable.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Grosshandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Other Problem not fixed 3.0.5.5
Yup, plus logs, etc. Putti
I have been tweaking the THREADS value and found that small adjustments can
have quite large effects on CPU usage. I found a value of 15 is a good
compromise when processing 15-20k messages a day on a Xeon 1.4GHz dual
processor box with 1GB RAM. Any higher than 15 and I get 100% CPU for
minutes at
Yup, plus logs, etc. Putting it out here in case anybody else is seeing
same thing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 7:33 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Other
Hmmm... have you captured an offending message and sent to Declude support?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Grosshandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Other Problem not fixed 3.0.5.5
No changes to the co
