Matt,
SMTP Auth on port 587 is exactly why I
called them last week.
I recommend that everyone email [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting
support of submission port 587 in version 3.0 of smartermail. The only way it’s
going to happen is if they perceive a huge demand for it.
My own initial experience with their technical support was also less
than appealing, in fact I was a bit angry about how it was handled.
The person really wasn't too interested in helping to allay my
concerns, and when I suggested that it would be good to include the
capabilities that I was lo
Title: Message
Both identifiable
IP addresses are in Germany.
The only record inbetween was a
forwarding entry and should have been ignored!?
> > -Original Message-
> > Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84] by
> > hm-software.com with ESMTP
> > (SMTPD32-8.15) id A
I recently asked a question on one of the public forums regarding why the
server identified itself as the primary IP address assigned to the box
instead of the IP of the domain sending the email and received the same kind
of response. We may be reconsidering our choice of mail servers soon too if
I called smartertools last week to tell them that we needed "submission port
587" support in version 3 and that we also need the listserver to have the
ability to put the subscribers email address in the footer so that we can
identify AOLers who report list email as spam.
The guy on the phone w
yes, but I've been waiting all year for SM 3.0, with no end in site.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude with SmarterMail 3.0
Nice to know!
Now it's time to set up the n
