These are the text records returned from the blacklist. It might also
be Declude inserting the full lookup in the place of a text record when
none is present. This behavior is created when you set an action on a
test to WARN in the appropriate JunkMail file like so:
CBL WARN
You can in
> Where does the message "Blocked - see
> http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=222.173.57.68"; or
> "68.57.173.222.blacklist.spambag.org" come from? Is this something
> that comes from the blacklist, or is it defined by Declude?
It's a DNS text (TXT)
Also the press release that they circulated said 3.16d, but the link on their
web site says 3.16e.
Original Message
> From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:08 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] F-
Based on the following header lines...
X-RBL-Warning: CBL: "Blocked - see
http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=222.173.57.68";
X-RBL-Warning: DSBL: "http://dsbl.org/listing?222.173.57.68";
X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-BLOCK:
"http://www.mxrate.com/lookup/refused.asp?ipaddress=222.173.57.68";
X-RBL-Warn
This came up several times in the past, and I finally got around to
testing my dual Xeon server with hyperthreading turned off. I had read
in some places (like Tom's Hardware I believe), that certain
multi-threaded server applications did not perform as well with
hyperthreading as without hype
FRISK has just updated F-Prot for Windows to 3.16e and this purports to
include enhanced scanning capability for malformed WMF that appear as
other graphic formats.
The subscription login server is down with HTTP error 500 again.
Andrew 8)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ironically, those B*stards at MRC Marketing are about 30 miles from my
house. I wonder what they would do if I showed up on their door tomorrow >
>chat with them about their spamming?
My guess is they would probably have you arrested - but depending on how
your conversation went it might be
Whoa! Very cool. Seems to be more accurate than senderbase too. Thank
you!
Ironically, those B*stards at MRC Marketing are about 30 miles from my
house. I wonder what they would do if I showed up on their door tomorrow to
chat with them about their spamming?
> -Original Message-
>
Perhaps you/others might want to add this url to your toolbox.
http://ws.arin.net/whois/?queryinput=198.145.23.0
Palin Aquisitions Inc. PALIN-198-145 (NET-198-145-0-0-1)
198.145.0.0 - 198.145.255.255
MRC Marketing 198-145-23-0 (NET-198-145-23-0-1)
We're seeing spam from 198.145.23.1 - 198.145.23.254
This link will show you some of the other domains they're using.
http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchBy=organization&searchString=Universi
ty%20of%20Portland
Funny thing is the IPs are supposed to belong to the university of Portland.
W
Thanks a lot for the follow up and answer to your own post. It may help us
in the future. You are very kind.
I am glad you were able to solve the problem. regards
Luis Arango
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: MiƩrcoles
Good morning all,
I figured that I might save those that might respond some time...I found
and fixed the issue.
Turns out that the MS SMTP part of the metabase was still corrupt in
some way...not sure exactly how...and this was causing FTP of all things
to behave very, very slowly (while MS
12 matches
Mail list logo