PING
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
PONG
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Testing the Boards
PING
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
This
Is it just me or is other folks getting messages from the list from
yesterday today?
Darrell
David Barker writes:
Was it something I said ? :) PING
David B
www.declude.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Wednesday,
Snort will tell you in a heartbeat
-Nick
Marc Catuogno wrote:
I had my ISP (dsl.net) call and tell me that there was virus activity on our
circuit, namely port scans on 445 (maybe Sasser?). I have asked all my
agents to run the removal tool and do windows update. I have run Ethereal
but it
Marc,
Why don't you block 445 on the firewall (outbound) and look at the logs to
see where they are coming from?
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail,
mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue
PING
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
519-741-1222
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:22 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
POONGGG!
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall
find!
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Wednesday,
April 26, 2006
Hello,
Several months ago I got SPAMC32 working with my spamd server and reporting
scores to Declude properly (as far as I know). With Sandy's help I set it
up to use the following method:
SA1 external 1
c:\imail\declude\filters\spamc32\spamc32.exe -d spamd IP -u spamd -p 783
-cw
While I can't *guarantee* that it was working right with higher than
10 returns from spamd, here is what I see now.
'-et 10' means 'return an exit code of 10 if the SPAMD total weight
was greater than 10.' I like to look at it in terms of what SPAMC32
returns, not anything it can't
The sasser worm seems to ignore local networks and was only trying to get to
external IPs. I tried ethereal and got no probes on the local net. I did
lock down 445 external but the Xincom has really weak logging so I couldn't
get any info from it. Thanks though
I unplugged one switch at a
Send him to Remax :)
Matt
Marc Catuogno wrote:
The sasser worm seems to ignore local networks and was only trying to get to
external IPs. I tried ethereal and got no probes on the local net. I did
lock down 445 external but the Xincom has really weak logging so I couldn't
get any info
There were some talk on the list about SpamReview earlier.
Is anyone except John using it? Does it work OK?
We use Imail 8.22 and really would like to find a way to work with all the
messages in /spam/hold directories.
Jonas Fornander - System Administrator
Netwood Communications,LLC -
Thanks for the suggestion, Sanford.
OK, I removed the -y for all the POSTIVE SA tests (SA1-SA10) and then
created the following rule in local.cf:
body MY_SPAMASSASSIN_RULE/this is a test of spamassassin/
describe MY_SPAMASSASSIN_RULETest of my spamassassin rule
score
Jonas,
We have an application similar to SpamReview. We are currently seeking a
very limited set of beta testers for called fpReview. It supports both
imail and smartermail.
If you or anyone else are interested please contact me offlist.
If you are interested in seeing some screen
We still use it, but are developing a replacement. It has trouble parsing
the headers for info at times, but otherwise does what it was intended to
do. It will work fine with 8.22.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Jonas Fornander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
This looks really cool, Darrell.
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview
Jonas,
We have an application similar to SpamReview. We are
Looks good. At first glance, one thing that would prevent me from
switching is that I would have to go through each message individually.
With SpamReview I can scan the top list showing the important info (to,
from, subject, domain) to eliminate 90% of the work. Then I only have
to review
John,
Are you not using the latest beta? All of those features are there (to,
from, and subject) in the listview?
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude
SPAMC32: Loading C:\imail\Declude\filters\SPAMC32\Enjoy.eml
9.4/5.0
SPAMC32: Loading C:\imail\Declude\filters\SPAMC32\cbn.eml
28.0/5.0
Let's look at the SPAMC32 side of these first. What's the ERRORLEVEL
after SPAMC32 runs each of these?
Next, we can look at whether/why SPAMD is acting
FYI, I have not got back to you Jonas as I have been quite busy.
I will see what I can do to send you the instructions by Saturday.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thanks for the offer but you don't have to.
I'm currently testing Darrell's fpReview and it works great.
Highly recommended.
Jonas Fornander - System Administrator
Netwood Communications,LLC - www.netwood.net
Find Out Why We're Better - 310-442-1530
21 matches
Mail list logo
