The proof-of-concepts which have been tested on multiple versions also list
a not vulnerable category if other versions have been tested.
I get the feeling that Ipswitch has washed its hands of the previous
version that is more than 90 days old. They take a passive approach to
security;
Hi,
I finally was able to get a confirmation from Microsoft Support yesterday
afternoon (case: SRZ060911001854)
We are aware the issue you are experiencing. A corresponding bugcheck
request is currently open, and the develop team is working on this issue.
However, the hotfix for this issue is
The SMTP engine is largely unchanged since 8.0 was released. 2006
deals primarily with webmail thus far, and these other services have
only been tweaked and not rewritten. I assume that all of 8.x is
vulnerable regardless of the source of the information on the list
which was not disputed. I
Why admit it unless your hand is forced? Since when did most
corporations own up to their faults simply to be good netizens? Then
there's always the anti-corporate train of thought that believes it is
possible that they don't mind such issues existing on old software
since it can cause
Andy,
Not sure if you saw it but this issue was brought up on Slashdot
yesterday, so it got some exposure.
Heimir
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I finally was able to get a confirmation from Microsoft Support yesterday
afternoon (case: SRZ060911001854)
We are aware the issue you are
Title: Global config for 3.11
Can I trouble someone to send me their standard global config file that came with junkmail 3.11?
I just want to see which tests have been added/changed from the config I'm running (2.06)
I will be doing the upgrade next week as tomorrow is my last day for
The SMTP engine is largely unchanged since 8.0 was released.
Geez, man, that is completely untrue. If that's your premise, sorry,
that debate is on your planet, I'm not going there
Safari support is in 2001.1 for the first time.
Then it's pretty strange how there's not a single post
My reading of Kevin Gills' message on 9/11 was that most everything but
rich text editing now works, and that rich text support will be in the
next release. Naturally I haven't tested it, and it definitely needs
testing before committing Mac users to this interface. See below:
Hi All,
My reading of Kevin Gills' message on 9/11 was that most everything but
rich text editing now works, and that rich text support will be in the
next release.
Not my reading...
Yes, we have added Safari support (all but the rich text editor) in
the last sprint. This will be available in an
Confirming my take on the situation, Kevin just posted this to
IMail_Forum:
Thanks for your feedback and yes, Safari is a bit cantankerous.
Firefox/Mac has been okay but not Safari.
It turns out we just fixed (in the last few business days) the last known
issue with Safari. We
10 matches
Mail list logo
