Regardless of which anti-virus program you are using, you can easily add ClamAV
to give you an extra layer of protection (and it's free). Besides, I've often
seen ClamAV pick up new viruses long before F-prot adds them.
Gary
Original Message
> From: "Serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Karl, I tested the script and I found that, if my log file is BIG, the
error appear, I tested with a 10 and 18MB and worked perfect, then, with a
40MB, file the error showed up.
My log files are around 100MB; last Sunday there was a spam surge and it
grew up to 365MB :-(
May be it would be n
For the cost of f-prot on an smtp server, we have disabled it. We have
virus scanning running at our firewall, soon on our inbound relays, as well
as AVG with Declude. Each layer is a different engine at a different layer
of the transaction leaving us comfortable that we are catching what we can.
We have abandonded F-Prot due to the excessive pricing modle. We have
Symantec gateways that deliver to SmarterMail with declude/AVG.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 5:33 PM
To: declu
For those on 4.2.X, are you still using Fprot and/or McAfee ..., or are
sticking with buit in AVG alone ?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
Ok, I'll add another few cents due to popular demand. I do wish however
for this to not become a thread with personal attacks or charges, which
I why I tend to step away from such discussions.
I had a client who is a publically traded bank complete their annual
FFIEC audit today. Two of my s
"Great Scott!!"
... Well with the clarity of 20/20 hindsight, I used mail-archive.com
with the IMail forum to see what you guys have talked about so fondly.
Ugh. I don't miss that noise at all.
The interesting thing is, how many people in those threads are still
around *here* today. Also, that
> I actually miss the twice annual entertaining discussions on the
Imail forum
> between Scott and Len with Sandy added for spice.
It almost happened a couple weeks ago, on a BIND newsgroup, where I
brought something up and Len jumped into the conversation. It was a
moderated newsgroup, thoug
I use the home edition for my machines at home and it's a nice program. The
Outlook Exchange plugin is a little slow to start up but doesn't seem to
cause any problems like Symantec email scanning sometimes does. Definitions
seem to get updated regularly (sometimes several times per day).
_
Does anyone have experience with Avast as an Antivirus solution for the
desktop. It also comes with a command line scanner. They have a server edition
also.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing the wa
Just create an empty user.junkmail file. As there are no actions, the user
will get all of the messages.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dean Lawrence
> Sent: Friday,
Kim,
You could just set the action to IGNORE. You cannot fully turn of
scanning, but by setting the IGNORE action, all mail will pass through
the system.
Dean
On 12/15/06, Kim Premuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone tell me what to put in the per user 'user.junkmail' file that would
ca
Now, to be fair, I am only using ORF for very simple blocking and I am only
using the following list of tests, so comparing my ORF stats with Alligate
is not appropriate:
Malformed HELO
HELO matches recipient domain
Valid REVDNS
Sender blacklist, either domain or email address
Attachment blocking
Ditto! 95%+ with Alligate.
-Jay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:42 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Interesting ORF stats
Hi John,
John T (Lists) wrote:
>
Can someone tell me what to put in the per user 'user.junkmail' file that would
cause all messages to effectively be whitelisted for that user (user does not
want anything tested by JunkMail)? Currently, all tests are set to 'WARN', but
that's not producing the desired results.
Thanks!
Kim W.
Hi John,
John T (Lists) wrote:
I have 3 gateway servers running IIS with ORF. These are my MX records for
all my domains.
ORF has identified and blocked 71% of incoming email on my primary gateway.
ORF has identified and blocked 81% of incoming email on my secondary
gateway.
I see the secondari
>>Goes to prove spammers are still trying the lowest priority MX record to
>>get
>>around spam filters.
That is very true. I think the mindset is that folks don't have access to
features like IPBYPASS and trust mail coming from their backup mail server
by default.
Darrell
Messageexcept around review time...
- Original Message -
From: Chris Asaro
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Why are these being whitelisted?
Question Authority..
Chris
Did I start this? LOL! Sorry!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:40 PM
To: Darin Cox
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Interesting Discussions
> Have you been eating some slightly pu
How do we get a copy of the JunkMail.cfg without running the full
installer? I don't see it otherwise available in the client logon
interface or elsewhere on the Declude site.
Thursday, December 14, 2006, 2:15:03 PM, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
M> Chris,
M> 3.x or 4.x will work with IMail 8
20 matches
Mail list logo
