[Declude.JunkMail] Resend email caught by Declude/Sniffer

2006-12-20 Thread Postmaster
I had a rule set that was a little too exuberant (since been fixed) in catching spam. How can I queue up the caught spam to be resent and filtered for spam? Thanks, Kevin --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],

[Declude.JunkMail] automated response

2006-12-20 Thread craig
I am out of the office from Wednesday the 20th of December 10.00am until Thursday the 21st of December 3pm, a short period of less than 48 hours. I will be checking my email during that time so if you do have an urgent request it will be attended to but not as quickly as usual. CLOSING TIME

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Resend email caught by Declude/Sniffer

2006-12-20 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If you would like them to be reprocessed by Declude you can do the following below. Declude (service version) - Drop the files into the proc directory off the spool. If you are running the non service version drop the q* into the overflow directory and the d* into the spool directory. If you

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist IP for one domain

2006-12-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
I have a client who needs to have mail that is being sent from a particular IP to be whitelisted. I don't want to whitelist this IP for all of my other domains though. How might I go about this? I looked at the whitelistfile option, but that doesn't accept an IP. Any thoughts? Thanks, --

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How to condition on attained weight

2006-12-20 Thread Matt
You can do this with two filters, but not one. In the first filter you would have the following: SKIPIFWEIGHT 10 REMOTEIP 0 CONTAINS . In the second filter you would add at the top: TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS NAME-OF-THE-FIRST-FILTER Matt Don Brown wrote: Can anyone tell me

[Declude.JunkMail] Cosmetic Bug or Buffer Overrun?

2006-12-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, this doesn't seem to impact function - but note how the Declude-inserted Return-Path header arbitrarily truncates the MAIL FROM information (of course, I'm hoping that this is not an indication of some buffer-overrun vulnerability in the current code): 12:20 13:30 SMTPD(813901dbdae6)

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Avast antivirus

2006-12-20 Thread Doug Traylor
Does anyone have experience with Avast as an Antivirus solution for the desktop. It also comes with a command line scanner. They have a server edition also. I use the home edition for my machines at home and it's a nice program. The Outlook Exchange plugin is a little slow to start up

re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist IP for one domain

2006-12-20 Thread Gary Steiner
It's better to weight your whitelist rather than have an IP be fully whitelisted. You would have an entry like this WHITELIST-IPipfile C:\{MAILSERVER}\Declude\Filters\WHITELIST-IP.txt x -20 0 In the file WHITELIST-IP.txt you would have something like this 123.456.78.90

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist IP for one domain

2006-12-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
Hi Gary, Thanks for the suggestion. This is actually what I ended-up doing. I was hoping to not have to define a rule in my global config file though for this one domain. Oh well, hopefully this client will take my suggestions to fix their server configuration so it doesn't fail the revdns and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cosmetic Bug or Buffer Overrun?

2006-12-20 Thread David Franco-Rocha
Andy, The Return-Path is not added by Declude. It is added by the email client that receives the email. David Franco-Rocha - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:50 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Cosmetic Bug or Buffer Overrun?

2006-12-20 Thread Sanford Whiteman
The Return-Path is not added by Declude. It is added by the email client that receives the email. Not by the client, but by the server application performing final delivery to the mailbox, signifying that the message has left the SMTP stream. --Sandy