RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errorlevel not working

2009-02-09 Thread Andy Schmidt
Because it does a = comparison, you need to start with the greatest value and work your way lower. -Original Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Serge Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 7:58 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Errorlevel not working

2009-02-09 Thread Serge
ok, now i understand thank you both BR Serge - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt andy_schm...@hm-software.com To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 12:15 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errorlevel not working Because it does a = comparison, you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Errorlevel not working

2009-02-09 Thread Sanford Whiteman [Mobile]
IMO, no reason to use the shortcut IF ERRORLEVEL when the regular IF %ERRORLEVEL% allows you to do the = comparison and more. --Sandy --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom Processing

2009-02-09 Thread Dave Beckstrom
What filter will trigger on the words John Cummuta when the from address is formatted like: From: John Cummuta startover-4676...@allstockdirect.com Neither the mailfrom or headers filters are triggering on this. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom Processing

2009-02-09 Thread David Barker
This may not be the actual sender, the actual sender is what is found in the envelope or q*.smd (IM) or *.eml (SM) and found in the X-Declude-Sender line. If you need a filter the best way would be to use the regular expressions such as: HEADERS 0 PCRE(?im:From:.*John Cummuta) David

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mailfrom Processing

2009-02-09 Thread Dave Beckstrom
David, I don't have an X-Declude-Sender configured. I'll add that. Okay, so I already have Headers contains John Cummuta or something along those lines set up. How would the regular expression be any different? Is it more effective because of the wild card? -Original Message-