[Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, Despite all the shortcomings of SPF, there may be one GOOD use: Every once in a while I receive requests to whitelist certain sender email addresses or domains - then I explain that we don't like to do that because it would allow any spam that PRETENDS to come from that domain to pass.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
Andy, Since there is already an SPF Pass, Fail, and Neutral result, couldn't you just create a rule that if the sender passes SPF that you apply a large negative point value? Then you could apply that rule to only the domains that you want to whitelist. Dean On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:47 AM,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
A true WHITELIST would mean that: a) it could skip over all the other tests right from the start b) it would work even if you have some tests that DELETE emails! Your scheme would not prevent emails from being killed outright by Sniffer or similar content tests. -Original Message- From: