RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-05 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
I had seen the problem with a beta install of Outlook 2003 and had hoped
that the release version would have that worked out.  I soon found that
to not be the case.  Of course, I've seen other programs (Goldmine is a
notable example) that trip the spamheaders test.  Forms from webpages
fail it as well.  I still assign the test a weight (and a fairly high
one, at that), but the action for that test itself is just set to
SUBJECT in my config.

~Katie


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Winberg
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:50 PM
To: DLAnalyzer Support
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] 420e with Outlook 2003




Build I have is: 11.5608.5606  (release build)


Scott

Monday, November 3, 2003, 1:13:32 PM, you wrote:

DLAnalyzer Is anyone else compensating for this with a filter?

DLAnalyzer HEADERS -3  CONTAINS X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook,
Build 11.0 

DLAnalyzer Has anyone else seen any different builds?  The build below 
DLAnalyzer should be the
DLAnalyzer release build. 

DLAnalyzer X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510

DLAnalyzer Darrell

DLAnalyzer  
DLAnalyzer Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for 
DLAnalyzer Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com


DLAnalyzer R. Scott Perry writes:

 
 Good morning, I just started using Outlook 2003 and I am now failing

 the
 Spamheader test with code Code: 420e. The E-mail failed the 
 SPAMHEADERS test.
 
 This is due to a bug in Outlook 2003 -- I'm not aware of a Microsoft 
 fix
 for it yet. 
 
-Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail 
 mailservers. Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader 
 in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been 
 missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)] 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
 unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
 http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
DLAnalyzer ---
DLAnalyzer [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
DLAnalyzer (http://www.declude.com)]

DLAnalyzer ---
DLAnalyzer This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To

DLAnalyzer unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
DLAnalyzer and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can 
DLAnalyzer be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.



-- 

 Scottmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] ldeliver interpretation

2003-11-12 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery

If, when I run find ldeliver sys.txt /c, I get 20,699 is that the
number of messages that Imail is receiving before Declude Junkmail Pro
scans our incoming mail or after?

Thanks, 
Katie

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ldeliver interpretation

2003-11-12 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Okay, so is there a way I can get a count before scanning by Declude?  I
want concrete data to take to a meeting where we will evaluate if a new
machine or upgrade is necessary.  CPU usage has been very high with smtp
and Declude being the biggest users.  The machine is 400mhz w/ 384mb
ram.  CPU average this afternoon has been 68% but hangs at 100% for long
periods at a time.  Ldeliver count for yesterday was 20,699 and rdeliver
was 3,725.

As always, I appreciate your help.

Thanks, 
Katie


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ldeliver interpretation



If, when I run find ldeliver sys.txt /c, I get 20,699 is that the

number of messages that Imail is receiving before Declude Junkmail Pro 
scans our incoming mail or after?

After.

So if Declude JunkMail deletes/quarantines any E-mail, it will not be 
included in the count.

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance

2003-12-04 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message



Hi there, 


I have a customer 
who was having trouble with his messages sent to users on servers that use spam 
filters not being delivered. I had him send a message to me so I could see 
what tests it fails. As some of you may have already guessed, he's got a 
new pc with Outlook 2003 and the messages fail the spam headers test. I 
informed him that among mail server and/or spamfilter administrators this is a 
known issue. So, he calls MS. MS says it's OEM software, call the 
vendor. Dell says I'm full of it. 

So...

Would someone with 
more thorough and better understanding than mine please send me something (with 
permission to quote or I'd just lift from archives) that I can send to this 
customer? I'm looking for what it is that Outlook 2003 does wrong and what 
RFC it is not conforming to. He wants to then show it to Dell and request 
an exchange for Office 2002. 

I would much 
appreciate it. I'm sorry to make this issue that isn't really mine yours 
too. But, it might just be handy to have this kind of information on hand 
anyway as more people start using this product.

Thanks, 

Katie
(Who will try to 
stop gritting her teeth now.)



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We can retire now

2003-12-17 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message



My 
alter ego is a salesperson for a computer center (my boss owns the computer 
center and the ISP--I do sales for one and network admin for the other). 
At least once a week, often more, I get a call supposedly from a hearing 
impaired person using a relay operator. This person always has a different 
name but the same request--they want me to drop ship notebook pc's and charge 
them to a credit card. Now, these calls come through the ATT and 
Sprint relay services--legitimate operations. When I have called them they 
say they are aware of the scam but are legally obligated to perform the relay 
duty. However, they both told me that if I simply ask the operator if the 
caller is using a home device for TTY or is using an Internet siteI'll be 
given a straight answer. The scam calls are always using the Internet 
sites. We have "real" deaf customers here in town. They call using 
the Montana Relay, they can provide call-back numbers, etc. So, there are 
some ways of distinguishing the legit calls from the fraudulent one. 


In any 
event, I simply tell all callers that it is our policy not to drop ship 
merchandise ordered over the phone to be charged to a credit card. 
About two years ago we were asked to ship a large quantity of memory to a 
location in Colorado. It seemed odd that someone from CA would call 
someone in MT to ship memory to CO. The caller claimed they had been 
referred to us by one of our customers--which was plausible but it still smelled 
fishy. We declined unless payment was in the form of a cashier's 
checked. Another reseller in town fell for it. It was a big enough 
hit to hurt them very badly. They are no longer in 
business.

~Katie


  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 
  7:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] We can retire now
  http://msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=3730401p1=0
  
  Good to find the 
  signature for this email .. 
  
  Has anyone seen 
  this?
  
  Regards,
  Kami


[Declude.JunkMail] Analyzing logs

2004-02-06 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message



Hi there, 


I think I've seen 
reference to a means before by which one can analyze the Junkmail logs to see 
which rules or DNSBL's are being most effective. However, I can't find it 
again now. The Junkmail config I have on our Imail server is working 
well. I've been asked to config Symantec Antispam for SMTP on an Exchange 
server. No DNSBL's are currently being used. I'd like to see which 
ones are catching the most in my Declude Junkmail config as I am limited in how 
many I can use on the Symantec Antivirus product. 

Thanks, 

Katie



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working.....

2004-02-10 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working.


Ah, perhaps you have more time to spend on your antispam system than I
do!

Andrew 8)

-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working.


Ah, but the Kill.lst is an envelope rejection.  It saves many more
resources this way.

Jason


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 2:03 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working.


Bennie, blocking spammers by their domain name only is a losing
proposition. You're already using SBL... I'd suggest that you also
implement the SORBS tests and the MAILPOLICE tests.  

Checking my own spam, we also received mail from this spammer, but we
caught it without having to check for their domain name du jeur.

Andrew.

-Original Message-
From: Bennie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working.


Hello all.

I was asked some time ago to add a domail to my kill list.. I added it.
But the customer is still recieving spam from this domail.  They sent me
the headers (I have them listed below) and I see the domail in the
headers.  but I never see where it failed the KillList.

Headers---

Received: from mail.ramthehole.com [66.110.74.50] by mail.pepperlink.net
  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A398669F0140; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:52:40 -0500
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:57:24 -0500
Subject: Exclusive X-Soaked Model Photos
From: Budapest Bukkake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mailer Software (rev. 01/15/2004)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=iqxhhbldriaiwihk
X-RBL-Warning: SBL: http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL12919
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 66.110.74.50
with no reverse DNS entry.
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 12 reaches or exceeds the limit of
10.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.110.74.50]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com)
for spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SBL, SORBS-SPAM, NOLEGITCONTENT, REVDNS, WEIGHT10
[12]
X-Note: QueInControl: D6398669f014033a3.SMD (1)
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SBL, SORBS-SPAM, NOLEGITCONTENT, REVDNS, WEIGHT10
[12]
X-Note: RDNS Real Origin: [No Reverse DNS][66.110.74.50]
X-Note: SMTP Real From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: SMTP Real To:
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from [No Reverse DNS] ([66.110.74.50]).
X-RBL-Warning: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 12.
X-RCPT-TO:
Status: U
X-UIDL: 374908735

Here is the entry in my killl list file

.ramthehole.com  ID-20040204-pep007

here is the line from my GLOBAL.CFG

KFROMfromfile  e:\imail\declude\fromfile.txt x
15 0
KFrom   WARN

Line from $DEFAULT$.JUNKMAIL

KFROM   WARN X-RBL-Warning: This E-mail failed the KILL File test

Thanks
Bennie



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by CENTRIC INTERNET SERVICES]




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by CENTRIC INTERNET SERVICES]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe 

[Declude.JunkMail] Perplexed -- false positives on HELOBOGUS AND CATCHALLMAILS

2004-02-10 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message



As of today I've got 
something odd going on with our Declude Junkmail. Any assistance would be 
great appreciated!

A great many emails 
are failing HELOBOGUS and CATCHALLMAILS (which is commented out in my default 
junkmail file).

Here is one example 
header:

Received: from 
eciexchange.ECI [63.160.64.141] by mail.centric.net with ESMTP 
(SMTPD32-8.05) id A3421E7500AE; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:22:10 
-0700content-class: urn:content-classes:messageMIME-Version: 
1.0Content-Type: 
text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
quoted-printableSubject: test message at 10:20X-MimeOLE: Produced By 
Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:24:41 
-0700Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: test message at 
10:20Thread-Index: AcPv+sQ9Ad5U9lRhT8C4qVudgOLZJw==From: "Ken DeCosta" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]X-RBL-Warning: 
HELOBOGUS: Domain eciexchange.ECI has no MX or A records.X-Note: This E-mail 
was scanned by Centric Internet Services for spam.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: 
HELOBOGUS, CATCHALLMAILSX-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: 
UX-UIDL: 349899319

Here's my default 
config (I just changed action on HELOBOGUS from delete to warn a few 
minutes ago):

DSBLDELETEORDBDELETESPAMCOPDELETEDSNDELETENOABUSEWARNNOPOSTMASTERWARNBADHEADERSSUBJECTHELOBOGUSWARNMAILFROM 
WARNPERCENTDELETEREVDNSWARNSPAMHEADERSSUBJECTAHBLDELETEDSBLMULTIDELETENJABLDELETERSLDELETESBLDELETESORB-SMTPDELETE

#SNIFFERBOUNCE

WEIGHT10DELETE#WEIGHT15DELETE#WEIGHT20DELETE

## The following tests are commented out by default because they 
are not commonly# used (or require a subscription).#

#BADWHOISWARN#BLARSWARN#CATCHALLMAILSWARN#COMPUWARN#DEVNULLWARN#DORKSWARN#DORKZTLWARN#DSBLALLWARN#DUL 
WARN#FIVETENDULWARN#FIVETENOPTINWARN#FIVETENOTHERWARN#FIVETENSRCWARN#FLOWGO 
WARN#GUARDBLOCKWARN#GUARDBULKWARN#GUARDDULWARN#GUARDMULTIWARN#GUARDSINGLEWARN#GUARDSRCWARN#HEURWARN#INTERSILWARN#IPWHOISWARN#NJABLWARN#NJABLDULWARN#POSTFIXGATEWARNRBLWARN#RSSWARN#SELWERDWARNSPAMBAGWARN#SPAMTRWARN#SUMMITWARN#V6NETWARN#VISIWARN#WIREHUB-DNSBLWARN#WIREHUB-DYNAWARN#ZTAWARN

#RBLWARN#DULWARN#RBL+DULWARN#RSSWARN#RBL+RSSWARN#DUL+RSSWARN#MAPSALLWARN


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-03 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Was the transaction for renewal posted on your cc or dc?


Katie LaSalle-Lowery
ka...@centric.net
1120 S. Russell; Ste B
Missoula, MT 59801
ph (406)549-3337
fax (406)541-9338

-Original Message-
From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:r...@igive.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:32 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

You can probably contact the message sniffer folks directly.  There's not much 
about Declude itself that requires updates, so long as it is working.

http://armresearch.com/

Good luck,

Rob



-Original Message-
From: declude [mailto:decl...@mail.net1media.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:22 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

Last Wednesday (3/27/2013), I renewed my Declude and Messaage Sniffer service 
agreements.  A full week later, they both still come up as expired.  All phone 
calls and emails have gone unanswered.  I left voice mails for Tech support, 
Sales and the phone number previously listed on this list for John.  I emailed 
both support at declude and jprovost at declude.com.

I don't know where to go from here.

A very sad time for Declude.

Don





Sent via the WebMail system at net1media.com






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just 
send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just 
send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-09 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
David has helped me with a Declude issue quite recently as well.  I have always 
received good support from David and Linda and look forward to continuing to do 
business with them and wish them the best of luck in their new venture!


Katie LaSalle-Lowery
ka...@centric.net
1120 S. Russell; Ste B
Missoula, MT 59801
ph (406)549-3337
fax (406)541-9338


-Original Message-
From: declude [mailto:decl...@mail.net1media.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 5:59 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

Sadly, no one from Declude has ever gotten back to me.  On the plus side, my 
credit card was never charged.

In a very gracious move, David Barker reached out to me.  He and Linda spent 
their own time and got my problem resolved!  They have started a new business, 
Mails Best Friend.  It is new and they are still working out the details.  He 
can be contacted at  david.bar...@mailsbestfriend.com.  With this kind of 
service, I expect to see great things from them.

Don


-- Original Message --
From: SM Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date:  Mon, 8 Apr 2013 16:10:57 -0700

So, has no one still heard nothing from Declude? This is my favorite anti-spam 
service and I would hate to lose them.

Ben
  - Original Message -
  From: declude
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:21 AM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?


  Last Wednesday (3/27/2013), I renewed my Declude and Messaage Sniffer 
 service agreements.  A full week later, they both still come up as expired.  
 All phone calls and emails have gone unanswered.  I left voice mails for Tech 
 support, Sales and the phone number previously listed on this list for John.  
 I emailed both support at declude and jprovost at declude.com.

  I don't know where to go from here.

  A very sad time for Declude.

  Don




  
  Sent via the WebMail system at net1media.com






  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.








Sent via the WebMail system at net1media.com






---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.