RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-09 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
David has helped me with a Declude issue quite recently as well. I have always received good support from David and Linda and look forward to continuing to do business with them and wish them the best of luck in their new venture! Katie LaSalle-Lowery ka...@centric.net 1120 S. Russell; Ste B M

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-03 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Was the transaction for renewal posted on your cc or dc? Katie LaSalle-Lowery ka...@centric.net 1120 S. Russell; Ste B Missoula, MT 59801 ph (406)549-3337 fax (406)541-9338 -Original Message- From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:r...@igive.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:32 PM To: D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Perplexed -- false positives on HELOBOGUS AND CATCHALLMAILS

2004-02-10 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Okay, but why is CATCHALLMAILS even coming into play? I had it commented out (always have). It has never shown up as a warning in the headers before. Just started showing up. Thanks, Katie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry

[Declude.JunkMail] Perplexed -- false positives on HELOBOGUS AND CATCHALLMAILS

2004-02-10 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message As of today I've got something odd going on with our Declude Junkmail.  Any assistance would be great appreciated!   A great many emails are failing HELOBOGUS and CATCHALLMAILS (which is commented out in my default junkmail file).   Here is one example header:   Received: fro

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working.....

2004-02-10 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:34 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill List not working. Ah, perhaps you have more time to spend on your antispam system t

[Declude.JunkMail] Analyzing logs

2004-02-06 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message Hi there,   I think I've seen reference to a means before by which one can analyze the Junkmail logs to see which rules or DNSBL's are being most effective.  However, I can't find it again now.  The Junkmail config I have on our Imail server is working well.  I've been asked

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We can retire now

2003-12-17 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message My alter ego is a salesperson for a computer center (my boss owns the computer center and the ISP--I do sales for one and network admin for the other).  At least once a week, often more, I get a call supposedly from a hearing impaired person using a relay operator.  This perso

[Declude.JunkMail] A little CMA documentation for Outlook 2003 RFC non-compliance

2003-12-04 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message Hi there,   I have a customer who was having trouble with his messages sent to users on servers that use spam filters not being delivered.  I had him send a message to me so I could see what tests it fails.  As some of you may have already guessed, he's got a new pc with Out

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] "ldeliver" interpretation

2003-11-12 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Okay, so is there a way I can get a count before scanning by Declude? I want concrete data to take to a meeting where we will evaluate if a new machine or upgrade is necessary. CPU usage has been very high with smtp and Declude being the biggest users. The machine is 400mhz w/ 384mb ram. CPU av

[Declude.JunkMail] "ldeliver" interpretation

2003-11-12 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
If, when I run find "ldeliver" sys.txt /c, I get 20,699 is that the number of messages that Imail is receiving before Declude Junkmail Pro scans our incoming mail or after? Thanks, Katie --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail cam

[Declude.JunkMail] Not scanning outgoing

2003-11-06 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
Title: Message   Just as a test, I'd like to make sure we're not scanning outgoing messages (temporarily).  Besides commenting out the tests on outgoing, is there something else to do?   ~Katie  

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-05 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
I had seen the problem with a beta install of Outlook 2003 and had hoped that the release version would have that worked out. I soon found that to not be the case. Of course, I've seen other programs (Goldmine is a notable example) that trip the spamheaders test. Forms from webpages fail it as w