I know I'm not aware, care to expand?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:59 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Overflow directory and a note about
Declude/Imail Gurus,
We have been seeing a problem, almost exclusively with comcast.net for about
three months now. It's one of those intermittent problems that Mail Admins
love. This may be a Imail problem, but I thought I'd check here first.
Every so often (every couple days, weeks), at random
We are currently
debating putting a 300,000 line filter file into our production environment.
This filter file would have many different variations of certain "bad" words,
words we all see everyday in our spam hold files. This test would specifically
be a BODY test.
Examples would
be:
Where can we get this program to try it out?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 10.59
To: JunkMail Declude
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DLA Test Downloaded
There have been many downloads today of my
to BLOCK a list of e-mail addresses.
Can I put a filter entry into their $default$.junkmail that does the
opposite of WHITELISTFILE?
Thanks
__
Aaron Moreau-Cook
Acumen Associates, Inc.
Network Architect
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
being resent. If I open Spam Review (or look
C:\IMail\spool\spam) I will see a message with 31 points. Any ideas why?
Thanks in advance!
__
Aaron Moreau-Cook
Acumen Associates, Inc.
Network Architect
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
Thanks Scott, did the trick!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ROUTETO S/F
We store forward a client's e-mail for them, and
Rick,
Would you mind posting a copy of this file?
Thanks much!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Davidson
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images
I have had good luck
Declude List,
First, let me apologize for the vulgarity of the e-mail I have attached
below.
Second, has anyone found a effective way to deal with this type of spam?
This e-mail apparently was under our HOLD limit of 10, so it was forwarded
onto our client (concealed for his protection). I could
All,
Would this command below catch APPLE if it was in a BASE64 attachment? Are
Attachments considered part of the body.
BODY 15 CONTAINS APPLE
Thanks
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Thanks Scott, my concern is text that is BASE64 encoded to APPLE being
caught by the check.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
I'm a bit confused. Which one is the correct syntax?
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
or
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
Thanks,
Aaron
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Public thanks to everyone. My brain is feeling small today... so I had to
ask what could be perceived as a dumb question!
Thanks again, glad everyone here is so helpful!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Childers
Sent: Wednesday,
Declude List,
Sorry for the off topic post, but we are scratching our heads on this.
We have migrated a customer of ours who is using IMAP, however performance
is very poor compared to I-Mail 6.06. Other customers who use the same
server report that POP and SMTP have increased in speed.
The
This is a bit off topic, sorry!
Let me start by proclaiming, I hate spam. It gives me headaches to no end,
though Declude is preventing it from getting to our customers which makes
them happy and makes me happy as well.
We have a problem, where SpamCop or someone, will contact us claiming they
We already assign weights to SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS, BASE64, etc etc
However we would like to do something that may be a bit unique.
If a message matches SNIFFER SPAMHEADERS, we would like to just delete it.
Can we combine tests and create a new action off of that?
Thanks
---
[This
16 matches
Mail list logo