.reverse.microgistix.com.).
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
Yes indeed. Just changed it. All fixed.
The problem here is with your HOP/IPBYPASS settings:
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E
Any chance that SPAMDOMAINS can have three entries. MSN uses Qwest DSL
in my neighbourhood.
Is there another way to handle this?
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
I just started seeing junkmail that is addressed to an everyone@ the
mailserver domain name. It looks like the real message was sent to an
email address at a domain hosted on that mailserver and the everyone@
was added. Is this a new technique?
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned
.
So now how about a ATTACHTO action that attaches and forwards to a
mailbox.
Many Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
administrators love it because it takes the
mail away from users but still leaves it intact. Company principals love
it because sensitive mail is at least semi-concealed from mail
administrators when they forward an FP message.
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
BADHEADERS2 badheaders x x 0 0
I use weight or weightrange.
Thanks
David Stavert
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL
Scott
How about a new Manual page. The last released version was in early
December and there have been a ton of new things added. It is getting
harder and harder to search through the archives to find clarification
on a feature.
Many thanks.
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I understand but there are far too many changes between releases and
many interim releases between betas. Beta is usually a set of features
and fixes and then a release. With Declude there are new features with
every beta. Freeze something and release it.
Thanks
David Stavert
-Original
Scott
I'm going to appologize again.
FWIW, the reason we use this unusual beta cycle (where each
beta normally both adds new features and fixes bugs, rather than
having an
initial beta with tons of new features and subsequent betas just
fixing
bugs) is because we're able to get more
special offers to be sent and generally act responsibly about their
Internet use. If there are no policies then the filtering etc will
become more and more out of control.
Thanks
David Stavert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hopkins
Before you reset the time have a look at what the stock market is doing
and make some really informed buying decisions. Perhaps, considering how
things are today you might just want to stay in the future.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
In a corporate setting a company may or may not have an
Internet/email/conduct policy. If not, it may be very dificult to fire
someone for conduct that they didn't agree to abide by and if it came to
a lawsuit they would probably loose. In fact the company could loose
twice. Once by someone who
Content alone is not the criteria for condemning an email. I may personally
dislike the message but if it is subscribed, to hands off. It is far to
easy, when we control the switch, to let our own tastes, beliefs, and
prejudices, influence our trigger finger. Many large companies have
outsourced
The program alias could be used effectively if it were a web generated email
message. It could be hosted on another machine/os/programming language etc
if it were all handled as a program alias.
Create a couple of examples and Administrators could modify to their hearts
content.
David
Could we
Not really. It could use Declude Confirm. Fill out a page add your email
address. The web page mails a confirmation (make sure this is what you want)
and mail it back to start the process. No login required.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Several contributors to this list have talked about or have shown
preliminary tools. We started working on something as well a few wekks ago
as well. It might be worthwhile to pool the work already begun or take
something that has a promissing start.
David
Is this something that is
Scott
This is a message that arrives from the EzMTS mailserver to IMail/Declude.
David
I have a customer that uses EzMTS, a Windows freeware
mailserver. When ever
a message goes through that server and Declude all the Xheaders added by
Declude show up in the body of the mail. Can I
I have a customer that uses EzMTS, a Windows freeware mailserver. When ever
a message goes through that server and Declude all the Xheaders added by
Declude show up in the body of the mail. Can I assure him that it's his
problem (EzMTS).
David
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
We have used a combination of
WEIGHT10ATTACH
WEIGHT10a ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The combination sends the junkmail as an attachment. The real value with
this is that the original TO address is maintained in the attached message.
If it is legitimate then the email with the
Perhaps this list might be a way to set up test account exchanges??
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fighting the
Mark
Any help on nuclear fusion would be helpful as well. But only if you have
time! ;)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Scott
That little list would be perfect in the manual. It's come up many times.
Worth a cut and paste just as it is.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL
Do you have WHITELISTTO postmaster?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Foulks
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
What is the HELOBOGUS test? I've not
by myself
No but I do WHITELIST my domain..
greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I was spammed by myself
Do you have WHITELISTTO
mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:34:33 -0700
Received: from 209.18.231.160 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:34:33 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [209.18.231.160]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Stavert [EMAIL
Scott
The domain in question is not local. Looking through the Declude logs I find
things
06/14/2002 02:56:50 Qa1c03fd60048eaef ERROR: Could not find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in recip file.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Odd behaviour
Scott
The domain in question is not local. Looking through the Declude logs I find
things
06/14/2002 02:56
I will be installing IMail 7.1 this weekend. The delivery rules allow for a
forward to a mailbox based on a filter. I am hoping that will make all this
work. The attach feature will keep the original message intact and allow a
domain manager to take the responsibility for retrieving and
Add away.
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List
I'm already doing this. I have a program on the server that runs
of Office feature now?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List
Importance: Low
Add away.
Thanks
David
-Original Message
Does anyone have a name for the tool that retrieves mail and then
destributes it to the exchange server. I have used it in the past. I believe
there is one from Australia but there may be others. I just had a use for it
come up today.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude in front of exchange servers.
Does anyone have a name for the tool that retrieves mail and
then destributes
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude in front of exchange servers.
No idea.
Try http://www.slipstick.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Stavert
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Scott
If the sendto can be someone other than the recipient it will be perfect. If
the email can go to the postmaster at the domain for instance. In
multidomain or forwarding situations it spreads the load and gives a domain
administrator the ability to fine tune the setup.
David
-Original
I shiver in anticipation
Thanks
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] v1.47 (beta) released
If the sendto can be someone
I have been through this s number of times. Savvis will probably just do
recursive queries. As I assume they have large blocks of addresses so the
root number servers point to Savvis which will then hand off the query to
your server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the IMail AV software but have not installed it yet. I am running
both Declude AV and JM. I will install it this weekend and test it a bit.
Let you know what I see.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent:
Scott
Just noticed that the manual.htm for junkmail shows
simply rename the \IMail\Declude\junkmail.cfg file to junkmail.bak. in
the Emergency Uninstall section.
David Stavert
Netraprise Systems, Inc.
79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612.317.9065
612.317.9062 FAX
---
[This E
In future you might want to assume you are wrong BEFORE you ask the
question. ;)
David
As usual when I assume something I am wrong :)
Stu
At 02:39 PM 01/16/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Is it a correct assumption that if 4 weight tests are
defined (weight5,
weight10, weight15, weight20) and
GPL files attached.
Did your log files show any errors (such as No recipients found in
BANNOTIFY.eml)?
With ver 1.33
01/14/2002 12:44:24 Q270628e Scanned: Error in virus scanner. [MIME: 2
45210]
With ver 1.32
01/10/2002 11:53:27 Qd51666a Scanned: Banned file extension. [Prescan
OK][MIME: 3
the mail will have
no message body. I didn't try it to see what part of it failed, how many and
what statements make it fail but it is a problem.
David Stavert
Netraprise Systems, Inc.
79 13th Ave NE, Suite 112
Minneapolis, MN 55413
612.317.9065
612.317.9062 FAX
XINHEADER X-Note
Scott
I tried adding CC %ALLRECIPS% to the BANEXT email template hoping to have a
copy go to the recipient as well. Is it possible??
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL
Scott
Thanks.
Get some sleep. ;)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist NOT honored
I tried adding CC %ALLRECIPS%
44 matches
Mail list logo
