Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail Server Vulnerabilities...

2005-05-24 Thread Jonathan
Huh? What? Not useful? IPSwitch is charging thousands of dollars for that very feature on steroids .. G Jonathan Darin Cox wrote: Was the webmail vulnerability only with web calendaring? We might be able to get away with turning it off. It hasn't been a very useful product for our

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-20 Thread Jonathan
the most basic things.. :\ Jonathan Kevin Bilbee wrote: Best thing to do is call SmarterMail Sales. They are knowledgable on the product and the features slated for the 3.0 release but definitly call htem and let them know you would like to see Program Aliases. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Jonathan
assume 2006. Any thoughts? Jonathan --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Jonathan
Rats. I was hoping I was totally off-base, and all these features were actually hidden in the program or configs somewhere. Not really sure how thrilled I am about moving our customers' servers over without some of these items. Jonathan Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango wrote: I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How to stop second virus scan when first captures the virus.

2005-05-05 Thread Jonathan
from all the scanners, and makes a decision on whether or not it's a virus or a false-positive. Back in the early days, I had a hunch they would come out with a Pro version, and stuff like this would be in there .. but then they did come out with a Pro, and still no dice. *confused* Jonathan

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Scanning

2005-05-04 Thread Jonathan
I think you're looking for virus_domains.txt - it has inbound only, outbound only, both, etc options. Jonathan Evans Martin wrote: So there is no way to turn off outbound scanning? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-29 Thread Jonathan
Yeah, I haven't played with smartermail in much depth, but I assumed a global filter could be created based on header, then have Declude mark up the headers accordingly.. Jonathan David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote: Declude does not currently plug directly into SmarterMail's spam tools

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
I missing something? Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it could .. Jonathan --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Sidenote, I assume SmarterMail can act as a domain filtering gateway with Declude, right? Pretty sure I saw some marketing spam saying it could .. Yes, that is absolutly correct - Declude will work on Smartermail. So I was just playing with the SM web

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Seems like it'd be trivial to write, hooking their svcUserAdmin.asmx and svcDomainAliasAdmin.asmx (GetAliases and GetUsers). Yeah, it'd be nice if they do it natively, but it looks like a 1 hour project to do it manually. Guess I wouldn't be too worked up about that. Jonathan Dave Doherty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
No prob - being a dev myself, I tend to try to find the most complex ways to do things. ;) Jonathan Dave Doherty wrote: Hi Jonathan- Thanks for pointing that out. I'm really surprised their tech support folks didn't recommend it. -d - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Bummer... seems like they could make it work hand in hand, Declude and SM seem to be all buddy buddy .. that'd make a pretty powerful tool. Jonathan Kevin Bilbee wrote: No declude does not pluginto SM's spam filtering. Delcude works pretymuch just like it does on Imail. Kevin Bilbee

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Jonathan
Yup, I've seen that in your sig for years .. just never had a use for it. :) Jonathan Sanford Whiteman wrote: No it does not have this feature built in but Sandy wrote some nifty scripts that make this task a bit easier. . . . see my sig for details. --Sandy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Problem with subject line in version 2.0

2005-02-01 Thread Jonathan
Hanging on the new licensing routines? g This is why I never run stuff in production till it's old and tested. Jonathan At 11:30 PM 2/1/2005, you wrote: I had the same problem today while installing v2.0. All Declude functions stopped. I called them and went back to the old version and everything

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer vs. SURBL

2005-01-09 Thread Jonathan
one of their new features, is whitelisting publicly traded companies. :) Jonathan At 12:30 AM 1/9/2005, you wrote: Hi, Today I finally took the time (I didn't have) and ran both Sniffer and SURBL Tests (using http://www.invariantsystems.com/invURIBL/). Result: 1,860 tagged by invURIBL only

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Utility

2005-01-04 Thread Jonathan
grep? :) Jonathan At 09:45 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote: Is there a utility that you can type the message ID and get back the reasons a test failed tests..instead of going into the logs and pulling it out.. Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support Crossroads

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo Bulk Mail

2004-06-08 Thread Jonathan
Thanks, but I doubt that's the issue. They're on one of our IP blocks, and have had that IP for .. I dunno .. several years. Surely somewhere in Yahoo! there's a department where you can address these issues. I haven't been able to find out where, though. Jonathan At 11:21 AM 6/8/2004, you

[Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo Bulk Mail

2004-06-07 Thread Jonathan
the best way to get out of Yahoo's filters? Thanks in advance, Jonathan --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Google Gmail.com

2004-04-01 Thread Jonathan
As much as I believe FoxFriends morning show tells no lies .. I'd rather verify it with a reputable source: - Google does in fact own Gmail.com - It sits on the Google network - gmail.google.com == gmail.com - and www.Gmail.com says 1000 MB. I'd say that makes it official. Jonathan At 03:06 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT? Best Plattform?

2004-02-04 Thread Jonathan
. Nutsehell, I'd say there are some performance benefits on 2k3, especially on larger hardware .. but overall, your install *should* be so tweaked, that it really doesn't matter. Jonathan At 02:56 PM 2/4/2004, you wrote: 2003. It's MUCH more secure than 2000 because many services

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New CMDSPACE test in latest interim release

2004-01-07 Thread Jonathan
that .. *shrugs* Jonathan At 05:06 AM 1/7/2004, you wrote: Scott, It took about 1 minute to figure out that this will be a very valuable test as I'm seeing similar hit rates. What matters most though is the type of thing that will FP, and what other tests will generally fail along with it. I'm

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New CMDSPACE test in latest interim release

2004-01-07 Thread Jonathan
Imail web stuff never gets scanned anyway, does it? I thought it hit imail1.exe directly .. Jonathan At 06:44 AM 1/7/2004, you wrote: on 1/7/04 6:35 AM, Matthew Bramble wrote: BADHEADERS will FP a whole lot more, Over 95% of the outgoing messages from our subscribers are failing the CMDSPACE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New CMDSPACE test in latest interim release

2004-01-06 Thread Jonathan
Can't imagine why you'd need to restart .. it hooks the EXE each time it spawns an smtp thread, so the next message after the EXE is in place, should use the new exe. Jonathan At 07:20 PM 1/6/2004, you wrote: It has been a while since I upgrade my versionare there any special step

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

2003-12-20 Thread Jonathan
a bit, considering it's mostly text. Is there a compelling reason to go with win2k3? Jonathan At 12:12 PM 12/19/2003, you wrote: For the majority, W2K3 is the way to go if you are able to. Ipswitch does support running Imail on W2K3. There are some possible issues. 1. Running MS DSN service

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

2003-12-19 Thread Jonathan
support it well yet. g Thoughts? Jonathan At 05:04 PM 12/4/2003, you wrote: The issues seem to appear at high volumes. Besides, I am more than willing to use those licenses for you. ;) John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

2003-12-04 Thread Jonathan
(and *robust*) now? Relatively high volumes of email .. Jonathan --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail Tests and Configs

2003-11-12 Thread Jonathan
I'm sorry, when I said the help files .. I meant the online manual. Those are the files I used as a reference. Jonathan At 08:13 PM 11/11/2003, you wrote: In an effort to clean up our junkmail configs, and only use valid tests, we cleaned out our previous tests (old services that were dead

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer wanting servers?

2003-11-12 Thread Jonathan
He wants 2,000 IPs? Sure, no problem .. in fact, I'll give him a whole class B. 10.123.x.x :) Jonathan At 05:22 PM 11/12/2003, you wrote: Hi Scott- Where on the tools page is this nifty test located? :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain Folders for Custom $default$ file

2003-11-07 Thread Jonathan
is it safe to put *all* the redirects in global.cfg? Jonathan --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain Folders for Custom $default$ file

2003-11-07 Thread Jonathan
I don't understand - I thought you said if it was a gateway domain (presuming that means it doesn't actually have a host entry in imail, just that imail is acting as a relay for it), to put the REDIRECT in global.cfg. But now you're saying it doesn't look there for REDIRECT? Jonathan At 11:42

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain Folders for Custom $default$ file

2003-11-06 Thread Jonathan
I'm sure I'm missing something, but that doesn't seem to be working. In my D:\Imail\Declude\$default$.junkmail, I have: REDIRECT @domain.com d:\Imail\Declude\templates\group1.cfg and, in that group1.cfg file, I have copied the file that used to work in: d:\imail\declude\domain.com. I removed the

[Declude.JunkMail] Auto White Listing

2003-09-27 Thread Jonathan
to that user. Is the spam blocked when it comes into the alias? or does it see that it ultimately hits that user, and allow it? Thanks, Jonathan --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Auto White Listing

2003-09-27 Thread Jonathan
At 01:15 PM 9/27/2003, you wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 5:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Auto White Listing With the auto whitelist feature,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is stealing traffic from your domain.

2003-09-22 Thread Jonathan C Miller
The MS example I saw was to use a domain that ended .local if you did not want to use a real/public domain. This seems to work, lets hope that .local never becomes a real tld. Sincerely, Jonathan Miller Internet Service Department ACCS.net Advanced Computer Communication