[Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jose Gosende
Does anyone know of any vulnerabilities in iMail 6.06? Within a minute after turning on iMail's SMTP service my server becomes completely unresponsive and eventually goes down. I've also installed all of the 6.06 related patches from Ipswitch's site. Jose --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jose Gosende
Of Jose Gosende Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities Does anyone know of any vulnerabilities in iMail 6.06? Within a minute after turning on iMail's SMTP service my server becomes completely unresponsive and eventually goes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail 6.06 vulnerabilities

2004-07-16 Thread Jose Gosende
6.06 vulnerabilities If you are using LDAP that is completely and horribly hackable and I don't think there is a patch below 7. Marc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Gosende Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.JunkMail] OT - Managed firewall

2004-07-12 Thread Jose Gosende
Anyone out there know of a good managed firewall solution? Please contact me directly. Many thanks in advance, Jose Gosende --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.718 / Virus Database: 474 - Release Date: 7/9/2004

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: ORBD Question

2004-06-29 Thread Jose Gosende
Title: Message ORDB has listed one of my mail servers as being an open relay. However, I have it set to "Relay for local users only" (running iMail 6.06) so I'm not sure why it'sclaiming to be an open relay. Can someone shed some light? TIA, Jose

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: ORBD Question

2004-06-29 Thread Jose Gosende
Thanks to all. The answer is in the URL below, in case anyone has this problem in the future. http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20021108-DM01.htm Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:50 AM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS Failure question

2004-06-04 Thread Jose Gosende
Why did this fail the REVDNS test? If I do a reverse DNS lookup for precisionx.net I get a valid PTR record back. TIA Received: from precisionx.net [216.119.112.51] by fpmamail.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A02C4790076; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:07:24 -0400 Received: from DedA50 [216.119.112.51]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS Failure question

2004-06-04 Thread Jose Gosende
OK, thanks. Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS Failure question I guess I'm confused as to why it's coming from this IP

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS Failure question

2004-06-04 Thread Jose Gosende
I guess I'm confused as to why it's coming from this IP 216.119.112.51 when I've specified the MX record for precisionx.net to point to 65.110.77.72 Thanks, Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS Failure question

2004-06-04 Thread Jose Gosende
) for spam. X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, SPAMHEADERS [3] X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: 120 Status: U Thanks once again. Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jose Gosende Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 11:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: SmarterMail any good?

2004-04-14 Thread Jose Gosende
Do any of you run SmarterMail? What are your opinions? As part of a hosting package SmarterMail is being given to us for free and I'd like to know what other people's experiences have been with it before we use it in a production environment. Thanks, Jose --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus

[Declude.JunkMail] HOLD on domain

2004-03-03 Thread Jose Gosende
Is it possible to hold mail, with the lite version, based on the domain of the sender? TIA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.610 / Virus Database: 390 - Release Date: 3/3/2004 --- [This E-mail was scanned for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HOLD on domain

2004-03-03 Thread Jose Gosende
The cost to upgrade is the difference in $$ between versions, right? ie: $246 to go from lite to std Thanks, Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Removing characters- subject

2003-11-07 Thread Jose Gosende
Where can I find Junkmail's readme file? I need to block email with the usual bad words in the subject and body, but can't find documentation on how to do this. TIA -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kami RazvanSent: Friday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Removing characters- subject

2003-11-07 Thread Jose Gosende
Thanks. Are any of these links accessible through the site? I couldn't find them. Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 12:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Removing

[Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Question

2003-08-14 Thread Jose Gosende
Legitimate email is failing the BADHEADERS test. Do I need to modify something on my server so this test does not fail? Thanks --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Question

2003-08-14 Thread Jose Gosende
Interesting. Thanks for the info! Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Question Legitimate email is failing the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Question

2003-08-11 Thread Jose Gosende
Why would I need to upgrade my mail client? It's a ColdFusion page that's sending the email, by the way. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

[Declude.JunkMail] HOLD Question

2003-07-29 Thread Jose Gosende
I've been using a very effective (and quite aggressive) WEIGHT value of 12 and holding mail where the SPAMHEADERS test failed until now. I recently found out that certain pieces of my website, where email is supposed to go out and notify me, is being held due to JunkMail and the rules I've setup.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-21 Thread Jose Gosende
I've seen that most of the spam emails, regardless of the weight, seem to fail the SPAMHEADERS, BADHEADERS, and IPNOTINMX tests. Question: do you guys HOLD email based on any of these three tests? If so, how is this done? Is this a smart approach? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-21 Thread Jose Gosende
Great, thanks for the detailed explanation. I would like to HOLD all mail that fails the BADHEADERS test, then. How do I go about doing this? Thanks again -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:40 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-21 Thread Jose Gosende
Thanks. One last question, since certain email addresses are more likely to receive more spam than others, is it possible to apply different tests/actions based on the TO address? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday,

[Declude.JunkMail] Config Question

2003-07-18 Thread Jose Gosende
I have this in my default file: WEIGHT10HOLD WEIGHT10A ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEIGHT20HOLD And this in my GLOBAL file: WEIGHT10weight x x 10 0 WEIGHT10A weightx x 100 WEIGHT20weight x x

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Config Question

2003-07-18 Thread Jose Gosende
OK. So, what's the proper syntax to HOLD and ROUTE the email to me? ie: is this valid? WEIGHT10HOLD,ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Config Question

2003-07-18 Thread Jose Gosende
Do you have any suggestions for me to accomplish this? I'm sure other users have done something similar before. Thanks again, Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Config Question

2003-07-18 Thread Jose Gosende
Got it, thanks for your input. I guess I will use ROUTETO for a few days and switch back to HOLD at some point. Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

[Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-17 Thread Jose Gosende
All, Being a 2 months-old user of JunkMail I'm trying to find out best practices for dealing with spam. Sorry in advanced if this topic has been to death, but I couldn't find any helpful threads on the archives. Anyhow, I'm using the following rules but a TON of spam still making it through:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-17 Thread Jose Gosende
How can I determine the amount of caught/received emails with JunkMail? It would take me an eternity to go through each log file. Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:01 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail v6 and Windows Update

2003-07-17 Thread Jose Gosende
for Ver. 6. This is per Ipswitch KB article IM-20021218-DM01 HTH, Denny - Original Message - From: Jose Gosende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:12 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail v6 and Windows Update wow, and I thought

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-17 Thread Jose Gosende
Karl -- I would be very interested in using your PERL script. Can you send it to me? Thanks, Jose -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:

[Declude.JunkMail] language limitation?

2003-06-05 Thread Jose Gosende
I'm not exactly sure how the JunkMail engine works, so I apologize in advance if this is a rookie question. Although JunkMail does a great job of catching English-based junk emails I still get very basic Spanish and Korean (I think) spam emails. So, does JunkMail catch non-English junk mail? Any