Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Larry Craddock
13 hours @ 480mbps it'd take approximately 20 minutes Just guessing but that may be more of an issue than the method you use. As suggested, the quickest way is to remove the drive from the USB package and connect it directly to your IDE interface. Larry Craddock - Original Message

[Declude.JunkMail] MS Sender ID

2004-09-22 Thread Larry Craddock
hmm ... not everyone's jumping on board http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,96022,00.html Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklisted again

2004-09-16 Thread Larry Craddock
Good suggestion and if you're not familiar with linux and don't have time to learn right now just get the windows version. You'll need to install winpcap first and then ethereal. You can get them both here: http://www.ethereal.com/distribution/win32/They work great. Larry Craddock

[Declude.JunkMail] ROUTING

2004-08-31 Thread Larry Craddock
[5] X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-FRANCE-UNITED STATES-destination thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.JunkMail] braindead

2004-07-11 Thread Larry Craddock
Can someone point me to the webpage that checks a domain against all the open relay lists? thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] braindead

2004-07-11 Thread Larry Craddock
Thanks Bill Larry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] braindead www.dnsstuff.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude

[Declude.JunkMail] single user problem

2004-06-04 Thread Larry Craddock
I move mail beyond a certain weight to a suspect mailbox. Is there a way to NOT do that for just one account? thanks, Larry Craddock

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-28 Thread Larry Craddock
Thanks Bill. I checked the archives and found one from Nov.28,2003 ... just got it setup. thanks again, Larry Craddock - Original Message - From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

[Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail manual

2004-05-27 Thread Larry Craddock
Has the link to the manual changed? http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm no longer works. Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail manual

2004-05-27 Thread Larry Craddock
: [Declude.JunkMail] Junkmail manual The link in your email worked for me although the final destination was: http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=116 jeff - Original Message - From: Larry Craddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 7:44 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail

[Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Larry Craddock
that's needed besides enabling the test? Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamdomains test

2004-05-27 Thread Larry Craddock
Thanks everyone. Now that I understand how to use the test, does anyone have a spamdomains.txt file that includes the entries for the domains most commonly used that they could share? Larry Craddock

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-18 Thread Larry Craddock
I don't know if it's 32 bit but the .dat files are on the same page and the heading they're under is VirusScan Version 4.x (or higher) Daily Updates. So it looks like you can get the updated pattern files at the same place. Larry Craddock -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-17 Thread Larry Craddock
Someone have the link to CLAM-AV ? thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

[Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-15 Thread Larry Craddock
Title: Message Can anyone tell me how f-prot compares to mcafee or symantec when it comes to keeping their database up with new viruses? That just seems pretty cheap but hey that's exactly what I'm looking for as long as it works well :) thanks, Larry Craddock

[Declude.JunkMail] Printable manual

2004-05-03 Thread Larry Craddock
Is there a manual suitable for printing (not the html page) available on the website? thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail

[Declude.JunkMail] Any recommendations for MS Exchange spam filter?

2004-04-21 Thread Larry Craddock
Anyone know if there's anything similar to declude for MS Exchange server? thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.1 Trouble

2004-04-12 Thread Larry Craddock
I'm running Imail 8.10 with Declude 1.79 and I've had to restart the Imail services a couple of times since the upgrade. Should I be running a different version of declude? thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.1 Trouble

2004-04-12 Thread Larry Craddock
This may be duplicated ... if so, please ignore. I'm running Imail 8.1 and Declude 1.79 and have had to restart Imail services a couple of times since upgrading. Should I be running a different version of Declude? thanks, Larry Craddock - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.1 Trouble

2004-04-11 Thread Larry Craddock
Looks like the website has been updated since this post. Where can I get the interim release now? thanks, Larry Craddock -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 6:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

2004-01-13 Thread Larry Craddock
These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised? More like spammers are forging habeas headers and challenging habeus' ability to prosecute. Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

2004-01-12 Thread Larry Craddock
-Note: This E-mail was sent from pD95378AF.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.120.175]). X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: U X-UIDL: 319325114 thanks, Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

2004-01-12 Thread Larry Craddock
for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to http://www.habeas.com/report/. Now what do I do? Larry Craddock - Original Message - From: R

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS

2004-01-12 Thread Larry Craddock
Do most people use WHITELIST HABEAS? I'm thinking of turning this off since the large majority of spammers have already demonstrated their willingness to ignore the legality of their activities. Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

2004-01-12 Thread Larry Craddock
Cool ... I'll report it right now. - Original Message - From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:04 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted? Well I'm not sure how I missed this ... but here's the *rest* of the header info:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST HABEAS

2004-01-12 Thread Larry Craddock
Good point and I do agree with one minor counter point ... we have little to no feedback about how *the police are handling the situation.* I reported the incident to Habeas and here's a snippet from their response: [Please know that at Habeas we take the use of our trademark in spam very

[Declude.JunkMail] W32/swen

2003-10-14 Thread Larry Craddock
I'm fairly new to this and guessing there's a simple way to catch these? Larry Craddock Received: from dns1.atuacao.inf.br [200.203.92.130] by netride.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.03) id A0F770A00C0; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 07:49:59 -0500 Received: from udsikd ([200.203.92.14]) by dns1.atuacao.inf.br