Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam not being marked

2005-07-13 Thread Mike Hyslip
how is it configured? Darrell invURIBL - Intelligent URI filtering. Stops 85%+ of SPAM with the default configuration... http://www.invariantsystems.com Mike Hyslip writes: WEIGHT10SUBJECT**SPAM: WEIGHT14SUBJECT **SPAM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam not being marked

2005-07-12 Thread Mike Hyslip
configured for WEIGHT10 and WEIGHT14. Also, are those configured as WEIGHT's or WEIGHTRANGE? Darrell - DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting on Declude Junkmail and Virus. http://www.invariantsystems.com Mike Hyslip writes: I am having

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam not being marked

2005-07-12 Thread Mike Hyslip
In your global config how is it configured? Darrell invURIBL - Intelligent URI filtering. Stops 85%+ of SPAM with the default configuration... http://www.invariantsystems.com Mike Hyslip writes: WEIGHT10 SUBJECT **SPAM: WEIGHT14

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO !

2004-07-12 Thread Mike Hyslip
Declude can always have an option to edit a file by hand, or just display each current value, test, etc and let changes be fine tuned there and have it write the config file itself. I also think it would be nice for it to either have a global include file for the default junkmail file (for when

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding delivers spam

2004-06-21 Thread Mike Hyslip
Would marking the subject still allow the Imail rules to process on the receiving end? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Hyslip
I know others have mentioned higher CPU load with body searches and the like, and most like searching through the entire attachment text for matches to a filter? Just a guess here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT IMail Backup/Restore

2004-06-11 Thread Mike Hyslip
When you make a backup of Imail's user/domain settings, it might keep the original drive paths so check it's reg file that is created in case you need to do a find/replace -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Friday, June

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Junk Mail Test

2004-06-09 Thread Mike Hyslip
I believe outlook 2003 can cause this if it is connecting without authentication. If that is the client youre using, try enabling authentication for sending email and see if that clears it up? I had that happen, being marked as spam sending myself a test message. M From:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: GREP Help Needed

2004-05-29 Thread Mike Hyslip
find whatever value is common to all of those (and hopefully nothing else) If interface 2 is 10.0.6.1 then grep for that value. If there are other interfaces on that device that would also match that (such as 10.0.6.10 or 10.0.6.100 ) then you can cat filename | grep “10.0.6.1 ” temp file

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSstuff Website

2004-05-20 Thread Mike Hyslip
My plan B in those situations is another tech who's still on site :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSstuff Website Nick wrote:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering for HELOs that are IP Addresses

2004-05-19 Thread Mike Hyslip
I think some folks had some custom rules that did this, but I think they also looked for numbers between dashes, such as 201-34-98-103..xxx Maybe some others can shed a bit more light than I J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-18 Thread Mike Hyslip
I believe you can also download a trial version for f-prot for Windows, test it out a bit and see how you like it. At least cheap enough to see If you want to spend more :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter Sent: Tuesday, May 18,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2004-05-15 Thread Mike Hyslip
Title: Message I will ditto this. I used the 16 bit trend command line application, and was having trouble keeping up with 15-20k messages a day. I switched to F-prots 32-bit command line scanner and I dont even see it pop up in the task manager it moves so quick. Very big improvement,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Updating Global.CFG

2004-04-15 Thread Mike Hyslip
It is for user SMTP authentication. To bypass relay settings and show you're really a user of the server when sending an email (so you can relay while off the local network) - since you're an authenticated user, you can choose to whitelist any emails from that particular session. Mike

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Scott, what do you use to generate this report

2004-04-14 Thread Mike Hyslip
That is because end users apply programs how they WANT, now how the writer intended hehe... Nice program, thank you for your time investing to help us as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:43 PM