RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-10 Thread Robert Grosshandler
How are you determining that commtouch isn’t working? From: Rick [mailto:redbara...@qwest.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:53 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude? Well their site has been down for at least 8hr so far and from what I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-10 Thread Robert Grosshandler
in your global.cfg file AT 2:18 Pacific time today mine was still working Use the links below and download the data. John _ From: Robert Grosshandler [mailto:r...@igive.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:00 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?

2013-04-03 Thread Robert Grosshandler
You can probably contact the message sniffer folks directly. There's not much about Declude itself that requires updates, so long as it is working. http://armresearch.com/ Good luck, Rob -Original Message- From: declude [mailto:decl...@mail.net1media.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on

2011-02-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
That actually was a feature already built by someone many moons ago. He was / is a Declude user. It used to be listed on the declude site. http://www.eservicesforyou.com/products/autowhite.html -Original Message- From: David Barker [mailto:dbar...@declude.com] Sent: Thursday, February

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail

2010-09-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
(that you should be able to create automatically with a script). Robert From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:17 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail Hi All

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail

2010-08-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
? Cheers, Eddie From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 9:17 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail Hi All - We're currently using Imail v2006. We had no need

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail

2010-08-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
gateway. Wouldn't Domainkeys/Dkim still work without needing to change everyone's email address? Cheers, Eddie From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 9:17 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail

2010-08-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail I was about to upgrade my SmarterMail server this evening. What kind of issues are they having with 7? - MEC From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent

[Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail

2010-08-27 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi All - We're currently using Imail v2006. We had no need to upgrade and the iMail versions until this year didn't support some features we needed (primariy DomainKey / DKIM signing of outbound mail. ) We'd considered moving to Smartermail, but it didn't (and doesn't) support a feature we

[Declude.JunkMail] Configuration Suggestion Requested

2010-05-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We get a reasonable number of spam /virus laden emails with the following characteristics. 1) Sent to multiple recipients 2) A single line in the email, consisting of a URL. The email is probably being sent by infected machines. It comes from legit email addresses.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] We have opened up truncate.gbudb.net

2010-04-30 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi If we're running Sniffer, and we set this up as a Declude test (we're not able to reject connections based on the info), isn't it being double counted (once from SNF, once on its own?) Thanks, Rob From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael

[Declude.JunkMail] Outlook

2010-04-12 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi Occassionally, we're getting false positives on the email to us containing: [Outlook 'MIME segment in MIME Postamble' Vulnerability] I'm sure they do contain that problem, but false in that they're not malicious (I don't think.) People still blocking on this? Thanks, Rob

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
From what I read, Interceptor (which we tried in its earlier incarnation, eons ago) doesn't include the Hijack functionality (the design wouldn't support it.) Rob From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dan Shadix Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:15 PM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] Help Me Add Weight

2009-02-10 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Sounds like a spam headline, doesn’t it? Anyway, we’re getting obvious spam, but we’re not able to weight it enough to block it. Any tests you might suggest. The following came to us BCC’d, I believe. Nothing about it was appropriate for us. Here are the headers: Received: from

[Declude.JunkMail] Need Filter

2008-04-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi All - Rather than learn something new (my brain is overfull, and still feels empty), I'm hoping somebody has a filter or guidance for the following need. I don't want to move to per-user configurations if I can help it. I'd like to have a filter that adds weight when an email fails a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.

2008-04-09 Thread Robert Grosshandler
The PCRE for yahoo.co.uk might just be the ticket. Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:58 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.

[Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.

2008-04-08 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We're getting spam that comes via Yahoo, looks good (but it isn't). We'd like to up the score it receives, so it won't get passed through. We use Sniffer/Declude/Inviurbl. We're almost always Bcc'd. Sometimes fails Sniffer, sometimes not (we've got a query into them, too.) Doesn't always

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need strategy to up score.

2008-04-08 Thread Robert Grosshandler
recipients not listed in the headers. BCC BCC 3 x 6 0 Where 3 is the number of BCC recipients and 6 is the weight given. David B -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Tuesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email

2008-02-25 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Blocking Email Rob, We are using domain keys and reverse DNS as well as SPF records. Do you have a link to where I would request the whitelisting? Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Thursday, February 21

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Yahoo Blocking Email

2008-02-21 Thread Robert Grosshandler
More. Yahoo has whitelisting, and really cares about reverse DNS pointers and Domain Keys. You might want to resubmit, they were fast for us way back when. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Thursday, February 21,

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Failover advice

2007-12-03 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Gents and the occasional lady: You all are the smartest network folks I interact with. If you'd be so kind as to give me your opinion / suggestions on the following, I'd be forever grateful. We're trying to increase the level of uptime and redundancy for our service. To that end, we're looking

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bulk Outbound Mailer

2007-07-02 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We're really happy with gammadyne mailer. www.gammadyne.com We send about 200K pieces a week, the db is sql server. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 4:29 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Barracuda False Positive Reporting

2007-06-06 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi All - Our opt-in newsletter is being rejected by users with Barracuda firewalls as spam. I'm looking for a single place to report this / request to be whitelisted at Barracuda, and I'm having no luck. Any pointers appreciated. Thanks in advance. Rob Robert N.

[Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We get e-mails that contain the following header (or something similar): Received: from igive.com [71.250.241.101] by smtp.igive.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-9.20) The 71.xxx.xxx.xxx isn't ours. That IP can vary, but it is never ours. Are there any legit mailers that would send something in this

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Robert Grosshandler
15 IS igive.com Set it at your hold weight. Your actual server(s) IP addresses should already be whitelisted so it will not affect your internal mail routing. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS SCANNING UPDATE

2007-04-16 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Fwiw it worked for us. .. Original Message ... On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:11:57 -0400 Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I attempted to install this update on my server. The package is apparently missing a DLL. The decludeproc service would not start, and the pop-up said to contact

[Declude.JunkMail] Bounce / Spoof Analysis Help Please

2007-03-16 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We're seeing bounce messages similar to the following. I don't think our server has been compromised, but I want to be sure. We legitimately send mail from 208.100.26.91, but I think (hope) its appearance in the following is spoofed.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce / Spoof Analysis Help Please

2007-03-16 Thread Robert Grosshandler
to be breaking down your door and making you eat this spam. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 7:39 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Bounce / Spoof

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist weirdness

2007-03-08 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We're getting certain e-mails whitelisted, and I'm not able to find where we've done that to ourselves. Here's a line from a whitelist entry I CAN find: Skipping3 E-mail from IP 208.100.26.91; whitelisted [208.100.26.91] Here's a line from the whitelist entry I CANNOT find: Skipping4

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.2

2007-02-12 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We’re using it, no observed problems. Latest Declude / Sniffer / Imail 2006.2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:03 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.2 Has

[Declude.JunkMail] New Version - AVG?

2006-12-21 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi all -- Recently, there was discussion of an issue with AVG. Is that addressed in today's release? Thanks, Rob = Robert Grosshandler iGive.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type

[Declude.JunkMail] No More Broken Headers

2006-12-08 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Congrats to all. Finally. Rob --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off

2006-12-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
: Robert Grosshandler mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:55 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off Hi Declude is working wonderfully, too wonderfully. It is scanning e-mail we're sending out from our server, and we

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off

2006-12-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off That would turn off virus scanning, but not junkmail scanning. Darin. - Original Message - From: Robert Grosshandler mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday

[Declude.JunkMail] Turning outbound scanning off

2006-12-06 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi Declude is working wonderfully, too wonderfully. It is scanning e-mail we're sending out from our server, and we don't want it to do that, since it adds headers and stuff that have no purpose, and might actually cause filter issues on the receiving end. We don't need it to do outbound virus

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Robert Grosshandler
from whatever the CA db mirroring application is. Hope that helps. Rob Robert Grosshandler --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] declude not modifying subject line

2006-11-08 Thread Robert Grosshandler
David -- The problem exists in Interceptor, as well, so a fix from Ipswitch or Smartermail isn't going to solve all of the problems, unfortunately. If it helps at all, every message that is malformed this way is bad, spam scores off the charts. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Backup MX

2006-11-02 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi all -- What is the current best practice for handling backup MXs? It appears to have gotten harder since the bots seem to target the lower priority MXs. It seems that the lower priority MX accepts the mail, and then passes it along to us, but since there isn't the same filtering going on

[Declude.JunkMail] Test - ignore

2006-10-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Test, please ignore. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] Test - ignore

2006-10-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Sorry for the multiple tests, please ignore. Rob --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] test - ignore

2006-10-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
test - ignore ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] Test - ignore

2006-10-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Test --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer vs. Commtouch

2006-10-03 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi All - We've been very happy users of Sniffer for several years, but now that Declude is including the Commtouch solution, we need to consider it. Any thoughts, comparisons, suggestions? We're a very small shop, if that matters. We're not an ISP, so the licensing weirdness doesn't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi We're not a service provider (but I love and value the fact that all of you are!) Rob What I find particularly amusing is the line Restrictions apply to service providers. If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. ---

[Declude.JunkMail] I Must Be Blind

2006-07-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
1) Commtouch offering - I got to My Account, and I don't see anything to give me a hint on pricing. Pointer requested! 2) Is this service competitive or complementary to Message Sniffer? Thanks, Rob --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] I Must Be Blind

2006-07-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
, and Log Parsers. Robert Grosshandler writes: 1) Commtouch offering - I got to My Account, and I don't see anything to give me a hint on pricing. Pointer requested! 2) Is this service competitive or complementary to Message Sniffer? Thanks, Rob --- This E-mail came from

[Declude.JunkMail] Blackberry Issues - blank bodies

2006-06-30 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Folks - Once in awhile, we (really,me) get e-mails from folks using Blackberrys. The body is blank. I'm trying to track down the cause. We're using Imail 8.22 all patches applied. Latest version of Declude. The same e-mail, going through a different e-mail server (not Imail / Declude) goes

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Poor man's high reliability?

2006-05-19 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Another option to consider ... www.ultradns.com has a service that does this. I've never priced it, so it may be pricey. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emails not be scanned by Declude

2006-04-25 Thread Robert Grosshandler
This has been a problem with Declude for a while now, and so far, their attempts to fix have not borne any fruit. They are painfully aware. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 8:54 AM To:

[Declude.JunkMail] 3.06

2006-02-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
I haven't received notification of 3.06. Did others receive a notice that it was available? Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Filter

2006-02-10 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Title: Message Would you be so kind as to post this filter? Thanks ahead of time Rob From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 8:33 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Filter FYI

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Filter

2006-02-10 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Title: Message You the Man! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent: Friday, February 10, 2006 11:39 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Combo Filter Here you go TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS BYPASS # Did it Fail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Logged spam getting to mailbox

2006-01-24 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Title: Logged spam getting to mailbox Current version does not fix this "folding" problem. Declude is testing a newer version that may fix the problem, but no joy yet. Mattwrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:34 PMTo:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain Keys?

2006-01-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Ditto. We'd love to be able to do this. In the interim, we've actually had success getting on Yahoo's good side by contacting them. We used the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get the process started. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Check out www.onebox.com (virtual receptionist). Combine it with vonage. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:23 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
does it cost? -d - Original Message - From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:36 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP Check out www.onebox.com (virtual receptionist). Combine it with vonage. Rob

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Headers showing up in the body on 3.05.10

2005-10-25 Thread Robert Grosshandler
in the Declude generated headers in order to handle Blank Folding. IMO, Declude should just throw the headers just before the location of the first CRLFCRLF or possibly following a mistaken LFLF. I haven't seen any Declude headers in the body using 2.0.6.16 and earlier. Matt Robert Grosshandler

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Other Problem not fixed 3.0.5.5

2005-09-30 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Yup, plus logs, etc. Putting it out here in case anybody else is seeing same thing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 7:33 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Other

[Declude.JunkMail] Other Problem not fixed 3.0.5.5

2005-09-29 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi The problem of the routeto happening before the subject line has been altered still exists in this newest version. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Other Problem not fixed 3.0.5.5

2005-09-29 Thread Robert Grosshandler
No changes to the configs from prior versions. It only mangles one in 100, and only for e-mails that trigger lots of tests. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:02 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Anyone have any outstanding issues with the 3.0.5 release?

2005-09-26 Thread Robert Grosshandler
I have one outstanding issue -- not stability related. We're seeing some messages that exceed our hold or delete weights get routed to our hold or delete folders without having their subjects altered (we prepend "spam" to the subject line). They route ok. It does look like maybe the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Anyone have any outstanding issues with the 3.0.5 release?

2005-09-26 Thread Robert Grosshandler
They've got logs from me, lots of logs! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 7:26 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Anyone have any outstanding issues with the 3.0.5 release?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

2005-09-22 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Are these the suggested defaults? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 10:41 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Beta 3.0.4.4 Posted

[Declude.JunkMail] Just upgraded to Declude 3 / Imail 8.2 - Config question

2005-09-09 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi Are there any spam or virus tests that belong in Imail, rather than letting Declude JM or AV handle it? I use Declude Pro / Sniffer / Inviurbl / 2 AV scanners. For instance, the tarpitting that Imail can do looks like a good thing. Thanks, Rob www.iGive.com --- [This E-mail scanned for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS and HELOBOGUS coming up a lot

2005-08-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi You are using both Sniffer and the Invariant Systems URI tests together? Maybe I was even denser than I thought, but I thought they sort of duplicated each other. Thanks, Rob snip on We have learned over the past year, that most of the built-in tests of Declude are not effective like

[Declude.JunkMail] Strategy or configuration help Needed - A little OT maybe

2005-06-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi all - Turned on a backup mail server as my main server (imail 8.15 hf2) was acting flakey. Main server has a wonderful combination of declude pro jm and av + sniffer. The backup server may not matter in this problem, but it's also Imail 8.l5 HF2. No declude or anything else running on it.

[Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
The following e-mail got tagged as spam, even though it was from an authenticated send. First, the imail log: 20050518 115243 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde) [64.4.213.172] connect 184.122.4.102 port 2528 (this is a remote user)20050518 115243 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (72db5d54010e1dde)

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Should have been whitelisted

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
aha, I thought smtp auth trumped all. Makes sense. Is there a way to add negative weight to smtp auth ? Thanks!! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy SchmidtSent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 3:32 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Fwiw, it's the management of WT that's buying it out/back. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be

[Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Ok -- time for the question again. Thumbs up or down on the declude / smartermail integration? Comments appreciated. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.20 / Webtrends

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
OT -- What are you moving your webtrends install to?? Do you use multiple servers? Thanks, Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Why didn't you point your CF server at smartermail? And, if I'm trying to reduce the new systems and learning curves, can I keep Declude Virus and Junkmail going? Thanks for the input. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Legit emails blocked

2005-02-02 Thread Robert Grosshandler
There was discussion of this on a non-technical list I subscribe to. It appears to be a true report. Blocking all IPs in the name of stopping spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:13 AM

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Earthlink spamblocker challenge / response

2004-07-14 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Can anybody point me to an Earthlink resource that is similar to AOL's Postmaster.aol.com? I'm trying to avoid the spamblocker challenge/response stuff that Earthlink uses, for our opt-in lists. AOL is doing a reasonable job at helping us get mail through, so I wonder if there is something

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Whitelisting of Individual E-Mail Addresses

2004-04-15 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Title: Message John is going to suggest Autowhite. He's biased, it's his product. We're a customer, we're not biased grin. It's great. Rob

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org - Scott?

2004-04-13 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi Scott - Since there does seem to be demand, and since you've indicated that you'll consider this test, perhaps you can give us an estimate of when we might see you integrate it? I'm sure you have nothing else to do: the integration of your new web site is done, you've new ownership and

[Declude.JunkMail] Invalid Whitelist Type: Anywhere

2004-04-06 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Getting this error message in logs. Didn't see it last week. It was in the last interim I was running, and it is in 1.79 beta. Don't find a reference to it in the archives. Don't recall making any change to global.cfg recently. Here's a log snippet (logging set to debug): 04/06/2004

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Invalid Whitelist Type: Anywhere

2004-04-06 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Big Duh!!! Slapped my wrist, sorry for the dumb question. Rob Rob, check your spelling of ANYWHERE there is a typo in it. Andrew 8) --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com

2004-02-24 Thread Robert Grosshandler
No problems here. I use it, not extensively. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT Plaxo.com Any one have any comments

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF - Question

2004-02-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
From another list I get: Quote ON ...we now have seven return codes, up from the previous four, and the Received-SPF field is now more structured. The total number of domains covered by SPF is actually much, much higher than 7000. That number comes from self-reporting. The true number is

[Declude.JunkMail] 1.78 beta possible bug

2004-02-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Built a filter: SUBJECT -30 CONTAINS tunafish Doesn't trigger. BODY -30 CONTAINS tunafish Triggers fine. It could very well be me, but if so, I'm stumped as to why. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.78 beta possible bug - NOT

2004-02-18 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Sorry for false alarm, but I couldn't recreate this myself. Working now. Rob === Built a filter: SUBJECT -30 CONTAINS tunafish Doesn't trigger. BODY -30 CONTAINS tunafish Triggers fine. It could very well be me, but if so, I'm stumped as to why. Rob ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multiple Declude Instances - i28

2004-02-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Appears to be fixed. Thanks, as always. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multiple Declude Instances - i28 Probably shouldn't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Lates Global.cfg file

2004-02-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Scott, have you ever considered putting a last edited date in the stock global.cfg? Also, possibly a change notes / revision history section someplace in the top of the stock global.cfg? Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
a reverse dns. Just whitelisting 'befree.com' doesn't work well, because there is a lot of spam that contains that phrase. Thoughts welcomed. I know there is something easy to set up, but I'm blanking at the moment. Thanks ahead of time. Rob Robert Grosshandler

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist strategy needed

2004-01-17 Thread Robert Grosshandler
I can't tell if they actually control that IP. If they did, I guess I could. -- -Would adding 66.207.130.10 into your host antispam trusted ip addresses work? ~Rick Due to the nature of our business (online retail), we get some e-mail that triggers most content driven spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist help

2004-01-14 Thread Robert Grosshandler
their messages. Matt Robert Grosshandler wrote: Hi I have Whitelist revdns .befree.com in my global.cfg. The following e-mail didn't get whitelisted. When I check out the reverse on it, I find that it is pg1bms00.bfast.com So, if I add Whitelist revdns .bfast.com I should be in better shape. Am I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] November 2003 Spam Statistics

2003-12-05 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Brian wrote - The new test platforms will allow us to move some domains out of the normal loop and we will be able to update the Declude version again (shortly we hope). For those of us who use the Declude version of Alligate (alongside Sniffer) we hope that's soon! It is great having two

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't work for me me

2003-12-05 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Negative weights on last hop only? How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail server)? Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

[Declude.JunkMail] AOL Slow ?

2003-12-03 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hiya All - We're seeing outbound e-mail to AOL.com happening very, very slowly. Our outbound server (64.4.213.165 / 64.4.213.169) appears to be configured correctly (no problems last week, and no changes since then). Anybody else seeing AOL delays today? = Rob

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: FireWall VPN Opinion

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We use Sonicwall, we're happy. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter multiple CCs?

2003-10-29 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Title: Message If an e-mail is sent to me, BCC'd to 5 other people in my domain, and BCC'd to 100 other people not in my domain, what number does BCC see? 5 or 100? Thanks. Rob

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: google.com not returning correctly

2003-10-09 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Todd Holt wrote: I have a customer that has 2 computers behind a d-link router implementing NAT. One computer works fine and can goto www.google.com just fine. The other computer, however, cannot. This can be caused by a virus modifying the HOSTS file, and adding an entry for google, etc.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniifer

2003-10-09 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We use both. We're happy with both. If both say e-mail is spam, it's spam. Sniffer is updated many times per day, the update is triggered via an e-mail. We use Declude's weighting, so Sniffer plus lots of different test failures equals spam. Alligate plus lots of different test failures equals

[Declude.JunkMail] Obvious spam not failing my tests, suggestions?

2003-10-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi The following headers tell the story. Anything I should be adding to add weight to this? It didn't trigger Sniffer or Alligate, but that's a different issue. The mailbox it was sent to was harvested from usenet, fwiw. Thanks, Rob Received: from standby2.xtra.co.nz [210.86.15.58] by

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Obvious spam not failing my tests, suggestions?

2003-10-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Karen said: Buy a good AV scanner. And I replied: We use Frisk on the server, Norton on the desktop, neither flagged it. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Obvious spam not failing my tests, suggestions? suggestions?

2003-10-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
John provided a great filter, since fprot and Norton didn't see the probably corrupt virus. Thanks. Rob --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound test

2003-10-02 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Here's the conclusion to this, I think. Alligate puts in headers in both incoming and outgoing email. Declude runs tests, then ignores results, if whitelist is triggered. So, I added some whitelist entries to Alligate, so it no longer tests the email outgoing from my IPs. Headers still get

[Declude.JunkMail] Backup MX / Spam

2003-10-02 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Hi Some large percentage of the spam we get comes to the backup MX and then is relayed to the primary MX. Using Declude JM Standard, is there some test I can use to add additional weight to any mail routed through my backup MX? Thanks, Rob == Robert N.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Backup MX / Spam

2003-10-02 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We do that already and it works fine. However, I know that there is a much higher probability that any mail that passes through the backup MX is spam, so I want to add additional weight just because it comes through the backup MX. Rob Jeff wrote: Use the IPBYPASS %sec mx ip% feature within the

  1   2   >