RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail

2010-09-13 Thread Robert Shubert
When I made the switch over to SM I had several accounts with abc-xyz@ that didn't work. We solved the problem by creating a aliases named abc-xyz@ that mapped to abc+...@. I understand that you have many of these type accounts to handle, but it could be done with a large alias file (that you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

2007-01-30 Thread Robert Shubert
I’m running a server on the side of ~175 domains and 1000+ users. Spanning from domains with nothing but aliases to aol.com to 400 webmail users looking for outlook-like collaborative features. I started migration from Imail 8.22 + declude to SM 4.0 a week ago (and will finish this coming

[Declude.JunkMail] compatibility question

2006-06-19 Thread Robert Shubert
Sorry if this is waste of time, but I want to be absolutely sure before I do anything to my server. Is Declude 4.2 fully compatible with iMail 8.22? Thanks, Robert ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?

2005-11-29 Thread Robert Shubert
So now I guess the big question is if Declude 3.0.5.20 is compatible with and ready for Imail 2006. Is there any official word on support? Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility

2005-10-17 Thread Robert Shubert
I didn't even think this was possible. Does anyone know of a command line utility that does this? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Rapaport Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:30 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05

2005-09-27 Thread Robert Shubert
Does this dual-processor issue affect system with HT (turned on)? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-07-20 Thread Robert Shubert
I too have a serious issue with Declude remaining stable on my system. Ive tried each of the 2.0.6.x betas as they came out, but the problem hasnt gone away. I did have the mentioned SMTPd memory/crash issue when I originally went to 8.2, but with HF2 installed, that as gone away. My

[Declude.JunkMail] which DNS server?

2005-03-01 Thread Robert Shubert
I just want to dbl check that declude uses the NS server specified in the network interface properties box, and not the one in the iMail SMTP panel, yes? Can I explicitly set a NS sever for declude in the config? Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?

2004-05-22 Thread Robert Shubert
to the servers that aren't functioning properly? This is one of the reasons why I turned this off at least. Matt Robert Shubert wrote: Incidentally, Hotmail - as of a few day ago - does acknowledge theproblem and said they are working on it. I had to tell my server toretry for a day before I

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?

2004-05-21 Thread Robert Shubert
Incidentally, Hotmail - as of a few day ago - does acknowledge the problem and said they are working on it. I had to tell my server to retry for a day before I could start sending to hotmail again. R -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[Declude.JunkMail] ALERT BOUNCE

2004-04-17 Thread Robert Shubert
I'm having trouble getting ALERT and BOUNCE to work on 1.79 beta. Are there any known issues? In both cases nothing gets sent back and the email gets delivered normally. Thanks, Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT BOUNCE

2004-04-17 Thread Robert Shubert
Thanks. ALERT did actually do its job, it just took a while to get the message back. And I see the new name for bounce. I'm hoping to use either action in a narrow weight range (10-14) since this is where most of my false-positives end up. Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Disable outgoing scanning

2004-03-22 Thread Robert Shubert
Sorry for asking for specifics, could you clarify the minimum versions of both software products for this function to work. Also, this command isn't in the manual, likely because it's still beta, but considering I read it thoroughly before I emailed the list, you might want to add a beta section

[Declude.JunkMail] message-id header

2004-02-09 Thread Robert Shubert
I got this: Code: 8000800e. The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test. This E-mail has a bogus Message-ID: header. From the online tool (and that code). I was wondering what constitutes a good Message-ID? Is there a site (RFC?) or other description of what these things should look

[Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT

2004-02-04 Thread Robert Shubert
I recently turned on the IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT filters to see how they work. They seem to do more harm than good, for instance I weight 10 SPAMCOP since that service works well for me, but these filters lowered the weight so that spamcop (only) spams get through. I do understand that they

[Declude.JunkMail] imail calendar is spam?

2003-03-17 Thread Robert Shubert
in the header. I'm emailing this to both declude and Imail hoping that the two parties can work out a solution. Thanks, Robert Shubert Tronics --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request

2002-09-17 Thread Robert Shubert
Rick, I too am planning to advance Declude administration to my users via a web application. Although I saw no reason why I couldn't programmaticaly change the global.cfg and other files. Could I ask your reasoning? Also, to what level of modification do you anticipate. The numerous options