RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail
When I made the switch over to SM I had several accounts with abc-xyz@ that didn't work. We solved the problem by creating a aliases named abc-xyz@ that mapped to abc+...@. I understand that you have many of these type accounts to handle, but it could be done with a large alias file (that you should be able to create automatically with a script). Robert From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Robert Grosshandler Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 3:17 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail vs. Smartermail Hi All - We're currently using Imail v2006. We had no need to upgrade and the iMail versions until this year didn't support some features we needed (primariy DomainKey / DKIM signing of outbound mail. ) We'd considered moving to Smartermail, but it didn't (and doesn't) support a feature we needed (blah-x...@igive.com) formatting of incoming mail. Smartermail does (blah+x...@igive.com) and we'd have to get 250,000 folks to change the e-mail address we assigned them. Pricing between the two for our needs is almost the same (Smartermail would be slightly cheaper in the long run). I know that people left iMail in droves over the past several years. Any current info on Ipswitch that should make me go through the pain of a switch to Smartermail? Thanks ahead of time. Rob --- [This E-mail was checked by Declude] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned by Declude] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences
Im running a server on the side of ~175 domains and 1000+ users. Spanning from domains with nothing but aliases to aol.com to 400 webmail users looking for outlook-like collaborative features. I started migration from Imail 8.22 + declude to SM 4.0 a week ago (and will finish this coming weekend). Im migrating in batches every other night and support calls the day after are approximately 10% of the customers moved. At least ½ of them are due to something dumb. Unfortunately the list of differences between the two software packages (and things that SM doesnt do) does get a little long if you get picky. (eg. Imail can take #$%: in place of @, whereas SM can only take %/). But I really want to emphasize that in the areas where SM does shine (eg. resource usage, admin reports, web interface, support, bang-for-buck) it really shines brightly. I am hopeful that the limitations of SM4 will quickly disappear over the next few months. Keep in mind that if you need to serve a lot of Mac webmail users or require SSL support on your protocols, you might want to wait it out some, those areas are the biggest faults at the moment. Best, Robert _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Green dfn Systems Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 10:59 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences Thanks Herb and Kevin! I had missed 2 different ways of doing it. I guess I need to RTMA (Read the Manual Again) Herb Wrote: That is not correct. Here is the info from the help in version 3.x. Smartermail will do what you want, require those from non known ip addresses or ranges to have to authenticate and other not to have to. Kevin Wrote: Not true you can allow IP addresses to send unauthenticated. We do it. Security - SMPT Authentication Bypass --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] compatibility question
Sorry if this is waste of time, but I want to be absolutely sure before I do anything to my server. Is Declude 4.2 fully compatible with iMail 8.22? Thanks, Robert ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] is it ready?
So now I guess the big question is if Declude 3.0.5.20 is compatible with and ready for Imail 2006. Is there any official word on support? Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility
I didn't even think this was possible. Does anyone know of a command line utility that does this? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Rapaport Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 12:30 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: iMail password utility At 08:53 AM 10/17/2005, you wrote: IPlus Info Browser by Martekware? http://www.martekware.com I think that was it, but so far I can't find it (had it on an server that I subsequently upgraded) I use http://croftssoftware.com/downloads/Decode_IMail_Users_Password_Setup.exe Well that will do the trick. Thanks everyone! --- htmlfont size=1[This E-mail a href=http://www.cayugacomputers.com/ccvds.html;scanned for viruses/a 10/17/2005 12:30:12]/font/html --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05
Does this dual-processor issue affect system with HT (turned on)? Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:43 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.05 David, Are you running a dual proc box - you did not say exactly? If you are let me know and I can help you verify if you are having the same dual proc issue I see. Darrell David Lewis-Waller writes: I didn't take part in the beta of v3 but upgraded yesterday from 1.8x. However, I do notice a considerable CPU usage penalty some 100% more usage than in the previous version and commonly long queues in \proc waiting to be serviced. I have also seen a couple of emails from users with dual procesor boxes having issues. Is this what others are seeing? David --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update
I too have a serious issue with Declude remaining stable on my system. Ive tried each of the 2.0.6.x betas as they came out, but the problem hasnt gone away. I did have the mentioned SMTPd memory/crash issue when I originally went to 8.2, but with HF2 installed, that as gone away. My server runs an average of 70 mail/min with a peak of about 200. My question is: what version of declude should I rollback to? Ill gladly give up features as long as I have the stability, when declude crashes (and puts up a dialog, which I have to clear) no mail is delivered. Thanks for any help, Robert From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing Lists Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:30 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Bill, does that mean days, weeks, months? I dont know if you are aware but we reported this many many months ago, before 2.0.6 was released. We have a real problem with customers trying to explain that we cannot guarantee mail delivery because of Declude. So customers will rightfully ask for a timeframe and we wont install new installs until we know this is fixed. But a timeframe is required since it has taken so long to acknowledge and address. Sal - Original Message - From: Bill Billman To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 9:29 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Hi Darin, We expect to be testing in a few high volume production environments in the very near future. If all goes well we will offer a general beta shortly after that. We intend to perform a thorough QA cycle and will not release until we are satisfied this version meets or exceeds expectations. Thanks, Bill Billman Declude From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:52 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Hi Bill, Do you have a target release date? Thanks, Darin. - Original Message - From: Bill Billman To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:31 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Thanks Sal. I agree. Orphaned emails are unacceptable and the issue is indeed being addressed. Quality, stability, and performance are the goals for this release and that is what we will deliver. We spent a fair amount of time analyzing the issues and designing our solutions. I believe it was time well spent and I thank all our customers for their patients. So far we are very pleased with the results from our tests. Bill Billman Declude From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing Lists Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:23 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Also I hope the issue of orphaned emails is being addressed with Declude and SM. This is a real pain, we had to go to back to Declude 2.0.5.76 because 2.0.6 release would break up the hdr and eml files (so you would get orphaned hdr in the /proc and .eml in the spool). 2.0.5.76 doesnt check for emails forgotten by declude so we check the /proc directory with a script. Obviosuly this is not the best way to run a mail server. I believe we worked with Ralph on this issue for several months, but no solution yet. Sal - Original Message - From: Bill Billman To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:52 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Thanks Mike. We are making great progress. Weve managed to address the issues and make Declude far more efficient. Internal testing is beginning. I believe that you will be pleased with the performance and resource utilization of this version. Too early for me to make specific claims but Im very optimistic from a stability and performance perspective. Bill Billman Declude From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:47 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Any new news on this issue? Basically, version 2.X is useless to me. If there is any way I can assist by sending debug info, lmk. --Mike TNWEB From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Billman Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 15:24 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update Youre spot on Mike. In cases like this it comes down to finding the circumstances that trigger the problem and then simulating those
[Declude.JunkMail] which DNS server?
I just want to dbl check that declude uses the NS server specified in the network interface properties box, and not the one in the iMail SMTP panel, yes? Can I explicitly set a NS sever for declude in the config? Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?
Title: Message Exactly what I had to do. I was skipping for 2 hours on failure, caching dns info, and doing 20 retries on 30 min intervals. Hotmail wasnt getting anything from me. I switched back to letting my DNS server do the work (never really saw any benefit anyway), turned off the skip on failure feature (also didnt make much of a difference except to make my log files a little bigger) and increased my retry to 24 times at one hour intervals. That immediately fixed the problem. I actually think things are running a little better this way, likely because the extra effort the server does with dns is offset by my longer retry interval. And I give mail a bigger chance to get delivered to a problematic (or recently changed) mail server. Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 3:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail? I also turned off Failed Domain Skipping for the same reasons, but I don't believe that I had any issues besides temporary delays causing confusion when helping clients get their servers back online after failures. I figure that with all the processing power that goes into spam and virus blocking, caching and failed domain skipping aren't but 0.1% of the utilization and it's likely safer to turn them off. Who knows. Matt Colbeck, Andrew wrote: Interestingly enough, cacheing isn't the problem on our IMail side. Microsoft has not removed the unresponsive hosts from their MX records despite the problem persisting over a week and thosehosts never responding. IfMicrosoft had changed their DNS, cacheing would be an issue. Also, MSN addresees would have the same queuing problem. The MX records for the MSN domain(s) point to the Hotmail servers. Since the problem was particularly bad for us, we've put the dummy zone back in our mail server's local DNS, with the 12,correction, 9out of 16 hosts that do respond to us. And no, I won't share which 9 hosts with the mailing list, as I'm sure your subset of hotmail servers would be different from mine, and these messages are archived on the web for future admins to stumble over. If you really need to do this too, look at the mail hosts and spend some time searching for those IP addresses in your sys0521.txt log, but don't forget to check later and remove your dummy zone when Hotmail returns to normal service. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail? I turned off IMail's internal DNS caching in order to avoid situations like this. I don't host that many local accounts, but I haven't seen any build-ups in my spool either time that Hotmail has had issues. My thought is that maybe you cached records in IMail that corespond to the servers that aren't functioning properly? This is one of the reasons why I turned this off at least. Matt Robert Shubert wrote: Incidentally, Hotmail - as of a few day ago - does acknowledge theproblem and said they are working on it. I had to tell my server toretry for a day before I could start sending to hotmail again.R-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colbeck, AndrewSent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:40 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?I'm seeing 2 things:My default Imail queuing numbers gave too much emphasis on retry threadsandfrequency. I've lowered them.The same 1/4 of the Hotmail MX hosts are still down this week. Istuffedthe responsive ones into my cacheing DNS server in a hotmail.com zoneandthat alleviated the queue. The next day I checked my Imail log, becauseIwanted to get rid of that hotmail.com workaround before it bit me, and Ifound that the remaining 3/4 of the servers still regularly told myserverto come back later, refused connection, or dropped the connection.Andrew 8)-Original Message-From: David Lewis-Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:52 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?This looks like it's an ongoing, long term issue. DNReports MXconnectionproblems.http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=hotmail.com -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rick DavidsonSent: 11 May 2004 20:29To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?Yep hotmail is not accepting from us either, I am seeing connection resets from themRick DavidsonNational Systems ManagerNorth American Title Group-- Original Message -From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:44 PMSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail?
Incidentally, Hotmail - as of a few day ago - does acknowledge the problem and said they are working on it. I had to tell my server to retry for a day before I could start sending to hotmail again. R -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 12:40 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail? I'm seeing 2 things: My default Imail queuing numbers gave too much emphasis on retry threads and frequency. I've lowered them. The same 1/4 of the Hotmail MX hosts are still down this week. I stuffed the responsive ones into my cacheing DNS server in a hotmail.com zone and that alleviated the queue. The next day I checked my Imail log, because I wanted to get rid of that hotmail.com workaround before it bit me, and I found that the remaining 3/4 of the servers still regularly told my server to come back later, refused connection, or dropped the connection. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: David Lewis-Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail? This looks like it's an ongoing, long term issue. DNReports MX connection problems. http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=hotmail.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: 11 May 2004 20:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail? Yep hotmail is not accepting from us either, I am seeing connection resets from them Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:44 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hotmail not accept inbound mail? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] ALERT BOUNCE
I'm having trouble getting ALERT and BOUNCE to work on 1.79 beta. Are there any known issues? In both cases nothing gets sent back and the email gets delivered normally. Thanks, Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT BOUNCE
Thanks. ALERT did actually do its job, it just took a while to get the message back. And I see the new name for bounce. I'm hoping to use either action in a narrow weight range (10-14) since this is where most of my false-positives end up. Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 8:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ALERT BOUNCE I'm having trouble getting ALERT and BOUNCE to work on 1.79 beta. Are there any known issues? In both cases nothing gets sent back and the email gets delivered normally. The ALERT action should work as-is (although now that you mention it, it probably should be changed like the BOUNCE action). The BOUNCE action was renamed (see http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm for the new name), because it was being misused too often, and causing our customers to appear as spammers. If you wish to continue using it, you should read the information on it in the manual first. It is rarely appropriate to use the BOUNCE action (although there are some cases where it may make sense). -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Disable outgoing scanning
Sorry for asking for specifics, could you clarify the minimum versions of both software products for this function to work. Also, this command isn't in the manual, likely because it's still beta, but considering I read it thoroughly before I emailed the list, you might want to add a beta section to it. One other note along these lines, I like to update my config files from time to time, but new commands found only in newer versions of the software often show up in them. Is there a chart of Declude version vs. command? I don't update the version of Declude as often as the config files, or as the case is at the moment, I need to get an agreement but won't be able to afford it for a little while. Thanks Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 7:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Disable outgoing scanning Is it not possible (in anyway) for Declude to identify that an email came from an authenticated user? Yes. With the latest beta of Declude JunkMail and the latest version of IMail, you can add a line WHITELIST AUTH to the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file to automatically whitelist E-mail sent from authenticated users. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers since 2000. Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] message-id header
I got this: Code: 8000800e. The E-mail failed the BADHEADERS test. This E-mail has a bogus Message-ID: header. From the online tool (and that code). I was wondering what constitutes a good Message-ID? Is there a site (RFC?) or other description of what these things should look like? Thanks, Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT
I recently turned on the IPNOTINMX and NOLEGITCONTENT filters to see how they work. They seem to do more harm than good, for instance I weight 10 SPAMCOP since that service works well for me, but these filters lowered the weight so that spamcop (only) spams get through. I do understand that they solve an issue of server generated emails, one email that was getting marked as spam was a system report from a firewalled server, IP 10.1.1.something. This email is now not spam, as it shouldn't be, but I'm not sure about the tradeoff. Are other people using these filters successfully? Is it better to keep them with a low negative weight or disable them altogether and just rely on positive tests? Thanks for your input. Robert --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] imail calendar is spam?
I turned on the iMail Calendar for a client and they responded with an odd problem. If someone uses the calendar to invite someone else, there is evidently a javascript popup window that can come from the request email. This javascript then allows the user to click to respond. It's this response that Declude is catching as spam. Emails sent normally from the users machine do not fail spam tests, only when this javascript method is used. The header reports the failure of c8200204, or no From address, and therefore reports both SPAMHEADERS and BADHEADERS, which then hit my WEIGHT. Anyway, looking the header I have here, there is a From: line. But looking at the raw email on the server, the from line is this: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 28 10:21:17 2003 It seems the timestamp is appended to the From line for some reason. This is probably being seen as a corruption in the header. I'm emailing this to both declude and Imail hoping that the two parties can work out a solution. Thanks, Robert Shubert Tronics --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Request
Rick, I too am planning to advance Declude administration to my users via a web application. Although I saw no reason why I couldn't programmaticaly change the global.cfg and other files. Could I ask your reasoning? Also, to what level of modification do you anticipate. The numerous options that declude allows for will make 100% remote editing quite a challange. Thanks for your input. Bob Rick Davidson wrote: Howdy Scott, Was wondering if you would consider creating a separate whitelist file for management purposes. Currently I have one customer with 4 Imail servers peered as a single domain across the country (US :-) I maintain master black lists and word filters on my workstation and use a batch file to FTP them to each server. Also, we are developing some web based management tools for Declude and would rather not have to programmaticly access the global.cfg file. Figured I would ask :-) Have a great day! Rick Davidson Buckeye Internet Services www.buckeyeweb.com 440-953-1900 - --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
