Re: [Declude.JunkMail] First SpamCop SURBL bad entry

It seems like the people running SURBL have found it too, since edu.au now is in the whitelist of ccTLDs that never should be blocked. SURBL has changed the name of the rbldns zone file by adding a d at the end, so the download URL is now http://www.surbl.org/sc.surbl.org.rbldnsd. The old name

[Declude.JunkMail] New script and filter

Hi, I have written a new command script that creates a filter which seems to be promising. The rationale behind this is two observations: most spam have several recipients and most spam is sent to invalid addresses. Our server rejects about 75% of all incoming messages for the latter reason.

[Declude.JunkMail] ALLRECIPS variable

Hi, Something just struck me. Wouldn't it be a good idea to have the individual addresses in the ALLRECIPS variable surrounded by angled brackets, if it is possible to do that? It only makes sense to use this variable with the CONTAINS filtertype, and by having such brackets we could easily

[Declude.JunkMail] Log analysis and test check scripts

Hi, My log analysis and test check scripts are available for download at: http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/LOG_analysis.zip http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/TEST_check.zip The first script creates a list with the number of hits for each test, number of messages that

[Declude.JunkMail] SURBL filter script 1.2

The SURBL filter script has been updated again and now includes: - a maxweight variable that sets both MAXWEIGHT and the weight of individual entries (so that filter processing stops at the first match) - an exclusion file where domains and ip addresses that should be excluded from the filter

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script

Matt, Thanks for the suggestions. With a maxweight variable it would also make sense to add a body weight variable (so that this weight easily can be set to a value other than 0). At present, the processor load shouldn't be any problem, however, since the number of entries is rather few. This

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script

I will update the script so that it can handle both maxweight and an optional exclude file. I don't think that a variable for setting the weight of rows/entries different from the maxweight is necessary, since the purpose is to stop processing at a match, so the maxweight option would set the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script

-- -- Roger Eriksson Botanical Institute, Göteborg University Box 461, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden Visiting/delivery address: Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22 B, SE 413 19 Göteborg, Sweden Phone: +46 31 7732666 Fax: +46 31 7732677 http://www2.botany.gu.se/staff/rogeri/welcome.html --- [This E-mail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL filter script

should update the file? Hourly, daily, ... Thank you Markus -- -- Roger Eriksson Botanical Institute, Göteborg University Box 461, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden Visiting/delivery address: Carl Skottsbergs Gata 22 B, SE 413 19 Göteborg, Sweden Phone: +46

[Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script

Hi, The SURBL filter script has been updated and should now run under both Windows NT 4 and Windows 2000. The updated script can be downloaded at http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/SURBL_filter.zip. Those of you that downloaded the previous version and use it on Windows 2000

[Declude.JunkMail] SURBL filter script

Hi, The command script that downloads the SURBL rbldns zone file, converts it to a body filter, and updates the existing filter file is available for download at http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/SURBL_filter.zip. I have included a short readme file and added comments to the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL filter script

Hi again, This version of the SURBL filter script only works under Windows 2000 and later. I will try to adjust the script so that it also can be used on Windows NT 4. /Roger Hi, The command script that downloads the SURBL rbldns zone file, converts it to a body filter, and updates the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org

However I hope to see SURBL soon as an additional Declude test. I just got caught up on this thread and checked out the website for SURBL and I agree! This would help with the stuff that passes all of the other tests. Sheldon Hi, SURBL is surprisingly effective, considering the fact that it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Surbl.org

OK, just give me some time to add comments to the scripts. I will post a download link tomorrow or so. /Roger If anyone is interested, I can make the SURBL script available for download (together with some other scripts, e.g., the log analysis and test check scripts that generated the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [IMail Forum] OT Verisign hijack *.net - crosspost

Scott, If I understand this correctly, the drawback with this work-around, compared with the MAILFROM test, is that it only looks up the A record and doesn't check for any MX records. Any idea if this will cause a number of false positives? /Roger Scott could yo explain how this works? Or,