RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Multiple Threat Lookup Database test for Declude JunkMail

2004-07-12 Thread Todd Holt
the industry and perhaps try out new ideas, that's how technology advances. But don't do it from an ivory tower! Scott has always been in the trenches with the rest of us. I would like to see the new management get a little dirty with us, too. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO !

2004-07-12 Thread Todd Holt
method: Notepad or XML object. Also, viewing an XML file in IE is very easy to pick out the data you want to view. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of decjunkmail Sent

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say NO !

2004-07-12 Thread Todd Holt
of the XML structure (parsing of regular expressions is very fast) provided by the MS XML object parser. MS has put a lot of effort into the efficiency of the XML object parser because they use it so often! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup Database test for Declude JunkMail

2004-07-09 Thread Todd Holt
into an otherwise smooth running product. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop

2004-05-12 Thread Todd Holt
(and its costs). 6. How pervasive the public feels the problem is. IMHO: The only thing that will stop spam is when enough lawmakers have enough spam sent to them to cause enough frustration! Then they will understand the problem. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Code for Palestine?

2004-05-10 Thread Todd Holt
Thats interesting I thought their country code would be more representative of Palenstine. Perhaps .ter for terrorists! ;) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Wildcards in sender blacklist

2004-04-29 Thread Todd Holt
I found some discussions of this last year and I wanted to see if anything had changed: Are wildcards supported in the sender blacklists? For example: @mail*.rapiddealsbyemail.com @mail*.emailcourrier.com @relay*.reunion.com @*xxx* Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Cosmic 419er lost in space

2004-04-16 Thread Todd Holt
I say let him pay for the transgressions of his brethren in Lagos! ;) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 1:20 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring

2004-03-30 Thread Todd Holt
Monster.com?? LOL -Just kidding. Can the PIX log to a syslog server? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:43 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: %RND_SUBJECTS (This worries me!)

2004-03-29 Thread Todd Holt
I also forgot to mention that I can't contact Adrian to arrange a whitelist (should any of our users need to send to his users) because my messages will be blacklisted. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [HOLD weight]RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: %RND_SUBJECTS (This worries me!)

2004-03-29 Thread Todd Holt
, but if it exists, the text of the entry is not reliable. This is why I suggest not giving the type of RDNS entry much credibility, but certainly check if the RDNS exists!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller

2004-03-25 Thread Todd Holt
$ people. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] test

2004-03-02 Thread Todd Holt
Pong... Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Madscientist Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] test ping

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] new dow and hour tests

2004-02-18 Thread Todd Holt
What would be a good use for these tests? Or what is the motivation behind there creation? I don't understand what kind of Spam would be caught with them. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How do they do it?

2004-02-05 Thread Todd Holt
I noticed something similar when I added a new user to an existing domain and within 24 hours that account had SPAM traffic. Junkmail was catching it, but I'm not sure how the spammers found the address that quickly. Is this similar to Joe's issue? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

2004-01-30 Thread Todd Holt
he'll probably use his AOL account to do his mailings (if they allow the volume) AOL will stop them from coming in, but not from going out!! AOL and Earthlink are 2 of the biggest SPAM sources we see. I wish they would practice what they preach! ;) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude

2004-01-28 Thread Todd Holt
of challenging the obvious good or obvious bad messages, then reducing the number of challenge messages to something less than 5% of the messages. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

2004-01-23 Thread Todd Holt
Title: Message I agree with this approach. It would separate the BETA users from the curious RELEASE users (who probably should wait for the release). Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

2004-01-22 Thread Todd Holt
1. Place negative weight tests first. 2. While testing effectiveness of a single test, place it first or turn off the stop processing flag for a period of time. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

2004-01-21 Thread Todd Holt
processing early on most messages. (Over 90% of our delete weight messages failed Sniffer and either BadHeaders or SpamCop) I would like to save the processing time if those push the weight into the delete range. I could make sure to place the negative weight tests first. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

2004-01-21 Thread Todd Holt
here repeatedly: A way to combine test failures into a single outcome. For example, a test called DefinitelyDelete defined as failed Sniffer and failed Spamcop and failed Badheaders. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

2004-01-21 Thread Todd Holt
, Routing, etc) only. Again, it may seem small, but limiting the necessary processing and network access in any way can add up. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail Evaluation

2004-01-20 Thread Todd Holt
Yes. Imail! Go with Declude, you won't be sorry. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spencer Salva Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:01

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does Diskeeper Help on an imail server

2004-01-14 Thread Todd Holt
this window and the impact to our customers is negligible. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Bohen Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does Diskeeper Help on an imail server

2004-01-14 Thread Todd Holt
with it. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K. Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
I have been looking for the syntax for this entry. Can you publish it? My understanding is that this will whitelist anyone that has authenticated for SMTP. Is that correct? Also, what is the entry to stop performing tests if the weight reaches a certain level? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
I found the whitelist auth in the archives. Sorry. I still want to know how to stop performing tests after a certain weight level. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.JunkMail] Test order

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
Are the tests performed in the order listed in the global.cfg? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
to correctly configure the order of the tests. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:55 AM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
John, Are you saying that small servers are not reliable?? :)) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Friday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
I'm just giving you a hard time, John. I appreciate your effort to collate some data on the subject. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF setup wizard output

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
missing something here? We only send mail from 1 IP address. Can I just specify that 1 address? I want to specify that all mail for this domain (Xidix.com) is sent from a single IP address (208.57.224.88). What am I missing in this picture? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF setup wizard output

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
It would appear that I could this single line in the zone file: v=spf1 ip4:208.57.224.88 -all and that would specify that all valid mail from the domain originates from this IP address. Is this correct? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF setup wizard output

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
OK, thanks. We have a hosted DNS and I'm getting the entries done now. I'll let you know. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

2003-12-17 Thread Todd Holt
? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

2003-12-17 Thread Todd Holt
In the meantime, why not relay your outbound mail through your ISP? Obviously you have never relayed your outbound mail through an ISP! If you had, you would not suggest that course of action. :) Currently, I have no problems. I hope that I can keep it this way! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

2003-12-17 Thread Todd Holt
Jason, I think I have been convinced to push this issue with MPower. First I hope that John's contact can help me out, but I will also forward the RFC to them. Thanks for the debate! :) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

2003-12-17 Thread Todd Holt
fingers at us little guys as the problem. How many spam have you received from an AOL account? I can only speak for myself, but none of those apply to me. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

2003-12-17 Thread Todd Holt
directions. It's a violation of our TOS to send spam and I want to stop it. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

2003-12-16 Thread Todd Holt
and Scott McNealy. And the MS bashers just fall in line. Lemmings. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:26

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RR.COM

2003-12-16 Thread Todd Holt
. Difficult thing to do!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

2003-12-16 Thread Todd Holt
players have a voice. This would probably mean that AOL, Earthlink, RR, Hotmail, etc would be on the governing counciland it would be interpreted to their greatest competitive advantageand nothing would have changed! /pessimistic rant Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RR.COM

2003-12-16 Thread Todd Holt
I truly think they do this to keep the smaller players looking bad to their customers. If you can't get mail to AOL, what kind of mail server are you running? Come to AOL where the mail always gets to AOL! Now that is monopolistic! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

2003-12-16 Thread Todd Holt
things that I would look for by hand, in the content, not the context. I think we need more out of the box thinking like this. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

2003-12-16 Thread Todd Holt
Not much comfort to those admins that are being blocked by AOL when their servers are setup correctly. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virginia Indicts Two Men On Spam Charges

2003-12-12 Thread Todd Holt
for help. They don't want to get into the political mess this could cause. Thanks to the work of Scott, I have a great tool for this battle. And thanks to everyone else here, I have a place to educate myself on how to fight this battle. Fight the good fight, people!!! Todd Holt Xidix

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virginia Indicts Two Men On Spam Charges

2003-12-11 Thread Todd Holt
I applaud there efforts, but... $2500 a piece will deter no one!!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarelli Sent: Thursday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virginia Indicts Two Men On Spam Charges

2003-12-11 Thread Todd Holt
of money or effort on a problem they see as a nuisance. /.02 Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Anderson Sent: Thursday, December 11

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Todd Holt
time minimizes the effectiveness. What am I missing here? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:36

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Todd Holt
That sounds reasonable. You wrote of a process to compile a whitelist (implemented as negative weight on a blacklist). Does this process walk to all of the includes and their include, etc. to create the whitelist file? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude virus hanging...

2003-12-04 Thread Todd Holt
?? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 virus1.cfg Description: Binary data

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Capital One

2003-11-21 Thread Todd Holt
ROFLOL! :) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nick Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What next?

2003-11-13 Thread Todd Holt
LOL! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: OE contacts to Outlook

2003-11-12 Thread Todd Holt
Does anyone have a process to move Outlook Express 6.0 contacts and messages to Outlook 2000? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incoming email being blacklisted when not in the blacklist file not in the blacklist file

2003-11-11 Thread Todd Holt
Is there any way to define it as ends with logic? Are there any wildcard chars available for this? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incoming email being blacklisted when not in the blacklist file not in the blacklist file

2003-11-11 Thread Todd Holt
). Are these statements correct? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
Can sender blacklists support wildcards? ie. @*.abcdef.com Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks Sent: Thursday, October 30

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
@abcdef.com will catch @.abcdef.com? It would seem to imply a wildcard between the @ and the rest of the domain name. Is that true? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
Thanks for the info. I think we will be upgrading to 8.x to take advantage of the wildcarded kill.lst. Thanks to everyone for their input. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Declude.JunkMail] JM log entry missing

2003-10-30 Thread Todd Holt
Using LogLevel=MID, should there be at least one entry for each message that is received (except IMail killed messages)? If not, what would be the conditions to cause no entry in the log file for a particular message? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: WinME not resolving DNS

2003-10-29 Thread Todd Holt
, but his machine will not resolve DNS. If I go to a web server that I know the address of, I can browse that site just fine. Does anyone know why it won't resolve DNS queries? Are there any specific configs I should check. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: WinME not resolving DNS

2003-10-29 Thread Todd Holt
Believe me, that is my first instinct also!! But I'm trying to do a favor for a good client and I don't want to insult him by telling him that his computer sucks! Even though it's the truth! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original

[Declude.JunkMail] Wildcard kill list entries

2003-10-27 Thread Todd Holt
Can the kill file contain wild card entries? For example: @*ps01.net Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

[Declude.JunkMail] Understanding Imail logs document

2003-10-14 Thread Todd Holt
A link to this was posted recently. Can someone please repost the link? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

[Declude.JunkMail] Understanding Imail, junkmail, virus logs

2003-10-14 Thread Todd Holt
understanding. Please comment on any incorrect statements. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, October

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Understanding Imail, junkmail, virus logs

2003-10-14 Thread Todd Holt
Thanks for the info. Your always a wealth of information! :) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, October 14

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

2003-10-12 Thread Todd Holt
Yes. Soil-tech.com is a local domain that we host and Tony is a valid user on that domain. It almost appears that Imail is seeing his OutlookExpress as a mail server, not a authenticated mail client. Any other suggestions? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: google.com not returning correctly

2003-10-09 Thread Todd Holt
Thank you to everyone that pointed me in the right direction. It was the Trojan.QHosts virus. The McAfee removal instructions took care of the problem. Thanks again for everyone's help. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniifer

2003-10-09 Thread Todd Holt
See http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/msg11972.html Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wesley M Sent: Thursday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MS Customer Assistance SPAM

2003-10-08 Thread Todd Holt
(not detect it to begin with). For the time it saves me in admin, I can generate much more than $300/yr in additional revenue using that saved time!! You really owe it to yourself to look at www.sortmonster.com/messagesniffer. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: google.com not returning correctly

2003-10-08 Thread Todd Holt
the same DNS servers through the same router. This problem also appears when trying to use www.altavista.com, but www.yahoo.com, www.lycos.com seem fine. Has anyone seen this before? Could this be a virus, spyware, etc? Thanks in advance for any help. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hurah!

2003-10-06 Thread Todd Holt
Don't worry, with the politics of the situation and the money to be made, it will return. Just wait. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Todd Holt
So they don't have to pay for all registrations? I don't understand this. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

2003-10-03 Thread Todd Holt
! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Some good info on the Verislime coup

2003-09-18 Thread Todd Holt
for not insuring his privacy? Tell me the lawyers won't have a field day with that. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler Sent: Thursday, September 18

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim release to detect wildcard DNS entries (aka VERISCAM)

2003-09-18 Thread Todd Holt
Where can I download the interim release? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries

2003-09-17 Thread Todd Holt
rate (IMHO) is too high as it will lump all of the SDSL connections in with the SPAM sources. Can this filter distinguish between ADSL and SDSL? If not, is this acceptable? Is the filter doing this? Are there any unique instructions for doing this? Any thoughts? Todd Holt Xidix

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries

2003-09-17 Thread Todd Holt
), but important false positives. I hope no one is deleting messages that contain points from this test. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky Sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Email addresses on a company webpage?

2003-09-15 Thread Todd Holt
With all this talk of email addresses on web pages... What is the best way to obfuscate them? HTML (how is this done?)? Java (how is this done?)? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A slight increase in spam not getting caught thanks to Network Solutions

2003-09-15 Thread Todd Holt
resolve to this range: 64.94.110.x??? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Anderson Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: National Do Not Call Registry

2003-06-27 Thread Todd Holt
. Combined with the golden rule of capitalism: He who has the gold makes the rules., results in what we have today. I think that the do not call list will result in a new call list worth $$MM. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com -Original Message- From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: The Titian Key Product to Remove Spam.. patent pending?

2003-06-06 Thread Todd Holt
But wait, theres more!!! If you order today, we will include absolutely freethe amazing Ginzu SPAM knife. It never needs sharpening and can slice the fat off your SPAM messages just as easy as that! It slicesit dicesit even makes julienne fries!! Blah, blah, blah Ginger

[Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient

2002-10-25 Thread Todd Holt
I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun to use the recipients email as the senders email. Can this be trapped by the current tests or should I request a new test to cover this? The only legitimate mail that would pass this test would be users sending mail to themselves and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient

2002-10-25 Thread Todd Holt
Have these people never heard of the sent items folder? I know people do this a lot, but it is not necessary (IMHO) and generates extra mail traffic. We have tried very hard to teach our people to use the sent items so we don't have a huge problem with marking these as spam. $.02 This method of

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for feedback

2002-10-23 Thread Todd Holt
LOL. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for feedback One of these days i'll take a typing class.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FromFile Usage Report- Image`fx

2002-10-21 Thread Todd Holt
What was used to create this report? Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner;declude.com]On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FromFile Usage Report- Image`fx Report ID Version

[Declude.JunkMail] DNSReport claims domain not supporting abuse account, but it does

2002-10-08 Thread Todd Holt
DNS Reports at: http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=xidix.com claims: WARNING: One or more of your mailservers does not accept mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailservers are expected by RFC2142 to accept mail to abuse. mail.speakeasy.net's abuse response: RCPT TO: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question

2002-07-31 Thread Todd Holt
Oops. My bad. I had the XSENDER commented out. I just uncommented it and set it to ON. I'll let you know in a little while when I get some junkmail. Thanks, Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz (by way of R. Scott Perry

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Oh gosh!

2002-07-28 Thread Todd Holt
Title: Message I should get a copy and SPAM them back!! They shouldn't be able to tell who is doing it! Then, if someone does get upset at me (because my SPAM was not anonymous), I can sue them for deceptive trade practices. :-) LOL Todd -Original Message-From: [EMAIL

RE: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO:Declude Console

2002-07-17 Thread Todd Holt
apps (very few) | won't open in GUI mode. | | Sorry for being out of scope. | | David | WiSS Limited | | -Original Message- | From: Todd Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: 16 July 2002 17:10 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: KITHRUP:RE

RE: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO:Declude Console

2002-07-16 Thread Todd Holt
of crashing - VNC doesn't. My $.02 _M | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Todd Holt | Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:10 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: KITHRUP:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELO:Declude Console | | | I am

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Too Much info?

2002-06-26 Thread Todd Holt
I found it interesting reading and appreciate the posts. I think these articles should be of interest to this forum as this is what we are here for. Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:05 AM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cooperative Kill List

2002-06-13 Thread Todd Holt
Title: Message If the procedure is to have each admin download the list regularly, then the responsibility for the validity of the list would be on the admin. This would not be any different than me telling everyone that a particular address (ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is a spamer. I think

[Declude.JunkMail] W32/Fretham-Fam stopped with Junkmail attachment filtering?

2002-06-12 Thread Todd Holt
Using Junkmail settings, we prohibit attachments with the extensions .exe,.com,.vbs,.pif,.scr,.bat,.cmd. Is this virus only spread by the .exe attachment and are we protected with those settings? (We also scan using f-Prot!) Todd --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The chicken or the egg...?

2002-05-29 Thread Todd Holt
It would seem more efficient to have the Junkmail filtered first, then only AV scan the good ones. But, does that leave a hole in the AV protection? Can you give us any scenerios in which you would recommend one over the other? Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] any way FYI

2002-05-29 Thread Todd Holt
Unfortunately, I had to stop trying to tell people because it took up so much time. And most had an email tone like this: (o|o) - Totally clueless! Didn't care! Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enhancements - unknown sender must reply to ack

2002-05-21 Thread Todd Holt
I have to agree that this could be one of the most powerful tools yet to fight SPAM. I would pay money for this even if it were a seperate product! A couple of questions about the implementation: 1- If the sender does not acknowledge the confirm request, do they go onto the blacklist? This

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Enhancements - unknown sender must reply to ack

2002-05-21 Thread Todd Holt
That would work very well for us! If the confirmation request comes back OK, could they be automatically added to the whitelist? Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] IMail kill.lst vs. Declude Blacklist

2002-05-21 Thread Todd Holt
1 - Do I have to restart SMTP after editing kill.lst? Declude doesn't appear to have this requirement. The Declude blacklist would seem easier to work with if the answer is yes. Does kill.lst allow comments like Declude blacklist? Which one is more efficient? Which one is more

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text

2002-05-20 Thread Todd Holt
We use the subject [SPAM] to indicate that the server thought it was SPAM. We found that this provokes more user thought than [SPAM??]. 1- [SPAM] indicates that some process has actually concluded something about the email and the user must act in order to correct the problem if it not SPAM (ie.

  1   2   >