BONDEDSENDERip4rquery.bondedsender.org
127.0.0.10-50
XBLip4rxbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.280
Am I missing something or why I can't find nearly zero positive results in
our logfile for this two tests?
I've running this tests now for 7
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IP4 Tests
BONDEDSENDER doesn't catch much, maybe 0.5% at best on my system, probably
more like 0.2% though.
I'm not getting anything on XBL, and I just found that the test entry
returned 127.0.0.4 instead of the 2 in my config. That's not that I read on
their site
: [Declude.JunkMail] IP4 Tests
Yes.
XBL integrates CBL now, and maybe more.
Matt
Kami Razvan wrote:
Matt:
Is CBL this: CBL:*:cbl.abuseat.org
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Bramble
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:01 AM
Just a quick follow up to this message. Today I removed DSBLMULTI after
two days of testing. Seemingly they consider lots of ISP mail servers
to be spam relays for inclusion in this list. I think I made the
mistake in adding them before...
DSBL is on the other hand very reliable IMO.
Matt
I see that the Global config file on Decludes website has an updated
list of IP4 tests and that the IP4 website also has a long list of IP4
tests.
My question... what are some of your IP4 tests that you use that you
find to be very effective?
Thanks,
Greg
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
I fail on a weight of 10, only score the last hop, and use the following
(see notes below, config updated yesterday for new weights and tests):
BONDEDSENDERip4rquery.bondedsender.org
127.0.0.10-50
AHBL-RELAYSip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org127.0.0.2
