Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-12-06 Thread Serge
they have good support ? - Original Message - From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sanford Whiteman declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:26 AM Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution Seriously, what's low? ...I ask because

Re[10]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-15 Thread Sanford Whiteman
There are some big differences between clustering and database mirroring... Yeaahhh... er... was that in question? The point of the e-mail you just responded to was you *do not* need more than one licensed copy of SQL Server to use database mirroring. The passive server does not

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Robert Grosshandler
SQL Database Mirroring is available in their Standard Edition, and I believe that in a Active / Passive architecture, only one license is required. We use it, but our needs are slight. I have a friend who uses it, and they've a very complex telephony app, and they've been happy. They migrated

Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Sanford Whiteman
SQL Database Mirroring is available in their Standard Edition, and I believe that in a Active / Passive architecture, only one license is required. Strange but true, from what I can see! This convo has stirred my interest in this thing, though I'll stick with the app-independent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Robert E. Spivack
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:26 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution I did get a price from Dell for 2 licenses to run a SQL cluster for an internet application. Got it in writing too

RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Robert E. Spivack
PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:21 PM To: Robert E. Spivack Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution An advantage of using Microsoft Database Mirroring

RE: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Robert E. Spivack
Technologies Group (408) 834-8560 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 6:01 PM To: Robert Grosshandler Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution SQL Database

Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Not correct. Database mirroring is supported in Std Edition, but you need two licenses. Hmm, the Hor$e's Mouth disagrees: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/passive-server-failover-support.mspx The third server, the witness server can be an XP OS and SQL Server 2005 Express (Free

RE: Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-14 Thread Robert E. Spivack
: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:43 PM To: Robert E. Spivack Subject: Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution Not correct. Database mirroring is supported in Std Edition, but you need two licenses. Hmm, the Hor$e's Mouth disagrees: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/passive-server-failover

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-13 Thread Robert E. Spivack
Technologies Group (408) 834-8560 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 4:27 PM To: Sanford Whiteman Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution Seriously

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-13 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 4:27 PM To: Sanford Whiteman Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution Seriously, what's "low"? ...I ask because clustering's ROI i

Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-13 Thread Sanford Whiteman
An advantage of using Microsoft Database Mirroring is that you can remain on a 100% Microsoft supported solution. Sure, but for the cost, you can have a full-time NSI engineer instead (who by necessity and experience knows their supported MS apps like the back of her/his

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I am looking for a low cost clustering sw/solution for our database server (Hyperfile C/S) Seriously, what's low? --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-12 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Seriously, what's low? ...I ask because clustering's ROI is kind of a hard target. Unfortunately, I almost always find it easier to justify clustering solutions for my clients *after* they haven't heeded an initial clustering suggestion and have had outages and/or data

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Clustering solution

2006-11-11 Thread Serge
I am looking for a low cost clustering sw/solution for our database server (Hyperfile C/S) TIA --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at