[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

2006-02-09 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Does anyone know if SmarterMail has Program aliases. I have checked the docs and am going back and forth with SmarterTools sales, but not to be found. It is the only missing feature I would need to move away from Imail. So now here is my declude question. Could I use smartermail/declude, with

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

2006-02-09 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
03:19 p.m. To: JunkMail Declude Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x Does anyone know if SmarterMail has Program aliases. I have checked the docs and am going back and forth with SmarterTools sales, but not to be found. It is the only missing feature I would need to move away from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

2006-02-09 Thread Matt
Kevin, I don't believe they introduced this, though they closed many gaps that they had in IMail equivalent functionality in this release, and changed a few other things that concerned me. For instance, they introduced sub-mailbox functionality, and they also gave us the ability to turn off

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

2006-02-09 Thread Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Jueves, 09 de Febrero de 2006 04:42 p.m.To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x Kevin,I don't believe they introduced this, though they closed many gaps that they had

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

2006-02-09 Thread Michael Thomas - Mathbox
and processes whatever it finds. Mike - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JunkMail Declude declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 3:19 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x Does anyone know if SmarterMail has Program aliases. I have

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.x

2006-02-09 Thread Matt Robertson
I'm looking at going back to Declude with the release of SM 3.0. First thing I saw on the Declude home page is something called a BOUNDRY LAYER Saw the same spelling error repeated on another graphic. I can't be the only guy to have noticed this, I would think. The signature graphic explaining