Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-11 Thread Dave Doherty
Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:58 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert Yes. SpamCheck log comes through: Got it. Same guy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-11 Thread Rick Klinge
at the ISP level? ~Rick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert U Has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-11 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert U Has anybody called in the FBI on this one? What he's doing HAS to be illegal in some major way if it's happening the way it appears. Spoofing an Amber Alert to harvest email addresses has

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-11 Thread Dave Doherty
IMO, this goes way beyond commercial spam. -d - Original Message - From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 12:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert Spam is Spam.. Do you think they really care

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert Yes. SpamCheck log comes through: Got it. Same guy

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-10 Thread Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: Now, if we could figure out all IPs used by this company... 64.62.150.0/24Azoogle/Zentyl Technologies (SBL8790, 5784, 5705, 5508, etc.) [64.62.150.0 - 64.62.150.255] - 12/26/2003 64.62.198.224/27Azoogle/Zentyl Technologies (SBL8790, 5784, 5705,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: Now, if we could figure out all IPs used by this company... 64.62.150.0/24Azoogle/Zentyl Technologies (SBL8790, 5784, 5705, 5508, etc.) [64.62.150.0 - 64.62.150.255] - 12/26/2003

[Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-09 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
How would you handle it if a know spammer domain sent out 250 community service Amber Alerts to users on you server? The WHITEFILTER3 lines found was Amber Alerts and AmberAlert in the HEADERS. X-RBL-Warning: MAILPOLICE-BULK: This E-mail came from bounceto.shysterbob.com, a potential spam source

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-09 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Hi John, HmmmInteresting question. I'm not inclined to handle it any differently than other email. If a spammer is sending out the Amber Alerts, how do you know it's legit? Even if I send out an Amber Alert how you know it's legit? Will the spammer in question adhere to honest

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert

2004-01-09 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
For those that are interested here is a site that has links to various states' Amber Alert plans. http://www.sexcriminals.com/amber-alert/ Sorry, my search did not yield a page with world-wide links. Back to John's question, I suppose it's easiest for me as an organization to help the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer sending a community service alert alert

2004-01-09 Thread Burzin Sumariwalla
Now that doesn't make any sense. Why would you sign up with a local provider and not your state or local law enforcement agency? It does seem like an effective, but extremely underhanded and immoral technique for harvesting addresses. More research to do... Burzin At 08:46 PM 1/9/2004, you