Matt,
Thanks for the suggestions.
With a maxweight variable it would also make sense to add a body
weight variable (so that this weight easily can be set to a value
other than 0). At present, the processor load shouldn't be any
problem, however, since the number of entries is rather few. This
As for the maxweight, perhaps someone can do it better, but this works for me:
In the variables ection add:
set V_Maxweight=20
In the code after if not %v_weight%== echo SKIPIFWEIGHT %v_weight%
surbl.filter.tmp
add:
if not %v_maxweight%== echo MAXWEIGHT %v_maxweight% surbl.filter.tmp
Scott
I will update the script so that it can handle both maxweight and an
optional exclude file.
I don't think that a variable for setting the weight of rows/entries
different from the maxweight is necessary, since the purpose is to
stop processing at a match, so the maxweight option would set the
I just tested this and the answer is that the processing will stop immediately.
/Roger
Scott, what will happen if all entries in a filter file have the
weight 0 and I use MAXWEIGHT 0? Will the processing stop immediately
or at the first match?
/Roger
--
Hi,
The SURBL filter script has been updated and should now run under
both Windows NT 4 and Windows 2000. The updated script can be
downloaded at
http://www.botany.gu.se/download/decludescript/SURBL_filter.zip.
Those of you that downloaded the previous version and use it on
Windows 2000
Roger, this version works on my NT4 machine like a champ. Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Eriksson
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script
Roger,
Thanks for the fine work. I finally got around to setting this up after
figuring out that it wasn't thousands of URL's long and my server seems
to be handling it well enough for now.
I have two suggestions for the script.
1) Add a MAXWEIGHT variable. If you score each line at say 4
