: Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] tricks for dealing with null senders?
Hi Royce-
Sounds like you've got a few things going on there. Understand, I'm on
version 8.05 now, so your mileage may vary. I'll
: [Declude.JunkMail] tricks for dealing with null senders?
Delete the nobody alias if it's present. That will let Imail reject
misaddressed messages before it processes them. This is way more
efficient,
and it should cut down on your processor and disk activity quite a lot.
What if nobody
do you have in your spool directory?
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: Royce Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:43 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] tricks for dealing with null senders?
Using Imail 6.05, and Declude 1.79 beta on NT4.0
] tricks for dealing with null senders?
Hi Dave,
thanks for the response.
I'm not sure of the mechanics of rejection, all I did to stop this for now
was to check the reject null senders box in smtp security. Please
understand that I'm just a guy who got stuck with this job, and 90
Message -
From: Royce Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] tricks for dealing with null senders?
Hi Dave,
thanks for the response.
I'm not sure of the mechanics of rejection, all I did to stop this for now
Using Imail 6.05, and Declude 1.79 beta on NT4.0
I've had a spate of crud flowing in the last week or so from
@variousaddresses addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which of course get turned
away as the addressee is unknown to my mail server. Unfortunately there
seems to be such a flood of the
in your spool directory?
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: Royce Burnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 3:43 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] tricks for dealing with null senders?
Using Imail 6.05, and Declude 1.79 beta on NT4.0
I've had
