RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
> >Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes? > > No. > > The only time quotes are required (or can be used properly) is in external > tests. What if there is a space in either the directory name or the file name? Spaces will not work in paths/filenames for files referenced in the Declud

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> >Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes? > > No. > > The only time quotes are required (or can be used properly) is in external > tests. What if there is a space in either the directory name or the file name? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.ese

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes? No. The only time quotes are required (or can be used properly) is in external tests. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. Declude Virus: Catche

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread Dan Geiser
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? Danny,   With my current setup the failure of SPAMDOMAINS adds 10 to the total weight of the message.  I chose 10 because that is the highest HOLD weight for any of my "per-domain" configurations.   Take Care, Dan - Origin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread Terry Parks
Does the path to the text file need to be in quotes? Terry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? Danny, This is what I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread Dan Geiser
t: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? > > > I give it a much lower rate because it will fail legitimate forwarded > email. This is the only issue I have discovered - > > -Nick Hayer > > > Giving it a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-23 Thread Danny Klopfer
block from the large domains. > -Original Message- > From: Danny Klopfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? > > The SPAMDOMAINS with an sd.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-22 Thread Paul Hung
Return Receipt Your RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? document

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-22 Thread Nick Hayer
omains. > -Original Message- > From: Danny Klopfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? > > The SPAMDOMAINS with an sd.txt file sounds interes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Gordon
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? Giving it a weight of 20 but be careful that this is not the only test it will fail as it can be dangerous to block from the large domains. -Original Message-From: Danny Klopfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 22

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-22 Thread Danny Klopfer
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? The SPAMDOMAINS with an sd.txt file sounds interesting?  Is this working well for you?  What weight are you giving it? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark GordonSent: Tuesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File?

2003-07-22 Thread Mark Gordon
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A good SD.TXT File? amazon.com aol.com     netscape.net att.net attbi.com bellatlantic.net    verizon.net bellsouth.net   bellsouth.com charter.net china.com comcast.net compuserve.com    aol.com cs.com    aol.com concentric.    .cnchost.com cox.net