Have you looked at the Commtouch ZEROHOUR add in. It has done wonders for us.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Cummins
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 8:22 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
Bilbee
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:09 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Bayesian Filtering
Have you looked at the Commtouch ZEROHOUR add in. It has done wonders for
us.
Kevin Bilbee
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:09 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Bayesian Filtering
Have you looked at the Commtouch ZEROHOUR add in. It has done wonders
for
us.
Kevin Bilbee
PROTECTED]
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Bilbee
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:09 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Bayesian Filtering
Have you looked
No plans to include Bayesian filtering, if you are still getting too much
spam I am pretty sure it is configuration related.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Cummins
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:22 AM
...any third-party products available?
Likely the easiest way to integrate a well-regarded and
widely-implemented Bayesian system is to fork standalone SpamAssassin
processes from Declude, running them against an SA ruleset that only
has Bayes rules active.
For higher
