in a
dirty word...
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 01:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on word filter!
This is the best idea I have heard so far. I
Why not just do as they ask, and let them experience the consequences? I've
found it's generally not a good idea to fight a battle against the entire
management team of a company, because even if you win the round, you will
lose the game.
I can understand their point of view. For some of my
Well, my answer was that Declude can, but the risks of accidentally deleting
good mail outweighed the convenience of not having to hit delete. She went
over my head and got the bosses on her side. Now I've gotta have a meeting
with them and come up with a solution. Any suggestions?
I'm by no
-- Original Message --
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:22:49 -0400
No matter what you do, it will probably meet not perform as they think it should. I'd
make sure they understand that e-mail WILL be
Practically all SPAM fails more than one test. This might be a time for a
review of your configuration.
I am perfectly happy with automatically deleting messages based on weight,
in doing so knowing that I have spent the time adjusting the configuration
and keeping an eye on the logs.
Example,
... assuming that you take the precautions noted in the manual for examples
like Mr. Hitchcock, you're probably safe to do this except that you should
take pains to keep them long and unlikely to appear in regular mail, e.g.
GR-X is too short (remove they hyphen).
Since a BODY search will also
]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on word filter!
Why not just do as they ask, and let them experience the
consequences? I've
found it's generally not a good idea to fight a battle
against the entire
management team of a company, because even if you win the
round, you will
lose
Dan,
First, use phrases where possible instead of single words to minimize
substring issues such as the end of e_s_s_e_x and many others like that.
Second, after you have developed your list of words or phrases, run it by
management for their analysis of any entries which could be part of
Well, my answer was that Declude can, but the risks of accidentally
deleting good mail outweighed the convenience of not having to hit
delete. She went over my head and got the bosses on her side. Now I've
gotta have a meeting with them and come up with a solution. Any
suggestions?
I have
Prior to this, we haven't deleted anything outright until
reviewed by the receptionist. Every time I hear them utter
the word delete, my skin crawls.
So my request from the list: Can you either give me some
ammo to back up my side, or provide me with a solution that
keeps her from
] On Behalf Of Russ
Uhte (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on word filter!
Well, my answer was that Declude can, but the risks of accidentally
deleting good mail outweighed the convenience
of the original message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Delete based on word filter!
Prior to this, we haven't
12 matches
Mail list logo
