RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
I also have a Hijack request. When Hijack is triggered on hold 2, often times it is some one inside sending out a broadcast. After talking to that person and explaining what happened, I need to allow that IP through again. Currently, the only why to do this is to stop (close) the console window.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
It would be nice if there was a way to reset a held IP remotely to allow it through. That is a good idea. However, if your remote access program can't access the Declude Hijack console, it's going to be hard to come up with a way to reset the IPs.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
However, if your remote access program can't access the Declude Hijack console, it's going to be hard to come up with a way to reset the IPs. I know you are waiting in anticipation for me to say it, so I will: MS Terminal services. I was thinking something along the lines of a command prompt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement

2003-02-03 Thread Charles Frolick
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Enhancement It would be nice if there was a way to reset a held IP remotely to allow it through. That is a good idea. However, if your remote access program can't access the Declude Hijack console, it's going to be hard to come up

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Thanks again Scott. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Enhancement I find that HiJack catches a meaningful amount of SPAM