Temporary restraining order against SpamCop reversed:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040512/sfw083_1.html
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:20 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop
Maybe if
Anyone have a list of IP addresses that OptInRealBig.com uses to send out
their mailings? Declude Blacklist.. :)
The web site's IP is 69.6.21.239 which is assigned to JAYS WEB SERVICE
JAYSWEBSERV-01 (NET-69-6-21-0-1) 69.6.21.0 - 69.6.21.255. There are some
interesting hostname when I did a scan
They are quite well blacklisted and the absense from SpamCop probably
won't make a difference.
Matt
Jeff Maze wrote:
Anyone have a list of IP addresses that OptInRealBig.com uses to send out
their mailings? Declude Blacklist.. :)
The web site's IP is 69.6.21.239 which is assigned to JAYS
I wouldn't dismiss this too quickly. The concern here is the
trend. Spammers using the law/can-spam act against companies that are
fighting spam. They don't have to win the suits, they just have to make it
expensive, or otherwise not worth it, like they have for many blacklists
in the past
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Hunter
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 01:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop
I wouldn't dismiss this too quickly. The concern here is the
trend. Spammers using the law/can-spam act
www.xidix.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop
Well, there is SOME truth behind their allegation - it's just
Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
702.319.4349
www.xidix.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop
Well
